Posted on 02/18/2006 3:11:39 PM PST by NormsRevenge
NORFOLK, Va. - Fellow conservative religious leaders have expressed concern and even open criticism over Pat Robertson's habit of shooting from the hip on his daily religious news-and-talk television program, "The 700 Club."
The Christian Coalition founder and former GOP presidential candidate has said American agents should assassinate Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez and suggested that Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's stroke was divine retribution for pulling Israel out of the Gaza Strip.
Some observers say Robertson, who'll turn 76 next month, courts controversy as a strategy to stay recognizable and keep his followers mobilized. Others say he remains important to the evangelical movement that he helped create when he established the Virginia Beach-based Christian Broadcasting Network in 1960 but he needs to stop damaging it with his words.
He canceled a speech planned for this coming Tuesday at the closing banquet of the National Religious Broadcasters convention in Dallas after NRB leaders said they were concerned that his appearance could detract from the event.
"He is in a very visible leadership position and comments such as recent ones related to Mr. Sharon and so many others are misinformed and presumptuous and border on arrogance," said David Dockery, president of Union University, a private college affiliated with the Tennessee Baptist Convention.
Dockery suggested Robertson might want to consult other theologians "before making these pronouncements so quickly."
"It puts the evangelical movement in a bad light when that happens because people make broad generalizations, rightly or wrongly, all the time," said Dockery, who also is chairman of the board for the Council for Christian Colleges and Universities.
Robertson, through a spokesman, declined to be interviewed by The Associated Press.
He recently said on ABC's "Good Morning America" that he ad-libs his comments after watching news segments.
He later told the Christian magazine "World" that he's being more careful and reviewing news stories before going on the air because "I have seen an intensity of attack against me that is unparalleled in the 40-some years of the broadcast."
He apologized after facing swift condemnation for his Jan. 5 statement that Sharon was punished for "dividing God's land."
Richard Land, president of the Southern Baptist Convention's ethics and religious liberty commission, has said he was "stunned and appalled that Pat Robertson would claim to know the mind of God concerning whether particular tragic events ... were the judgments of God."
Robertson cited other demands on his time when he canceled his speech to the National Religious Broadcasters convention. NRB President Frank Wright told Associated Press Radio that Robertson was not asked to cancel, but he said NRB leaders did worry that the firestorm over his Sharon comments would detract media attention from the convention's focus. Robertson is on the group's board of directors.
Robertson started out as a Southern Baptist, but today he is a charismatic evangelical and believes that God is involved in guiding world events, said Barry Hankins, professor of history and church-state studies at Baylor University. He tries to interpret contemporary events as "being part of the drama of God's activity in the world."
"He puts the most fantastic spin on things to have a gripping quality about them to keep the ground troops alert," Hankins said.
On the other hand, Brian Britt, director of the Religious Studies Program at Virginia Tech, said Robertson's remarks aren't just "off-the-wall, crazy uncle stuff" but part of a strategy that earns him headlines.
When people attack Robertson, he wins sympathy for appearing to be an underdog, Britt said.
"It reinforces an image of Christianity as a persecuted religion, a religion that is being hounded by the secularists out of the public square, rather than a dominant and hegemonic force," Britt said.
___
Eds: Associated Press Radio reporter Steve Coleman contributed to this report from Washington, D.C.
___
On the Net:
Christian Broadcasting Network: http://www.cbn.com/
Pat Robertson: http://www.patrobertson.com/
Bet people said that about Moses too.
I have long NOT been a fan of Robertson - but I'm always amazed at the venom I see because the guy speaks his mind. Since when does freedom of speech exclude you because you're a Christian and don't cowtow to "polite" speech.
*Noah was older and building an ark - surely considered insane at the time. Lot trying to get his family out--I can just hear his kids - "come on give me a break, don't even look???" - John the author of Revelation - Now WHO in their ever lovin' right mind on FreeRepublic would take that guy's visions seriously?*
But Pat Robertson - let's lock him up and not let him talk in public anymore.
Robertson is "senile," off-the-wall," an "embarrassment," a "nut."
Shall we dig into the archives of outrageously stupid comments and gestures made by the Pope, Rabbis, international "leaders," the President, various GOP/RAT Senators, Governors, and Congresscrap?
Robertson -- whose been on TV for a 25 years -- has uttered and written a million sensible words and sentences and thoughts in his life. Lately it's a simple exercise of jumping on the cheap-shot artist wagon for a couple hos couple of stumbles.
Everyone knows it's an obvious excuse to bash an icon of Protestantism/Christendom to the disproportionate extreme.
You people are disingenuously petty and BOR-ING.
And a bunch of these idiots howl at the moon from the attic of Free Republic.
You are absolutely right, it would be sin if Mr. Dockery is a Christian. Maybe he isn't.
Yeah. His only problem has been saying out loud what he is thinking.
LIBERIAN GOLD.
When you run your mouth to the entire world as Robertson did presuming to speak for American Christianity, taking your response off line isn't an option. Robertson spoke publicly. He had to be shut down publicly. Things that happen in the public arena cannot be responded to privately.
From the headline I thought he had broken a public toilet or something.
And it wasn't about being "in sin". In sin is if Dockery thought Robertson was having an affair. In sin is if Dockery thought Robertson was drinking too much. In sin is if Dockery thought Robertson was embezzling.
Making stupid public statements that presume to speak for all Christians isn't being "in sin".
well said
Bull. Public actions cannot be responded to privately. You are foolishly confusing public with private actions.
If a Christian is sinning furtively you don't confront him publicly. You confront him privately. If you think someone is furtively sinning and will not change then you hold an 'intervention'.
What about public sin ? When Ananias and Sapphira publicly lied about the money they contributed did Peter privately take them aside and speak with them ? No. He denounced them immediately in front of the entire church. When Peter stopped eating with Gentiles, Paul rebuked him before the entire church.
We all live in a media fishbowl and Pat Robertson made fundamentalist Christians look like fools. That could not be let stand.
The sin of Pride, perhaps?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.