Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The MSM Campaign Against Cheney
Hugh Hewitt ^ | 2/15/06 | Hugh Hewitt

Posted on 02/15/2006 8:56:14 AM PST by frankjr

Headlines:

Los Angeles Times: Hunter Suffers Setback as Criticism of Cheney Grows

The Washington Post: Cheney's Response A Concern In GOP

The New York Times: Handling of Mishap Creates Strain in the White House

The Boston Globe: Hunter shot by Cheney has a heart attack

The Globe's story is particularly breathless, saying the "sudden turn" in Harry Whittington's condition left the White House "stunned" and his "prognosis difficult."

Washington Post columnist David Ignatius opines that "arrogance of power is on display with the Bush administration," and astonishingly compares the Veep's hunting accident to Chappaquiddick and Watergate:

"Nobody died at Armstrong Ranch, but this incident reminds me a bit of Sen. Edward Kennedy's delay in informing Massachusetts authorities about his role in the fatal automobile accident at Chappaquiddick in 1969. That story, and dozens of others about the Kennedy family, illustrates how wealthy, powerful people can behave as if they are above the law. For my generation, the fall of Richard Nixon is the ultimate allegory about how power can corrupt and destroy. It begins not with venality but with a sense of God-given mission."

The MSM is unhinged, a victim of its Bush hatred, which includes of course hatred of Cheney. The idea that failure to tell the White House press corps of a hunting accident for 14 hours is in anyway similar to leaving a woman to die in a submerged car while fleeing the scene or the cover-up of Watergate is just nuts.

And the American people know it.

What the Beltway gang seems not to understand is that most of America is laughing at them, not frowning at the Veep. There isn't a single fact we haven't been told, and we don't much care if the pampered poobahs of the press got a heads up after four or 14 hours.

There isn't a cover-up, there isn't an issue, there isn't even a controversy.

There is, however, a spectacle, and it is another black eye for the MSM.

This episode doesn't resemble Chappaqquidick. It resembles Rathergate and Eason Jordon's overreach, episodes where legacy media allowed its massive blind spot to lead it into a collision with the public it seems not to understand is fully informed and mostly contemptuous of its preening and screaming.

David Gregory is playing the new Mary Mapes, and Dana Milbank the new Rather, the former obtusely, stubbornly and breathlessly believing he's got a story that's not a story, the latter revealing an animosity towards the White House so deep as to call into question his ability to even pretend to be objective again.

It will be hard for anyone to top Ignatius' comparison of this hunting accident --which was known to about 20 people within two minutes of its happening, and fully laid out to the public the next day-- with Chappaquiddick, but some will try. This is a gift to the Vice President, as the attempted exploitation of his injuring his friend by an angry, vain and partisan MSM is already transparent and already resented by the public that has long understood the deep bias of the talking heads on the tube and which has another exhibit in the long line of case studies of that bias.

I searched the online sites of the four papers above, btw, for any story of Al Gore's remarks in Saudi Arabia on Sunday in which the once and possibly future candidate for the presidency charged the United States with "terrible abuses" against Arabs in the aftermath of 9/11, and of "indiscriminately round[ing] up" of Arabs who were then held in "unforgivable" conditions.

I could find no articles on the story in the four papers.

The "Cheney cover-up" meme is wholly fabricated while the MSM itself covers for the former vice president's slander on the country made in front of a foreign audience.

Look at these numbers for total viewers from Mediabistro:

6pm: Hume: 1,448,000 / Dobbs: 745,000 / Abrams: 290,000

7pm: Shep: 1,458,000 / Blitzer: 625,000 / Hardball: 534,000 / Showbiz: 123,000

8pm: O'Reilly: 2,244,000 / Zahn: 647,000 / Countdown: 479,000 / Grace: 529,000 / On The Money: 223,000

9pm: H&C: 1,379,000 / King: 751,000 / Rita: 284,000 / Prime News: 346,000 / Mad Money: 182,000

10pm: Greta: 1,088,000 / Cooper: 594,000 / Scarborough: 293,000 / Grace: 272,000 / Deutsch: 121,000

11pm: O'Reilly repeat: 1,000,000 / Cooper: 373,000 / Situation: 169,000 / Showbiz repeat: 149,000 / On The Money repeat: 59,000

Now add to the FNC audience the huge audience for talk radio, recently described in an Arbitron research report this way:

"News/Talk/Information has the highest average listener age among the nation’s top 15 formats, yet advertisers covet the very high incomes and education levels among those listeners...."

"News/Talk/Information listeners are very likely to be married, but they’re not as likely as listeners to other formats to have children in the house. They are the most likely to own their own home, and about one-third of the base have reached or surpassed the traditional retirement age. News/Talk/Information listeners represent enthusiastic online users—they often visit newspaper, broadcast media and financial information sites. They even listen to radio stations online in large numbers. Listeners to this format are more likely to identify themselves as Republican than any of the nation’s other top formats."

Add to the FNC audience and the radio audience the blog audience, and even David Gregory should be able to understand why the public won't buy his hysteria as legit: Too many news consumers have the facts, and don't have to depend upon David and Dana and the other anti-Bushbots of the press room for spin.

The Cheney story will not work out the way the MSM wants it too because there is a huge push-back from non-left wing news sources who have already been playing the audio from the press briefings which embarasses the Gregorys of the world.

Will legacy media ever figure this out?


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bushdidit; cheney; harrywhittington; hewuzdrunk; hystericalmedia; mediabias; quailgate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: swain_forkbeard

Ok - the report I read the Sheriff was notified soon afterwards and was on the scene in a little over an hour after it happened


61 posted on 02/15/2006 1:11:54 PM PST by CIB-173RDABN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: onyx

You're not asking me out, are you?

Or does your terse response mean Cheney said he had a cold one?

I thought the televised interview was scheduled for tonight.


62 posted on 02/15/2006 1:13:06 PM PST by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: swain_forkbeard

Brit's entire interview will be aired in a little over one hour from now.

Brit has already been interviewed by Sheppard Smith and Brit said Cheney said "ONE beer with lunch."


63 posted on 02/15/2006 1:15:21 PM PST by onyx (IF ONLY 10% of Muslims are radical, that's still 120 MILLION who want to kill us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: CIB-173RDABN

You see, I kinda got duped myself. All the MSM talk about delayed notification had me thinking there was a delay in talking to the sheriff.


64 posted on 02/15/2006 1:17:04 PM PST by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: swain_forkbeard

That's just plain wrong.

Bush is the Suptreme Commander.

You may rearrange the "facts" like so much furniture,it makes zero difference.

Perfect example of "letting your own self will run riot".


65 posted on 02/15/2006 1:18:16 PM PST by CBart95
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Right. Thanks.

He had to answer that discomfitting question. You or I would. Because he's the VP, he has to answer it on national TV.


66 posted on 02/15/2006 1:22:37 PM PST by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Why is everyone allowing this?

This is the equivalent of "picking fly poop out of ground pepper".


67 posted on 02/15/2006 1:23:27 PM PST by CBart95
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: CBart95

You're losing me.


68 posted on 02/15/2006 1:23:51 PM PST by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: CBart95

WH press corps and MSM are on a hell bent mission to destroy VP and to do as much damage to this administration as possible.


69 posted on 02/15/2006 1:26:06 PM PST by onyx (IF ONLY 10% of Muslims are radical, that's still 120 MILLION who want to kill us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: swain_forkbeard

Youre too busy dreaming up fey reposites.

Contemplate the meaning of what's being said to you.

This reality. Listen up.


70 posted on 02/15/2006 1:27:06 PM PST by CBart95
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: swain_forkbeard


Brit will be interviewed by Cavuto after this commercial break.


71 posted on 02/15/2006 1:27:39 PM PST by onyx (IF ONLY 10% of Muslims are radical, that's still 120 MILLION who want to kill us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: CBart95

Too many cooks in this kitchen.


72 posted on 02/15/2006 1:30:47 PM PST by CBart95
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: swain_forkbeard
"When you shoot somebody, be ready to answer tough questions in great detail."

There is zero obligation for you, me or Dick Cheney to answer any questions from the media. The media has no "right" to information from anybody.

I think you're confusing the media with the police.

73 posted on 02/15/2006 9:32:06 PM PST by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Bonaparte

I said a few jokes, not making a career of it.

You had to expect a few jokes, I mean it is an issue that writes its own jokes. I didnt see Letterman , but he is over the top more than occassionally.


74 posted on 02/16/2006 5:05:34 AM PST by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Bonaparte

I think you're confusing you and me with our Vice-President.


75 posted on 02/16/2006 6:08:45 AM PST by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Democratshavenobrains

They mention Chappaquiddick in the hopes they can innoculate the next demo contender against his (or HER) own scandals. By playing up the hunting incident, trying to set it up as on the swimmer's stature, they pray to their secular god that the comparison will allow something truly bad to slip through later on.


76 posted on 02/16/2006 6:12:40 AM PST by MortMan (Trains stop at train stations. On my desk is a workstation...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: frankjr
Last night on 'Hardbowel', the 'Spitter and his piss-boy... David Gregory... laid the ultimate blame on George W. Bush.
77 posted on 02/16/2006 6:20:59 AM PST by johnny7 (“Iuventus stultorum magister”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frankjr

I'm sorry to disagree with you, but the Vice-President of the United States shot someone. Sure it was accidental, but still he shot somebody in a hunting accident.

The media does what it always does; fall over themselves with first "reports", then analysis and then yet even more analysis. Then they call in the party hacks/apologists from both sides to "debate and analyze" the situation further and then it degrades into a bad parody of an old SNL skit, as it always does.

I personally don't see a media conspiracy here, just the corporate media doing what they always do. I'm a minority opinion here regarding this, no doubt.


78 posted on 02/16/2006 6:28:22 AM PST by Dazedcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dazedcat
The media does what it always does...

Always???

I'm a minority opinion here regarding this, no doubt.

No doubt...

CA....

79 posted on 02/16/2006 10:45:29 AM PST by Chances Are (Whew! It seems I've once again found that silly grin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002
"I didnt see Letterman..."

Lucky you.

80 posted on 02/16/2006 10:55:58 AM PST by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson