Posted on 02/16/2006 8:59:40 AM PST by americaprd
General Overview
At yesterdays House Armed Services Committee hearing on Able Danger, Congressman Curt Weldon (R-PA) repeatedly asked witnesses if a chart produced by the Land Information Warfare Activity (LIWA) / Information Dominance Center (IDC) on Chinese front companies operating within the United States played a role in the dismantlement of Able Danger. The answer was consistently yes.
What exactly was this document that was developed and what were the implications of it for the Clinton Administration? As you will see, the information raised serious questions for the Democratic Party and the Clinton White House in regards to the transfer of sensitive military technologies to China, and how export controls were relaxed in favor of individuals and companies who gave heavily to the election campaigns of Democratic candidates and President Clinton.
In response, the Clinton Administration set about disbanding LIWA and its sister organization, Able Danger, which was investigating Al Qaeda. They wanted to sweep this information under the rug and were, for the most part, successful. But later, when word began to trickle out that Able Danger had actually uncovered some information that could have prevented the 9/11 attacks, Democrats loyal to the Clinton Administration were shocked. They could not let the truth come out about Able Danger and its successes, or else they would have to answer for why the group was disbanded. The reason, of course, being that Able Danger and LIWA were dismantled to cover up the Clinton Administrations complicity in transferring technology to China.
In short, Able Danger was a collateral victim of the successes of the data mining efforts being performed by LIWA. 9/11 could have been prevented if the Clinton Administration had not disbanded Able Danger and LIWA, which it did to cover up very embarrassing information that the data mining efforts of LIWA were uncovering in regards to China.
History
In mid-1999, Congressman Weldon requested that LIWA develop a chart of Chinese front companies operating within the United States. The results were staggering, showing a complex web of organizations within the United States, including major U.S. defense contractors, who were involved in the transfer of sensitive technologies to Communist China. It also showed how Chinese agents had successfully funneled ten of million of dollars in campaign contributions to the DNC and President Clintons reelection campaign.
An accompanying timeline developed by LIWA was equally shocking, showing how the Clinton Administration had liberalized exports rules for a number of extremely sensitive dual use technologies that China could utilize for military purposes. These included very advanced encryption technologies that made it harder for our intelligence community to do its job and rocket technology that allowed China to increase the range of its offensive intercontinental ballistic missiles. China in turn, then transferred these technologies to others nations that included Iran, Syria, Libya and Pakistan. (see page 3 of the timeline
Weldon does an excellent job of outlining the revelation showed by the chart and timeline developed by LIWA showed. Briefly, the cumulative impact of the Clinton Administrations actions in exchange for campaign contributions, allowed China to:
o Develop reliable Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles with insights into MIRVing that ICBM force.
o Miniaturize nuclear warheads.
o Implement a command and control structure for its growing ICBM force.
o Develop an integrated command, control, communications, computer and intelligence encrypted network to enable better military command and control over vast areas, even beyond China itself.
o Improve power projection for its surface fleets, submarines, and long-range cruise missiles capable of hitting not only Taiwan, but also Japan from mainland China.
o Produce more proficient fighter and bomber aircraft capable of greater distances and speeds.
This was impeachable material and it scared the hell out of the Clinton Administration. But ultimately, Weldon was shouting into the wind, as the mainstream media largely ignored these explosive findings and instead relied on the somewhat whitewashed findings of the Cox Report. Weldon, you may recall, was in fact a member of the Cox Commission, but he was unsuccessful in his efforts to have this data included in the report, and was instead relegated to putting this information out independently.
Why did the Cox Commission ignore this data? Because it could have caused embarrassing questions for Republicans as well as Democrats. In fact, attempts were even made by conservatives perhaps fed by Clintonites within the Department of Defense -- to discredit Weldon by linking him to campaign contributions that he accepted from defense companies that were involved in the transfer of sensitive technologies. Never mind the fact that it was Weldon who had revealed this information to begin with. Interested parties needed to paint him with a broad brush to discredit him with the mainstream media. Weldons decision to go independent also seemed to rankle Republican leadership, as he was passed over for a slot of on the coveted House Intelligence committee, presumably because he was not a team player.
But while the information was largely ignored by the media and the powers that be that put together the Cox Report, the Clinton Administration took notice. They promptly undertook efforts to hamstring and ultimately dismantle LIWA and other data mining operations. That included Able Danger.
I believe that when Able Danger began to uncover Al Qaeda links and cells operating within the United states, they had already become known as a persona non grata, both within the intelligence community and among other federal agencies. The Clinton Administration had already begun efforts to slowly and quietly dismantle these programs, and word was filtering through the federal bureaucracy. The poor treatment of these data mining operations and the intelligence they were collecting may have may also have been partially due to the fact that other agencies were threatened by the good work being performed by these data mining operations and saw it as encroaching on their turf. I believe it was a confluence of both factors, with the Clinton Administration cronies playing on the jurisdictional and turf issues as a way of ensuring that LIWA and Able Danger were ultimately scrapped.
As a result Able Danger and its work were quietly folded -- until the 9/11 Commission began soliciting information from federal employees on the work they were performing on pre 9/11 intelligence and Al Qaeda. They, in effect, had opened a can of worms when they began talking to people about Able Danger. To include information on Able Danger in the 9/11 Commission report would require an explanation of why their work had been halted.
I suspect some of the connections on the charts developed by LIWA included unsavory links to prominent Republicans, as well as democrats, which was why it was not included in the Cox Commission Report (I have heard that Condoleezza Rice was one such person.) There may very well have been no real, credible connection, but simply the inference that there were connections may have been alarming for Republicans.
Rather than revisit an issue that would reap irreparable harm on both parties, Republican and Democratic members of the 9/11 Commission opted to omit any references to Able Danger. Perhaps they justified it in their own minds as something that could not be fixed in hindsight and for the good of the country was best not made public. Once that decision was made, it became imperative for the bureaucracy to continue to stick to the line. Otherwise, it would reveal a cover up of monumental proportions.
Former members of the Clinton Administration and DNC clearly have the most to lose in this information being made public. In fact, Weldon is now facing a tough race this cycle from former Vice Admiral Joseph Sestak, a member of President Clintons National Security Council during the time frame in question. He represents the highest ranking "Fighting Dem" seeking a seat in Congress. Governor Edward Rendell, former chair of the DNC, also cleared out two of Sestak's primary opponents in the past two weeks to provide him with a clearer shot at Weldon. In a district that voted for Kerry last Presidential election cycle, former members of the Clinton Administration may defeat Weldon and finally be successful in putting Able Danger to rest once and for all.
I nominate Tony Snow. He was hot on the Barrett Report and pestered the repubs in congress to keep the dems from dumping the whole report.
You're really enjoying watching me pop a vein in my temple, aren't ya?
Why do you think the "current admin" is trying to bury Able Danger ..?? I don't see any evidence to support that conclusion.
After all .. it was Rumsfeld who rescued Lt. Shaffer and kept him from being railroaded.
bump
Re 44 -
Anyone who crosses the Klinton Syndicate risks ending up in Ft. Gacey Park, or having something else "unfortunate" happening to them.
What ever happened to that Lt. Col. - "Scheafer", I think it was, who was on a couple of the talk radio programs last Summer talking about his work on Able Danger?
The last I knew the Military was court-martialling him for stealing a ball point pen from his Father's Embassy office when he was about 11 years old... he's probably serving 20 years to life in San Quentin for that.
Whatever they did, they seem to have shut him up pretty effecively. I wonder if anyone has seen or heard from him at all for the last several months?
Weldon Delivers Floor Speech Providing Additional Information Related to the Cox Committee Report (06/08/99) http://web.archive.org/web/19991013233050/www.house.gov/curtweldon/floor_060899.htm
INFORMATION RELATIVE TO THE COX REPORT
(from the Congressional Record, Proceedings of the U.S. House of Representatives)
Tuesday, June 8, 1999
The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mrs. Biggert). Under the Speaker's announced policy of January 6,
1999, the gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. Weldon) is recognized for 60 minutes.
Mr. WELDON of Pennsylvania. Madam Speaker, I rise tonight to continue to provide for our
colleagues in the House and for the constituents that they represent across the country information relative to the Cox report and the way this report is being spun by this administration.
snip
We need to have this administration come clean, give us the uncensored text of what Charles LaBella said to Louis Freeh which only went to Janet Reno. When that happens, we will then know the true extent of the China connection and its impact with this administration.
And .. of course that MO continued on the 9/11 commission by the persons of Gorelick and some other guy - can't remember his name - can see his face - darn! But .. those 2 people were on the 9/11 commission specifically to protect the Clintons from this exposure.
I'm glad to see this is finally seeing the light of day.
And .. don't give up on Fox. Sometimes they hold back waiting to make sure they have their facts straight before they start working on a story. And .. somebody may already be working on a story .. but Fox has been known to keep those investigations quiet until they have enough info for a good story. That's what they did with the oil-for-food scandal. They never went public with it until after they had established a clear line of obvious guilt.
More News that will never appear in the NEW YORK TIMES!
Well .. by being run out of town, I meant out of office and out of power. What they do with him then I don't care. I just want him out of power; at the very least stripped of his security clearance and forbidden to leave the country; with his law license revoked forever.
bttt
The Impact of Foreign Influences on the Clinton Administration,
National Security, And National/International Policy
A Critical Review of the Evidence as Compiled By Citizens of Freerepublic.com, back in the day....
Thanks for the ping!
There's some amazing information in this article and in the comments. Not a mention of these hearings on MSM.
Clinton sold us out on Security secrets to the chinese. Bush is selling us out on the economic front. Two peas in a pod.
That's what you get when your choices for office are a globalist and a globalist. You get one with no ethics and one with enough to know better.
I couldn't help but notice that a lot of the old timers from FR have begun to show up on this thread with their constant doom and gloom .. how America is about to go under and oh woe is me attitude.
I'm sick of it! I'm not buying all the gloom and doom stuff! This is no time to be running America into the ground. America is not a congressional group who have gotten off tract .. WE'RE AMERICA .. not congress.
We still have our principals .. we still have our values and our pride in ourselves, our accomplishments, our military, and in what America really stands for.
The media does not "shape public opinion" any more. We must not be afraid to push the issue of exposing this corrupt outfit called the Clinton admin. They deserve to be exposed - and anybody - ANYBODY - who collaborated with them deserves to be exposed too - and if they're embarrassed - it's too darn stinking bad - they should have thought of that before they got involved in this.
We need to get on the email and letter writing campaign and set the congress straight! GET YOUR ACT TOGETHER - or we will get people to replace you who will act responsibly.
Rush has told us over and over and over - when you CALL YOUR LOCAL REPS - THEY LISTEN. They won't change if we don't hold them accountable. Don't be sending blast faxes to every tom, dick or harry .. just send msgs to your reps - and I don't care if they are dems; some of mine are too. CALL THEIR LOCAL OFFICE - I only call my reps office here in San Diego - and I always get results and a response.
Don't allow the "it's all over for America - we're gonna be taken over by the Arabs or the Mexicans" sway you from doing YOUR JOB - hold your reps accountable for what they're doing and saying. Don't allow people to steal your zeal for changing things; don't allow them to cause you to stop working to change America for the better; don't allow them to force you into throwing up your hands and giving up.
NO!! HELL NO!! We need to get mad as hell - and let them know we're not going to take it anymore.
If you had been paying attention - Rumsfeld rescued him and restored his salary and medical - and shut down the harrassment.
Geeeee .. does that sound like the Bush admin is trying to stall this thing ..?? Not to me!
Who gives a rip if it's in the NYT - they never print the truth anyway. Good grief!
"Bush is selling us out on the economic front."
Can you give me your evidence to support that claim ..??
This economy is the best we've seen in over 10 years .. and you think that means Bush is selling us out ..??
Your comment doesn't hold water!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.