Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: atlaw
And considering that the buy-out (which would actually be an anticipatory breach) . . .

I think the "probably" still stands, because the notion of an "anticipatory breach" in a merger/acquisition of this sort may not necessarily apply. If I am the Port Authority of NY and NJ and I have a lease arrangement with P&O Ports, I may have a very strong case if I decide to terminate the lease in the event the ownership of P&O changes. I didn't sign the deal with DPW -- I signed it with P&O.

113 posted on 02/17/2006 2:09:58 PM PST by Alberta's Child (Leave a message with the rain . . . you can find me where the wind blows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

Maybe. It would very intersting to see the actual contrats between P&O and the various port authorities. And it would be highly ironic if the local level reversed the federal rubber stamp. Local authorities do, after all, have a slightly more acute and personal interest.


114 posted on 02/17/2006 2:23:04 PM PST by atlaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson