Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DeLay campaign lashes out at a primary foe (DeLay goes Negative on Tom Campbell [R-Sugar Land])
Houston Chronicle ^ | Feb. 15, 2006, 2:46AM | KRISTEN MACK

Posted on 02/15/2006 9:40:33 AM PST by SolidSupplySide

DeLay campaign lashes out at a primary foe Campbell called an 'outsider,' but an aide says he's a 'citizen politician'

U.S. Rep. Tom DeLay, forced onto the political defensive by ethical and legal charges, went on the offensive Tuesday, claiming one of his Republican primary opponents has overstated his GOP credentials.

DeLay's campaign said challenger Tom Campbell, a lawyer, has not been active in local party politics and has not voted regularly in Republican primaries.

"Every day he proves he's nothing more than an outsider who isn't concerned with conservative issues or fighting for the priorities of Texas taxpayers," DeLay campaign manager Chris Homan said of Campbell.

Campbell's campaign countered that no pure GOP insider would dare challenge the powerful DeLay, even if he has been weakened by a Travis County indictment relating to campaign finance and a federal investigation into his relationship with disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff.

"The fact is that Tom Campbell is like you and me. He is not a career politician like Tom DeLay. He is a citizen politician," said Michael Stanley, Campbell's campaign chairman. "Tom Campbell calls on Tom DeLay to get beyond the negative, immaterial distractions and get back to the real issues that are important to the people of the district."

Republican Party officials in Fort Bend and Harris County, who have close ties to DeLay, said they had neither seen nor heard of Campbell before he filed for office.

"We wouldn't have called him a conservative as far as being a Texas Republican," said Michael Wolfe, chairman of the Harris County Republican Party's candidate's committee.

Campbell is not in agreement with the Texas Republican Party platform, Wolfe said, citing Campbell's stance against a plank to abolish the Internal Revenue Service and another that states children born in the United States of illegal immigrants should be barred from citizenship.

DeLay, who was unopposed in the 2004 primary and won with 80 percent of the vote in 2002, has said he takes all political challenges seriously. His campaign's attacks on Campbell suggest that he wants to head off any groundswell of support for the challenger, an analyst said.

"Is Campbell a threat to DeLay? I find it hard to believe Mr. Campbell is going to win a primary against DeLay. But he doesn't have to win to do damage to DeLay," said Rice University political scientist Bob Stein. "DeLay needs to win with a substantial number of votes, so he can demonstrate that he is the standard-bearer for his party."

The other Republican primary candidates in the 22nd Congressional District are former school teacher Pat Baig and lawyer Michael Fjetland.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: delay; sleepers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 next last
To: fortheDeclaration

I don't know who you are talking about being pro-abortion.


81 posted on 02/18/2006 1:24:40 PM PST by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii

Lampson the dem is pro abortion.


82 posted on 02/18/2006 1:26:36 PM PST by TXBSAFH (Proud Dad of Twins, What Does Not Kill You Makes You Stronger!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration
Will do.

It might require a little effort on your part, to read up, etc...but such is politics.

True Delay is a familiar face. Thats definately for sure. Campbell is working uphill thats for sure.

83 posted on 02/18/2006 1:29:10 PM PST by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: SolidSupplySide

The last time I saw him speak of it, the roof caved in on him about 3 days later ( dem and rino tag team). Like I said people know what he stands for.


84 posted on 02/18/2006 1:29:52 PM PST by monkeywrench (Deut. 27:17 Cursed be he that removeth his neighbor's landmark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: TXBSAFH

Who is voting for that guy? he would flunk my smell test with that one too.


85 posted on 02/18/2006 1:30:12 PM PST by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: TXBSAFH
I went to Lampson's website.

You would not even know he running as a Democrat!

I do not even see any reference to the Democratic Party.

http://www.lampson.com/

Ofcourse, what Lampson doesn't want you to know is that a vote for him is a vote for Pelosi for Speaker of the House.

Also, I did not see anything on the 2nd Amendment or abortion.

If you have a link to his views on these issues I would appreciate it.

86 posted on 02/18/2006 1:31:37 PM PST by fortheDeclaration (Gal. 4:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii
I don't know who you are talking about being pro-abortion.

I was talking about Nick Lampson, the Democrat candidate.

87 posted on 02/18/2006 1:32:56 PM PST by fortheDeclaration (Gal. 4:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii
Here is his website address,

http://tcampbell.com/

88 posted on 02/18/2006 1:34:40 PM PST by fortheDeclaration (Gal. 4:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii

Disregard my last post, that was the wrong Tom Campbell.


89 posted on 02/18/2006 1:36:13 PM PST by fortheDeclaration (Gal. 4:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration

http://www.campbellcongress.com/home.htm


90 posted on 02/18/2006 1:36:47 PM PST by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii
Except for GW Bush.

How much bashing does Bush get from the liberals despite the "New Tone" and "Compassionate Conservatism"

You know what's ironic - the two Republicans the Left has hated the most, GWB and Nixon, are the ones who supported and/or implemented most of their socialist agenda. Bottom line is that it does Republicans no good to appease liberals, as Campbell will find out the hard way assuming he defeats both DeLay and the Rat opponent in the general.

91 posted on 02/18/2006 1:37:05 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Tagline removed by Moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii
Here is the correct Tom Campbell

http://www.campbellcongress.com/

92 posted on 02/18/2006 1:37:27 PM PST by fortheDeclaration (Gal. 4:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration

I know people who I trust who lived in his district in the 90's, he was redistricted out of his seat in 2003. They are the souce of my info.


93 posted on 02/18/2006 1:41:14 PM PST by TXBSAFH (Proud Dad of Twins, What Does Not Kill You Makes You Stronger!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration

Read some there then tell me what you think.


94 posted on 02/18/2006 1:42:24 PM PST by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Two wrongs don't make a right.

They hate GW. Let them.

We should win with class.

Having class is not appeasement.

95 posted on 02/18/2006 1:44:00 PM PST by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii
Thanks for the link.

Here is what Campell said about the charges against Delay.

Campbell says that 22nd District Republicans should not be lulled into the political rhetoric that this campaign is about the “irresponsible and politically motivated” district attorney Ronnie Earle. “For the record, I do not believe that Tom’s conduct for which he has been indicted at the state level will be sustained by a conviction,” Campbell says. “I fully expect the charges to be dismissed or for Tom to be acquitted.”
http://www.campbellcongress.com/background.htm

As for his political views, he looks like a solid conservative.

96 posted on 02/18/2006 1:45:22 PM PST by fortheDeclaration (Gal. 4:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: TXBSAFH
I know people who I trust who lived in his district in the 90's, he was redistricted out of his seat in 2003. They are the souce of my info.

Thanks, I will attempt to track down his actual voting record and see what it reveals.

97 posted on 02/18/2006 1:47:33 PM PST by fortheDeclaration (Gal. 4:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: fortheDeclaration

Thats what I am getting at. Honest debate. Once we're all on that level then we are good to go.


98 posted on 02/18/2006 1:48:23 PM PST by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii
Thats what I am getting at. Honest debate. Once we're all on that level then we are good to go.

Fine with me.

That is why we have primaries, to elect the best candidate to represent the Party.

99 posted on 02/18/2006 1:52:53 PM PST by fortheDeclaration (Gal. 4:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: TXBSAFH

If he is pro-baby killing, he is not a conservative. He is on the same side as Hillery on that central issue. He will get none of the conservative Christian vote.


100 posted on 02/18/2006 1:54:00 PM PST by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson