"The answer is that they didn't have a damn thing to say about those two acquisitions, which tells me that they really don't give a flying sh!t about "national security" issues."
And I don't give a flying shiite about Schumer or King. They are irrelevant opportunists, who were provided this idiotic opportunity due to a strange miscalculation, given the mood of the country after having been attacked by radical Islam. Can you vouch for this UAE entity, insofar as their not having personnel sharing these radical Islamist beliefs, that have been proven quite a few times over the past five years to be very dangerous to our country? You can't.
If you don't care about king and schumer then why are you parroting their talking points.
1. From a national security standpoint, what exactly do you think could happen in this country with this UAE-owned company operating terminals at a number of ports?
2. What exactly can be accomplished by a terrorist with this UAE-owned company operating a port terminal that cannot be accomplished already today with a Dutch, Danish, British, or American company operating the terminal?
"Can you vouch for this UAE entity, insofar as their not having personnel sharing these radical Islamist beliefs, that have been proven quite a few times over the past five years to be very dangerous to our country? You can't.
"
Can you vouch for ANY port administration company currently operating ports in the US? Can you assure us that they do not have personnel sharing these radical islamist beiefs? Are you 100% sure not a single islamist sympathizer works at a port in any capacity?
For someone who doesn't give a "shiite" about King and Schumer, you're babbling their talking points word for word.