Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Paul Hackett's Wild Charges
NewsMax ^ | Feb. 16, 2006 | Carl Limbacher

Posted on 02/16/2006 9:12:48 PM PST by Kaslin

Up and coming Democratic Party star Paul Hackett withdrew from the Ohio Senate race last week, saying "my own party is afraid to support candidates like me."

The Iraq war veteran meant that party officials feared backing a principled liberal like himself.

But Dems may have had another reason for pulling the plug on Hackett: his tendency to level outrageous charges without a shred of evidence to back them up.

WMAL Washington, D.C. radio host Steve Malzberg aired quotes from Hackett on Wednesday, where he repeatedly accused President Bush of using drugs.

Last November, Hackett began by telling Gentleman's Quarterly that Bush joined the National Guard instead of the army because "he wanted to drink alcohol and snort cocaine and party.”

A few days after the story hit newsstands, the Ohio Democrat was challenged about the allegation during an appearance on MSNBC's "Hardball" with Chris Matthews.

MATTHEWS: You said he wanted to drink alcohol and snort cocaine and party. Do you stand by that?

HACKETT: Those are the facts and I stand by them.

MATTHEWS: How do you know it's a fact that the president snorted cocaine, as you say.

HACKETT: I think it's been widely reported leading up to his first election. And there are many who have come forward and documented it and said they saw it happen. I take that at face value. I think that's probably quite factual.

Given the fact that he worked so hard to avoid service during his generation, it seems consistent to me . . . .

MATTHEWS: You know for a fact that President Bush, the commander-in-chief - because you're running for the U.S. Senate - was a cocaine user? You know that for a fact?

HACKETT: Well, I've read the reports as you have read the reports.

MATTHEWS: They're not reports, they're charges. I wouldn't say that I've read it in the Associated Press or the Wall Street Journal or the New York Times. I may have heard the arguments made by people who I may not think have a firm grounding in journalism. But I've never heard a major or quality newspaper make such a charge.

HACKETT: I think that's a fair criticism. I'm merely relaying what you've heard and what I've heard.

MATTHEWS: That doesn't make it a fact, having heard it, does it?

HACKETT: Point well taken. I think, though, that where there's smoke, there's fire. [END EXCERPT]


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: demprimary; hackett

1 posted on 02/16/2006 9:12:49 PM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

This guy Hackett is the pedophile, isn't he? Or no.... maybe I'm thinking of Scott Ritter.
Whatever.


2 posted on 02/16/2006 9:16:36 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Hackett is actually not a Democrat.

He comes from that same school of politic that produced John McCain and Wesley Clark. They don't have core beliefs or principles, and live only for the sound of their own voice. Had Republicans backed Hackett, he would have spouted the party line like a pro. Many would have loved him and defended him, but in the end, he would have turned out just like another of that breed, one Duke Cunningham.
3 posted on 02/16/2006 9:19:15 PM PST by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
Interestingly enough, the DUmmies had their panties in a bunch over Hackett dropping. He had them convinced that he was a true believer.

Doesn't say much about the discernment abilities of the DUmmies, does it?

4 posted on 02/16/2006 9:23:47 PM PST by Gordongekko909 (I know. Let's cut his WHOLE BODY off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

DUmmies are pissed that Hackett is being pushed out.

The Dims are attemping to move to the middle again.

They trimmed Sheehan


5 posted on 02/16/2006 9:24:59 PM PST by mylife (The roar of the masses could be farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
But Dems may have had another reason for pulling the plug on Hackett: his tendency to level outrageous charges without a shred of evidence to back them up.

I would think that would make Hackett a RAT star.

6 posted on 02/16/2006 9:29:16 PM PST by Mike Darancette (Condimaniac)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
Hackett is actually not a Democrat.

More like a Hacketteer, you say? Akin to the McCainiac and the Weasel.

Now that you mention it, they are of a type...

7 posted on 02/16/2006 9:30:12 PM PST by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

A star with the uberleft but I belive the Hillarys and Teds, while just as radical regard hackett and sheehan as loose cannons


8 posted on 02/16/2006 9:32:05 PM PST by mylife (The roar of the masses could be farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I am a confidant of a man who is intimately a Bush confidant, and though I've met with Bush and talked with him on a number of occasions, it doesn't make me the ideal character witness.

I am aware of more of his previous character flaws than have ever been reported, not that they were terribly serious. Most of us made mistakes that other people witnessed or were a party to. I'm not sure character flaws is a good description. "Things that he's not proud of" might be better.

Cocaine is not one of those for President Bush. It's a vicious lie.


9 posted on 02/16/2006 9:32:34 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I wish he would get back in teh race. We need Dimmycraps like this guy.


10 posted on 02/16/2006 9:42:24 PM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

"Given the fact that he worked so hard to avoid service during his generation, it seems consistent to me . . . ."


I never dreamed that 6 years service in the National Guard would be called avoiding military service. This must really irritate the National Guard and Reserve, Airborne Rangers, Navy Seals, Green Berets and oh ya fighter pilots.


11 posted on 02/16/2006 9:52:20 PM PST by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

This guy spewing this stuff and they say he's a lawyer?


12 posted on 02/16/2006 10:29:11 PM PST by ONETWOONE (onetwoone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
This guy Hackett is the pedophile, isn't he? Or no...

According to Hackett, as long as you heard someone make the allegation, it must be a fact...
13 posted on 02/16/2006 10:40:25 PM PST by Welsh Rabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TBP

What we really need are true conservatives to stand up to them.


14 posted on 02/16/2006 10:53:45 PM PST by Just Lori (Trying to reason with a liberal is like sucking spaghetti through a straw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Welsh Rabbit

So, based upon the fact that you just "heard" that, and I've just now "heard" what you "heard", my only question is why isn't Hackett registered in some child molester registry somewhere? The man is a dangerous pedophile!

Hoist. Petard. His Own.


15 posted on 02/16/2006 10:56:40 PM PST by mkjessup (The Shah doesn't look so bad now, eh? But nooo, Jimmah said the Ayatollah was a 'godly' man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Spanaway Lori

True, but given the eternal wimpiness of the GOP, a few Paul Hacketts make life easier. They can be beaten so easily it isn't funny, and where they do win, they just make their party look bad.


16 posted on 02/17/2006 1:38:48 PM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson