Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mo. firefighters refuse to help non-member
modbee ^ | 2-16-06

Posted on 02/16/2006 3:52:53 PM PST by LouAvul

Edited on 02/16/2006 6:43:01 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

MONETT, Mo. (AP) - Rural firefighters stood by and watched a fire destroy a garage and a vehicle because the property owner had not paid membership dues.

Bibaldo Rueda - who was injured battling the flames Monday - offered to pay the dues as the fire blazed away, but the Monett Rural Fire Department does not have a policy for on-the-spot billing, Sheriff's Detective Robert Evenson said.


(Excerpt) Read more at modbee.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: Missouri
KEYWORDS: firefighters; missouri
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 421-431 next last
To: Trailerpark Badass

"I'm bettin Rueda is a liar."

That's what my money is on too. There is way too much PR and too many events and too much talk involving the VFD in all rural communities for him to have missed it.

Our little town quadruples in population the Saturdays of the VFD fund raisers.

And when we pay for the brownie at the dessert table, it's a twenty dollar bill that goes into the till, with change refused.


221 posted on 02/16/2006 7:06:17 PM PST by TexanToTheCore (Rock the pews, Baby)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek
You know, they could have put the fire out when the guy offered to pay and then billed him for it. Officious little pricks.

Speaking of "officious little pricks...

Many years ago, in Southern California, a friend lost their barn full of hay, and part of their field, because the district line was the middle of the street. The house was on one side; the barn on the other. 911 sent the department the house phone ID showed as the address.

When the firemen arrived, they refused to not only fight it, but also refused to call radio the other department.

They "generously" offered to 'stand by' in case the fire jumped the road into their territory, and made our friend go back, almost a 1/4 mile of driveway, to the house and call it in again, and "this time, ask the operator for the other department by name."

222 posted on 02/16/2006 7:06:27 PM PST by ApplegateRanch (Mad-Mo! Allah bin Satan commands ye: Bow to him 5 times/day: Head down, @ss-up, and fart at Heaven!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw
Simple solution to this problem. Establish a policy where on-the-spot membership dues will be four times normal with a lien on the property. "Sign right here.".

At 100x the annual rate, it would be a bargain (compared with not having any fire service). Set the multiple too much lower and nobody will pay it until they have a fire.

Fighting the fire first and then worrying about billing might be nice, but it poses problems. Not only is there the risk that the bill won't get paid, but there are also liability risks especially since effective fire fighting often requires deliberate property damage (of course, the damage from chopping a hole in a roof will typically be much less than the damage from having fire gasses flash over, but that doesn't mean someone wouldn't sue for the hole in his roof).

In many ways, I would suggest that payment for fire protection services should be processed through the insurance company; this would not only ensure that the necessary bills were paid, but if there were any payment/service options (e.g. for one price, they'll try to prevent fires from spreading structure to structure, but won't do much to save a building that's already burning; for a higher price they'd take a more active role trying to salvage burning buildings). If such options existed, the insurance company would have an interest in balancing the cost of a higher level of service with the probability of reduced claims.

223 posted on 02/16/2006 7:10:59 PM PST by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

There has got to be more to the story. I seriously doubt that the fire dept. takes the time to go through the billing records before responding to each fire. Unless of course the community was small enough that it was a well known fact that this guy wasn't paying, in which case i would think somebody would have told him about the program.


224 posted on 02/16/2006 7:13:18 PM PST by KurtZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: supercat

I would bet this individual had zero insurance from what I've gleaned from the article.

He would still be SOL.


225 posted on 02/16/2006 7:15:06 PM PST by listenhillary ("Mainstream media" is creating it's own reality~everything sucks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: workerbee
This is shameful. The man said he didn't even know about the program; you can believe many of the residents didn't either, til now.

Thats funny I heard a report this morning that he paid the first year, then failed to renew after. I remember stories like this several time growing up in MO.

226 posted on 02/16/2006 7:15:10 PM PST by MilspecRob (Most people don't act stupid, they really are.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ozarkgirl
You are adamantly in suport of the system you are familliar with. That, as is the choice of how you folks decide to do things, is your right.

Consider this, please. I have lived in, and been a volunteer fireman in areas where volunteer departments were supported by fire tax levies. The equipment is the best, the training is superb, and the firefighters and EMS are on par with paid departments anywhere. Everyone benefits from this system, and everyone pays for it.

I do have a question, though. How do vehicle accidents get handled under this private pay system? Is there something I should be aware of if I am driving down there?

I, for one, would have hung up my turnout gear for good if ordered to stand there and watch someone's house burn.

There is no way I would have been able to look anyone straight in the eye and say I was a firefighter.

227 posted on 02/16/2006 7:15:40 PM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981

No plans to do so anytime soon. At least I can RTFA a talent you seem to be lacking.


228 posted on 02/16/2006 7:19:34 PM PST by listenhillary ("Mainstream media" is creating it's own reality~everything sucks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: SmoothTalker
In general I am a very big proponent of small government. However I think offering fire, police, and emergency services is a very legitimate role for the government. Somethings can be contracted out. Somethings shouldn't be. Those services shouldn't be.

At minimum, when dwellings are close enough together that fire might spread from one to another, it would seem that there should be a municipal fire department to, at minimum, prevent such spread.

As for protection beyond that, there might be benefits to a contract-based service (including allowing people to balance privacy with fire-fighting effectiveness).

229 posted on 02/16/2006 7:21:23 PM PST by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981
I would be tempted to vote for very large damages here.

Sure. Bankrupt the local volunteer fire department and then no one would have protection. Sounds like a good socialist solution to me. Go after the firefighters and take their homes as well. That'll shut down all the other volunteer departments in the state.

Rural folks don't deserve the right to band together to help each other anyway. Let all their homes and barns burn down and make them move to the city where they can be more easily controlled.

230 posted on 02/16/2006 7:25:26 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe
I do have a question, though. How do vehicle accidents get handled under this private pay system? Is there something I should be aware of if I am driving down there?

We have EMS, I'm sure that's tax funded. We don't have the lime green fire trucks that also handle emergencies and traffic accidents. Our firefighters are just volunteer fire fighters, nothing more. One tanker truck that carries water and 3 others that hook up to fire hydrants (all old fashioned red ones).

I mentioned in a previous post that I've not seen or heard of our firefighters refusing to help but that I would never, ever blame them if they did. I know not everyone pays but again, never heard of them not responding. Monett is about 30 miles away.

And it's not private pay, it's volunteer.

231 posted on 02/16/2006 7:27:09 PM PST by ozarkgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul
…while firefighters stood by on the road, watching in case the blaze spread to neighboring properties owned by members.

The same should happen to them and their families. Toast 'em all.

232 posted on 02/16/2006 7:34:05 PM PST by solitas (So what if I support an OS that has fewer flaws than yours? 'Mystic' dual 500 G4's, OSX.4.2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48

Yes, it's real. What I don't understand, is these guys are volunteer firemen. They don't get paid anyway. Why should they care?


233 posted on 02/16/2006 7:36:09 PM PST by auggy ( http://www.wtv-zone.com/Mary/THISWILLMAKEYOUPROUD.HTML)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LouAvul
Rural firefighters stood by and watched a fire destroy a garage and a vehicle because the property owner had not paid membership dues.

That was not the Christian thing to do.

234 posted on 02/16/2006 7:36:22 PM PST by oldbrowser (We must act today in order to preserve tomorrow......R.R)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ApplegateRanch
They "generously" offered to 'stand by' in case the fire jumped the road into their territory, and made our friend go back, almost a 1/4 mile of driveway, to the house and call it in again, and "this time, ask the operator for the other department by name."

Did he walk back again with his shotgun?

235 posted on 02/16/2006 7:36:40 PM PST by solitas (So what if I support an OS that has fewer flaws than yours? 'Mystic' dual 500 G4's, OSX.4.2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: NCLaw441
The thinking of those who would save this guy's property is exemplary of liberals who are willing to let guilty criminals go free because of a bad upbringing, or give money to single mothers with 5 or 6 kids "because they need it" when to do so does nothing but encourage more of the same irresponsible behavior. People are watching. People learn, quickly, how to game the system.

I don't know how or where you got 'liberals letting guilty criminals go free' from former or current firefighters expressing contempt for anyone who calls themselves a firefighter and just stands there and lets the place burn.

Quit changing the subject.

236 posted on 02/16/2006 7:37:04 PM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: solitas

Now we have armchair firemen on FR. Cool


237 posted on 02/16/2006 7:38:06 PM PST by listenhillary ("Mainstream media" is creating it's own reality~everything sucks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: Species8472
We could never morally refuse to respond outside our district, given equipment and manpower availability.

The law may give you more protection up there, but I recall a case out of Tennessee where a department responded outside thier area, and was rewarded with a lawsuit from the owner of the building who felt that there was too much fire damage.

238 posted on 02/16/2006 7:42:44 PM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe
You are adamantly in support of the system you are familiar with.

No, the voters are adamantly opposed to a property tax based system for fire protection. THEY VOTED IT DOWN in 2001.

You are free to knock yourself out helping this guy fight the fire. I doubt the other members would physically restrain you from assisting. They may stop you from taking the VOLUNTEER fire equipment in to assist.

I'm in no way dissing this guy because he is Hispanic. It sounds like many other Hispanics that move into an area, do not attempt to integrate into the community, but then whine when the community doesn't rush to help them in time of need. I can't pass judgment on him. Maybe he was a fine upstanding member of the community.

It was "property" that was destroyed, no one lost their life.

If I'm a dues paying member of this association, I wouldn't have a problem with a non member rate for people that didn't want to pay, but it's damned near impossible to have ANY funds to start or to maintain a volunteer force with no money.

That is what you would have if people didn't buy their fire tags. No fire service at all.

239 posted on 02/16/2006 7:44:15 PM PST by listenhillary ("Mainstream media" is creating it's own reality~everything sucks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: no dems

"LET ME GO ON RECORD SAYING, I don't feel sorry for this free-loading jerk.
"

You aren't very Christian then. Losing a home to fire is a much greater evil than not knowing you had a bill in an area you moved into. Even if he knew about the bill and chose not to risk it, I still feel very sorry for him. The punishment in no way fits the crime. I fully think the fire department should put things like that out and then bill him the full cost of their service. It would be substantially higher than annual dues and would still teach him a lesson. Sitting by while a man's house burned is one of the biggest jerk things I can possibly imagine.


240 posted on 02/16/2006 7:45:56 PM PST by SmoothTalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 421-431 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson