To: qam1
I wonder if going into a marriage defensively will ironically contribute to a divorce later.
While I can see certain advantages to a prenup, I also see the hidden message: that you don't trust your spouse.
13 posted on
02/15/2006 6:17:10 PM PST by
MoochPooch
(A righteous person worries about his or her behavior, an extremist about everyone else's.)
To: MoochPooch
"I wonder if going into a marriage defensively will ironically contribute to a divorce later"
Maybe this is a bad analogy, but I keep thinking of words like "regulation" and "manipulation" and "control" when I hear prenup. And those are Democrat words. The 'rats always have to control every little thing.
19 posted on
02/15/2006 6:25:17 PM PST by
jdm
(You can learn a lot about paranoids just by following them around.)
To: MoochPooch
" I also see the hidden message: that you don't trust your spouse."
Given the existing state of family law, and how it is impacting people, the only meaning left to the word "trust" is that of a legal arrangement, like "revocable trust" or "irrevocable trust", or maybe "in god we trust" on the money - but fiat money, too, is a legal arrangement. All other meanings have been irrevocably lost in the mists of time.
29 posted on
02/15/2006 6:44:02 PM PST by
GSlob
To: MoochPooch
Nooooo.....my husband had an EX-spouse...i.e. woman he didn't trust....so I gladly signed a pre-nup....that was 21 plus years ago.....If people REALLY are in it with committment....I don't see what the problem is.
38 posted on
02/15/2006 8:05:53 PM PST by
goodnesswins
(Too many idiots....so little time.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson