Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Teacher Unions Are Killing the Public Schools
Real Clear Politics ^ | Feb 15, 2005 | John Stossel

Posted on 02/15/2006 9:04:43 AM PST by upchuck

February 15, 2006
Teacher Unions Are Killing the Public Schools
By John Stossel


Bosses, have I got an idea for you: Don't pay your best employees more, don't ease out your least productive workers, and for crying out loud, never fire anyone, not even for the most blatant misconduct on the job.

It works for the public schools, doesn't it?

Actually, it doesn't, but since they're government monopolies, they don't care. They never go out of business. They just keep doing what they're doing, year after year, churning out class after class of students handicapped by a poor education.

Don't get me wrong -- not all public school teachers are bad. Many are talented and passionate, even heroic. Many turn down better-paying jobs because they want to help kids learn. But working hard for public-school students has to be its own reward, because a lazy teacher is paid just as much as a good one -- more if he has seniority.

What is the result? When we asked students about their teachers, some said things like this:

"Most of the teachers they're like -- they don't really care."

"One of my teachers tells me he does this for the health benefits."

"I've seen teachers come to school intoxicated."

Joel Klein once won fame as a fighter of monopolies. He worked for the federal government, and his most famous foe was Microsoft. Now he runs a monopoly of his own: the New York City public schools. It's even more arrogant than Microsoft, because its customers have even less choice.

Joel Klein now presides over a calcified monopoly where it's hard to fire anyone for anything.

One New York teacher decided that one of his 16-year-old students was hot. So he sat down at a computer and sent a sexual e-mail to Cutee101.

"He admits this," said Klein. "We had the e-mail."

"You can't fire him?"

"It's almost impossible."

It's almost impossible because of the rules in the New York schools' 200-page contract with their teachers. There are so many rules that principals rarely even try to jump through all the hoops to fire a bad teacher. It took six years of expensive litigation before the teacher who wrote Cutee101 was fired. During those six years, he received more than $300,000 in salary.

"Up, down, around, we've paid him," said the chancellor. "He hasn't taught, but we've had to pay him, because that is what is required under the contract."

Hundreds of teachers the city calls incompetent, racist, or dangerous have been paid millions.

And what do they do while they get paid? They sit in rubber rooms.

They're not really made of rubber, of course. They are big, empty rooms where they store the teachers they are afraid to let near the kids. The teachers go there and sit, hang around, read magazines, and waste time. The city pays $20 million a year to house teachers in rubber rooms.

A new union contract is supposed to make it easier to fire teachers for sexual infractions, but the Byzantine rules for other offenses remain. Insane as most are, some teachers told me they support the firing rules. "You prove I'm a bad teacher!" said one. "And if you can't prove it, don't try it!"

The restrictions on firing teachers are defended as a means of protecting teachers from favoritism. But if schools and principals had to compete, good teachers would be protected by competition itself: If a principal's job depends on having good people working for him, he won't sacrifice it to give a favored incompetent a job he can't do.

Taking six years to fire a teacher doesn't do anyone any good -- except bad teachers. So why do it? The short answer is unions. The long answer is next week's column.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: education; governmentschools; homosexualagenda; nea; publiceducation; publicschools; robthechildren; schools; stossel; uaw; union; unions; usethechildren; waronkids
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: fr_freak


That works too.

If no fed dollars are used...no fed oversight.

Essentially the system needs to be made more efficient, so, we're on the same page. Cirriculum is a whole nother matter, though.


41 posted on 02/15/2006 12:38:05 PM PST by in hoc signo vinces ("Houston, TX...a waiting quagmire for jihadis. American gals are worth fighting for!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: carl in alaska
You mean you did pay your best employees more and you did fire people for misconduct?

Yes I did. Many times.

42 posted on 02/15/2006 2:16:03 PM PST by upchuck (27 out of 27 SAT questions answered correctly. http://www.collegeboard.com/apps/qotd/question)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras

"He is not a Libertarian however".

Does the capital L in Libertarian have any significance? I am not familiar with the Libertarian Party". My point was that Stossel is a fine journalist and I would believe him over most of the members of the MSM on just about any issue such as Public Education.


43 posted on 02/15/2006 2:28:07 PM PST by wmileo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
Good 4U....you can't run a business while worrying about sleazy lawyers and their cheap phony lawsuits.

(It takes guts to succeed........!)

44 posted on 02/15/2006 4:19:32 PM PST by carl in alaska (The raven watching news of the Florida recounts stirred and spoke. Quoth the raven..."NeverGore.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

A little off topic here, but I'm starting to think one of the big reasons public schools are failing is because teachers and principals are afraid of being sued for establishing discipline in school. Any kind of disciplinary action now leaves them open to lawsuits and accusations of racism, "homophobia", etc. by ethically-limited parents and their lawyers. We need school choice and then legal protection for teachers, similar to the legal reforms protecting doctors from lawsuits.


45 posted on 02/15/2006 4:25:22 PM PST by carl in alaska (The raven watching news of the Florida recounts stirred and spoke. Quoth the raven..."NeverGore.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: carl in alaska

Thank you. "Right to work laws" should be the law of the land.


46 posted on 02/15/2006 5:00:19 PM PST by upchuck (27 out of 27 SAT questions answered correctly. http://www.collegeboard.com/apps/qotd/question)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: wmileo
Does the capital L in Libertarian have any significance?

Yes. A large L denotes membership in a politcal party. Just like Democrat vs democrat or Republican vs republican.

47 posted on 02/15/2006 7:21:51 PM PST by Protagoras (If jumping to conclusions was an Olympic event, FR would be the training facility.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras

"Yes. A large L denotes membership in a politcal party. Just like Democrat vs democrat or Republican vs republican"

Thank you. Whatever John is he is also one fine journalist.


48 posted on 02/16/2006 8:32:31 AM PST by wmileo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson