SAVAGE INTERVIEWING CHUCK SCHUMER!

[outofhere2]

Michael Savage is talking to Chuck Schumer at this very minute.

[antceecee]

Yes, I read that thread several days ago, but the issue is being flamed by Shumer and Clinton as I said to score political points.

[Czar]

"Sorry, sounds like savage bent over for schlumer."

Really? I've never known Savage to roll over for anybody. Perhaps a transcript will be available.

[operation clinton cleanup]

I am waiting for all the facts to come in, but my instincts tell me I will always be right by taking the opposing position of Chuck Schumer.

[blogblogginaway]

I have no control over what FOX or anyone else publishes about this issue. I do know that the phrase " is poised to take over significant operations at six American ports" simply means the company they are buying does a significant amount of business at the ports.

YES Americans should feel apprehensive about how this is being portrayed because it is NOT BEING PORTRAYED ACCURATELY!

My first take on this deal was ....WTH???? But my common sense told me there was no way in hell Bush would let a foreign company 'take over' security at our ports! So I had to spend some time getting to the truth of the matter which is simply, the UAE is buying an existing company that has done business at our ports for some time and NOTHING will change from the way this company has been doing port business.

[California Patriot]

Let's make this a household name among conservatives:

"Schmuck" Schumer. Not original to me, but I love it.
Say it loud, say it proud ...

[LibLieSlayer]

There are a lot of us that are thinking exactly as you do on this matter. Logic seems unwelcome here lately, and your posts in this thread are full of that commodity.

Thanks for being a light of reason in a sea of turmoil.

LLS

[oceanview]

how do you know "nothing will change"?

[DJ MacWoW]

Yes, I read that thread several days ago, but the issue is being flamed by Shumer and Clinton as I said to score political points.

King has been all over this the last few days but Schmucky and Hitlary just made it louder. King doesn't have the name recognition that they do.

Too bad the press has been so focused on Cheney that this nearly slid under the radar.

[P-40]

This port issue is a tempest in a teapot stirred up by Shmucky Shumer and Hitlery in an effort to make themselves look good on Homeland Security issues.


It'll keep Able Danger off the front page also.

[outofhere2]

Foley and Santorum are sound men. The fact that they went on Savage illustrates Savage pull among American conservatives. If you are a jump off the cliff Republican, than Savage is for those people. Savage doesn't follow the party line.

[antceecee]

Ditto that... thanks for your calm reasoning AC.

[skeeter]

But my common sense told me there was no way in hell Bush would let a foreign company 'take over' security at our ports! So I had to spend some time getting to the truth of the matter which is simply, the UAE is buying an existing company that has done business at our ports for some time and NOTHING will change from the way this company has been doing port business.

By all means, give me the link to the info which provided this gaurantee.

[DJ MacWoW]

But my common sense told me there was no way in hell Bush would let a foreign company 'take over' security at our ports!

After his stance on security at the Mexican border, I'm not so sure. This is going to RUIN my record as a "Bushbot!" ;)

[outofhere2]

Thank you Czar, Savage doesn't rollover for anyone. What you have here are people threatened that Bush may lose support over this but he put himself in this position, not Savage or Schumer or Clinton or Binky Rabbit.

[FreeReign]

If there is a terrorist out there looking to do harm to the U.S. by shipping some dangerous cargo through these ports, there isn't a damn thing he could do with a UAE-owned company running that terminal that he couldn't do already.

Exactly right.

[antceecee]

Yes, I see that also. They can't let Able Danger enter the news cycle. They used the Cheney thing to cover the first part of the week (actually that gave cover for Al Gore also). Now this... they are despicable.

[Pukin Dog]

The fact that they went on Savage illustrates Savage pull among American conservatives.

If true, that should scare you to death.

[P-40]

Perhaps a transcript will be available.


He will replay the interview in a bit.

[blogblogginaway]

"You are splitting hairs. The UAE will have control of our ports"

Are you out of you skull??? They will be leasing port terminal space, just like the previous owners of this company. Did the previous owners "have control of our ports"??? You people are simply amazing.

[ex-Texan]

I love Michael Savage. He gets a bit agitated, but that's just fine with me. Savage demands the U.S. close our borders! He sees the obvious security risks involved with leaving the back door open while 'fighting a war on terror. I will get on a chair and shout: "Lock down our borders now! Arrest and deport all illegal immigrants! Pass a Constitutional amendment so that merely being born in the U.S. is not ground for automatic citizenship. Stop hiring illegals! Pass a law enabling the federal government to instantly check all Social Security numbers for fakes, multiple use and forgeries! Stop using the borders for smuggling drugs and illegals and terrorists!"

That is just for starters!