Skip to comments.
THE BARRETT REPORT (Center for Individual Freedom)
GOPUSA via CFIF ^
| February 18, 2006
| GOPUSA via CFIF E-mail
Posted on 02/18/2006 12:22:10 PM PST by CyberAnt
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
To: DJ MacWoW
But .. when they hear from the people who actually vote for them in their district .. they can get a lot of courage in a hurry. It's the bubble of DC that keeps them quiet.
41
posted on
02/18/2006 1:51:29 PM PST
by
CyberAnt
(Democrat Leadership = No program - no ideas - no clue.)
To: Natural Law
Well .. your assumptions are all incorrect.
The truth is .. in order to run for President .. you have to have it burning in your belly. GHW Bush did not have that for a second term - GW did.
That's the truth.
It was Clinton who had the Mena/CIA/drug connection - not the Bush family.
42
posted on
02/18/2006 1:54:14 PM PST
by
CyberAnt
(Democrat Leadership = No program - no ideas - no clue.)
To: Txsleuth
Yes, I've heard that too .. but the source of that info is a left-leaner and if they believe George Allen might be a strong candidate .. then the lie about his distancing himself from Bush would be typical of their misinformation.
I believe it also may be a plan to keep George Allen from getting re-elected to the Senate. I do want George re-elected [even though I can't vote for him] - because I believe he will be able to take to the floor of the Senate and convey some important information to conservatives about his ideas and his convictions.
43
posted on
02/18/2006 1:57:35 PM PST
by
CyberAnt
(Democrat Leadership = No program - no ideas - no clue.)
To: Baynative
Hmmmm?? Interesting observation.
I wonder if McCain is involved in some shady stuff that's in the Barrett Report, and he doesn't want it to come out. And .. it might explain why he's so cozy with so many dems. Hmmmmm??
44
posted on
02/18/2006 2:00:58 PM PST
by
CyberAnt
(Democrat Leadership = No program - no ideas - no clue.)
Comment #45 Removed by Moderator
To: Baynative
I forgot to say thanks for getting involved and making those contacts.
If everyone who votes would do that - we could see some major changes.
46
posted on
02/18/2006 2:24:53 PM PST
by
CyberAnt
(Democrat Leadership = No program - no ideas - no clue.)
To: CyberAnt
I guess the subtle sarcasm was just a bit over your head.
To: CyberAnt
I'll call Dennis Kucinich's office. That'll do a lot of good!
To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra
Yes, it will .. I saw Dennis on the Able Danger hearings with Chris Shays. He was clearly on the side of Sheaffer - so he might be very receptive of the Barrett Report being released.
Don't assume - just do the asking. We must be cowed by thinking our calls are no good - THEY ARE GOOD - AND OUR VOICES NEED TO BE HEARD.
So they don't always respond the way we like - more often - THEY DO.
49
posted on
02/18/2006 2:40:42 PM PST
by
CyberAnt
(Democrat Leadership = No program - no ideas - no clue.)
To: Natural Law
Insults don't work on me.
And .. if you were using sarcasm .. it's only polite to use the [/s] tag at the end - because not everybody holds daily conversations with you and knows how you think.
You're overestimating your importance!
50
posted on
02/18/2006 2:42:26 PM PST
by
CyberAnt
(Democrat Leadership = No program - no ideas - no clue.)
To: Baynative
Well .. that wouldn't surprise me.
I only know that when he began his run against W in 2000, his wife was sporting a "Hillary pin". That did it for me.
51
posted on
02/18/2006 2:43:44 PM PST
by
CyberAnt
(Democrat Leadership = No program - no ideas - no clue.)
To: Baynative
Did Grassley sign his 180 yet?
52
posted on
02/18/2006 4:04:03 PM PST
by
EQAndyBuzz
("We don't need POLITICIANS...we need STATESMEN.")
To: Natural Law
I truly hope you don't receive many replies criticizing you for a thought I have had in the same direction as you.
I don't know all the ins and outs but it is mighty suspicious to see Bush 41 being so friendly with "Bill" and not defending his son who has been attacked time and again by both Clintons.
It seems to me it is not just the Democrats but also some HIGH Republicans that may not want this report out.
53
posted on
02/18/2006 4:23:41 PM PST
by
frannie
(Be not afraid of tomorrow - God is already there!)
To: boomop1
These chicken shi* morons are all talk no action, got a e-mail from Eberle asking me to fax these jerks. Why should I have to pay for fax for them to do their job, they aren't going to to it any way.Again & again & again this corrupt"Two-Party Cartel" which is owned by the elites, will never let the lib establishment to decline so as a true conservative agenda can flourish. So keep voting these same creatures in via these two factions & I guarantee you the same results.
54
posted on
02/18/2006 4:26:34 PM PST
by
Digger
To: Natural Law
I've always suspected that Bush 41 punted on his reelection bid because the Clinton's had some dirt on his involvement in the Mena / CIA / drug connection. I suspect there is some quid pro quo with Bush 43 in keeping both stories quiet. But hey, my tin foil hat might need the batteries replaced too.I would say you are 98% correct. I firmly believe that most all are - exception Reagan & Buchanan. They ( the elites) did not own them & that is why they are/were continually smeared.
55
posted on
02/18/2006 4:33:46 PM PST
by
Digger
To: frannie
There is only reason to vote Republican - Democrats.
To: Txsleuth; CyberAnt; All
The truth is sooner or later someone in the Senate or the house has to grow a pair and do the right thing. We can't expect Curt Weldon to carry the ball for everyone, everywhere, all the time.
57
posted on
02/18/2006 4:43:04 PM PST
by
rodguy911
(Support the New Media and F.R.)
To: rodguy911
Tony Snow said that Pence was 'committed' to getting the report released so I'm waiting for that. /s
58
posted on
02/18/2006 4:52:26 PM PST
by
Mr Cobol
(We know how many seeds are in an apple, but only God knows how many apples are in a seed.)
To: CyberAnt
59
posted on
02/18/2006 4:59:30 PM PST
by
Mad_Tom_Rackham
(A Liberal: One who demands half of your pie, because he didn't bake one.)
To: CyberAnt
C'mon, vital secrets concerning our wartime intelligence gathering are leaked to the NY Times and this report can't be leaked somehow?
Isn't there anyone with the testicular fortitude to do it. You can't tell me that there aren't 100 people in DC that know exactly what's in this report and probably have copies of it.
Hillary must have more than 1,500 files!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson