[Anti-Bubba182]

The bold seems to me to be an explicit admission, and I am sure there is more, but MSM is spinning this as expected.

[My2Cents]

This is nonsense...Saddam didn't have any WMDs. /leftist spin

[Darkwolf377]

Spin, spin, spin!

This report makes Saddam look like a good guy, while the ABC tapes made it look like Saddam was the source of the WMD.

[KSCITYBOY]

mark

[LiteKeeper]

Take That Cindy, and friends

[Reaganesque]

“What the tapes show is that between the first gulf war and the second gulf war, Saddam Hussein had not lost his appetite for, or interest in, weapons of mass destruction,” says Gary Milhollin of the Wisconsin Project, an advocacy group working to slow the spread of weapons of mass destruction. “To the contrary, he was almost obsessed by them.’’

So even if there weren't any WMD, which seems more and more unlikely given this new evidence, it is now absolutely clear that he had every intention of getting them again in the near future.

Why the Left decided to politicize the lack of WMDs when they knew full well that it was still an open question is beyond me. They completely committed to the attack that said Bush lied about WMD despite not being sure of the facts. Many of these libs are lawyers and for lawyers it is common knowledge that you don't ask questions of witnesses that you don't already know the answer to. Just plain dumb.

[indcons]

Mega BUMP