Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Alan Colmes Repeated False Suggestion That Iraq's WMD Were Destroyed By Clinton
Newsbusters.org ^ | 16 December 2006 | Dave Pierre

Posted on 02/16/2006 8:58:59 PM PST by infoguy

On tonight's episode of Hannity & Colmes (Thursday February 16, 2006), co-host Alan Colmes repeated the false suggestion that Iraq's WMD "were destroyed in 1998 when Bill Clinton did pinpoint bombing." This is the second time that Newsbusters has addressed this claim by Colmes.

One of tonight's guests was Bill Tierney, a former military intelligence officer and an UNSCOM inspector in Iraq from 1996-1998. As you'll see below, Tierney claims intimate knowledge of the 1998 Desert Fox strikes (to which Colmes refers).

From tonight's Hannity & Colmes (emphasis mine) (audiotape on file):

COLMES: The WMDs did not exist as far as we know when we went to war with Iraq, and David Kay said they were destroyed in 1998 when Bill Clinton did pinpoint bombing.

TIERNEY: I'm so happy you said that. I was on the targeting shop at CENTCOM. Alright? I'm gonna tell you something: Before we went in there, the Iraqis moved all their equipment out, except for a few massive machines that they couldn't move. That four days of bombing was a joke. They rebuilt everything.

COLMES: So David Kay?

TIERNEY: Well, David Kay doesn't know -- Actually, I know more about this than David Kay does.

(By the way, Tierney is also the translator of the 12 hours of audiotape of Saddam Hussein that ABC News has recently acquired. ABC News reports that they received the tapes from Tierney.)

In addition, check out what Tierney said in an eye-opening November 2005 interview for FrontPageMag:

"Operation Desert Fox was a perfect example of the uselessness of strike operations. Iraqis have told me that the WMD destruction and movement started just after Operation Desert Fox, since after all, who would be so stupid as to start a bombing campaign and just stop.
"... It was only after Saddam realized that President Clinton lacked the nerve for anything more than a temper-tantrum demonstration that he knew the doors were wide open for him to continue his weapons program. We didn’t break his will, we didn’t destroy his weapons making capability (The Iraqis simply moved most of the precision machinery out prior to the strikes, then rebuilt the buildings), but we did kill some Iraqi bystanders, just so President Clinton could say 'something must be done, so I did something'."

Finally, there was no such claim by David Kay in his reports about Bill Clinton eliminating Iraq's WMD [link to Kay text]. Although Kay has stated that he believes that the 1998 Desert Fox strikes may have played a contributing role in dismantling Saddam's chemical weapons ("Information found to date suggests that Iraq's large-scale capability to develop, produce, and fill new CW munitions was reduced -- if not entirely destroyed -- during Operations Desert Storm and Desert Fox, 13 years of UN sanctions and UN inspections." [link to Kay text]), biological and nuclear weapons are an entirely different matter. In Kay's 2003 text, he mentions no such elimination of biological or nuclear weapons as the result of Desert Fox. (In fact, "We have discovered dozens of WMD-related program activities and significant amounts of equipment that Iraq concealed from the United Nations during the inspections that began in late 2002.")

Bottom line: Colmes' claim is baseless.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: alancolmes; billtierney; foxnews; iraq; saddamtapestierney; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

1 posted on 02/16/2006 8:59:02 PM PST by infoguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: infoguy

So, Clinton's bombings were successful?

Mercy me.....let me get to DU right now!!


2 posted on 02/16/2006 9:01:07 PM PST by Loud Mime (Republicans protect Americans from terrorists, Democrats protect terrorists from Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: infoguy

Colmes is civil as liberals go but he can be a real fool. In case anyone does not know he has a chapter in his book proclaiming the innocense of OJ Simpson.


3 posted on 02/16/2006 9:07:22 PM PST by Honestfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: infoguy

Alan Colmes makes me about as angry as any liberal punster out there. The Mr. knows what I'm watching when I'm yelling at the TV. He also actually said that it's ok for black commentators to disparage whites, but not the other way around....that's racist. "The pendulum swings both ways, you DUNCE!" See? Now I'm yelling at the computer!


4 posted on 02/16/2006 9:17:11 PM PST by Just Lori (Trying to reason with a liberal is like sucking spaghetti through a straw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Honestfreedom

I am with you on that. He is one of the FEW liberals I can stand. I have no problem with him with the exception I don't agree with a single thing he says, but I think that at least he is not a moonbat. I think the show Hannity and Combs is definitely one of the most equal shows on tv. This thing with WMD is crazy for Combs to state and maybe he is having an off day.


5 posted on 02/16/2006 9:18:05 PM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Honestfreedom

One need only look at Colmes and listen to him for 10 minutes, to conclude he's seriously imparied...

He is hopelessly lunatic left....

Semper Fi


6 posted on 02/16/2006 9:24:49 PM PST by river rat (You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: infoguy

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/3872201.stm


Alan Colmes is another talking-points spouting fool.


7 posted on 02/16/2006 9:27:57 PM PST by Triggerhippie (Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loud Mime
If Clinton destroyed the WMDs in 1998, then why would it be necessary to send in inspectors afterward to inspect for weapons that no longer existed?

If Clinton said they were destroyed, it would have made him out to be a hero and likely would have prevented the need to take military action against Saddam Hussein in 2003. So, why did Clinton say nothing about it before the raid on Iraq occurred?

Clearly, Colmes doesn't know what he's talking about.

8 posted on 02/16/2006 9:30:07 PM PST by Dave Olson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: infoguy
That exchange was a hoot. Colmes loves to use the pin point bombing line and someone finally told him it was a joke instead of a success.
9 posted on 02/16/2006 9:31:03 PM PST by armymarinemom (My sons freed Iraqi and Afghanistan Honor Roll students.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dave Olson

I've seen more depth in potholes.


10 posted on 02/16/2006 9:31:55 PM PST by gov_bean_ counter (It is easy to call for a pi$$ing contest when you aren't going to be in the line of fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dave Olson
"Clearly, Colmes doesn't know what he's talking about."

That's a rather common condition for Colmes.
11 posted on 02/16/2006 9:34:17 PM PST by knew it all the time
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: infoguy

I hope we shall be hearing a lot more from Bill Tierney in the months ahead. He sure is one explosive matter of fact guy. I always thought Kay was on the fence and this guy's statements more or less confirm what I had thought. At any rate, with the huge amounts of stuff slowly becoming public such as those ABC devulged tapes of Saddam and his goons making it clear once and for all they worked hard at deceiving the weapons inpectors, there should be less crap being said about wmds and reasons to go into Iraq. Only morons or really ill informed people can hold to the fact Saddam did not have every desire to rebuild his bio/chemical/nuclear programs full hilt once the economic sanctions where lifted. They just had to much stuff sold to them by Europeans and the Russians as well as building their own manufacturing facilities etc..


12 posted on 02/16/2006 9:44:49 PM PST by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: infoguy
Alan Colmes is nothing more than a Bill Clinton sock puppet and democrat operative. Sometimes I marvel at how many DNC talking points the guy can cram into a 1 hr show.
13 posted on 02/16/2006 9:59:24 PM PST by Bullish (Proudly and consistently hating the Clinton's since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: infoguy

A liberal perpetuating a falsehood?

Thats unpossible!


14 posted on 02/16/2006 10:01:48 PM PST by Dr.Zoidberg (Mohammedism - Bringing you only the best of the 6th century for fourteen hundred years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bullish


LOL --- I concur.


15 posted on 02/16/2006 10:03:33 PM PST by onyx (IF ONLY 10% of Muslims are radical, that's still 120 MILLION who want to kill us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: infoguy

Colmes has to be a plant. Nobody can be that stupid.


16 posted on 02/16/2006 10:20:26 PM PST by philetus (Keep doing what you always do and you'll keep getting what you always get.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: infoguy

"Colmes claim is baseless"


That's because Colmes is brainless!


17 posted on 02/16/2006 11:00:25 PM PST by CyberAnt (Democrat Leadership = No program - no ideas - no clue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: philetus
>"Colmes has to be a plant. Nobody can be that stupid.>"

Yer right! He's got allah the mental capacity of a potted artificial marijuana plant!

Smoke that one Willie, but don't inhale for one hit. (That way you can claim to have smoked once and not inhaled)

Pathetic Dumborats!--haaack spit!

Kill A Commie For Mommie
Seven Dead Monkeys Page O Tunes

18 posted on 02/16/2006 11:11:23 PM PST by rawcatslyentist ("Why waste time learning, when ignorance is instantaneous"---Hobbes the Tiger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; Timesink; VPMWife78; ajolympian2004; Gracey; Alamo-Girl; RottiBiz; FoxGirl; ...
FoxFan ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my FoxFan list. *Warning: This can be a high-volume ping list at times.

19 posted on 02/16/2006 11:20:49 PM PST by nutmeg (NEVER trust democRATs with our national security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; Doctor Raoul; ELS; ...
ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.

20 posted on 02/16/2006 11:21:42 PM PST by nutmeg (NEVER trust democRATs with our national security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson