Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The MSM Campaign Against Cheney
Hugh Hewitt ^ | 2/15/06 | Hugh Hewitt

Posted on 02/15/2006 8:56:14 AM PST by frankjr

Headlines:

Los Angeles Times: Hunter Suffers Setback as Criticism of Cheney Grows

The Washington Post: Cheney's Response A Concern In GOP

The New York Times: Handling of Mishap Creates Strain in the White House

The Boston Globe: Hunter shot by Cheney has a heart attack

The Globe's story is particularly breathless, saying the "sudden turn" in Harry Whittington's condition left the White House "stunned" and his "prognosis difficult."

Washington Post columnist David Ignatius opines that "arrogance of power is on display with the Bush administration," and astonishingly compares the Veep's hunting accident to Chappaquiddick and Watergate:

"Nobody died at Armstrong Ranch, but this incident reminds me a bit of Sen. Edward Kennedy's delay in informing Massachusetts authorities about his role in the fatal automobile accident at Chappaquiddick in 1969. That story, and dozens of others about the Kennedy family, illustrates how wealthy, powerful people can behave as if they are above the law. For my generation, the fall of Richard Nixon is the ultimate allegory about how power can corrupt and destroy. It begins not with venality but with a sense of God-given mission."

The MSM is unhinged, a victim of its Bush hatred, which includes of course hatred of Cheney. The idea that failure to tell the White House press corps of a hunting accident for 14 hours is in anyway similar to leaving a woman to die in a submerged car while fleeing the scene or the cover-up of Watergate is just nuts.

And the American people know it.

What the Beltway gang seems not to understand is that most of America is laughing at them, not frowning at the Veep. There isn't a single fact we haven't been told, and we don't much care if the pampered poobahs of the press got a heads up after four or 14 hours.

There isn't a cover-up, there isn't an issue, there isn't even a controversy.

There is, however, a spectacle, and it is another black eye for the MSM.

This episode doesn't resemble Chappaqquidick. It resembles Rathergate and Eason Jordon's overreach, episodes where legacy media allowed its massive blind spot to lead it into a collision with the public it seems not to understand is fully informed and mostly contemptuous of its preening and screaming.

David Gregory is playing the new Mary Mapes, and Dana Milbank the new Rather, the former obtusely, stubbornly and breathlessly believing he's got a story that's not a story, the latter revealing an animosity towards the White House so deep as to call into question his ability to even pretend to be objective again.

It will be hard for anyone to top Ignatius' comparison of this hunting accident --which was known to about 20 people within two minutes of its happening, and fully laid out to the public the next day-- with Chappaquiddick, but some will try. This is a gift to the Vice President, as the attempted exploitation of his injuring his friend by an angry, vain and partisan MSM is already transparent and already resented by the public that has long understood the deep bias of the talking heads on the tube and which has another exhibit in the long line of case studies of that bias.

I searched the online sites of the four papers above, btw, for any story of Al Gore's remarks in Saudi Arabia on Sunday in which the once and possibly future candidate for the presidency charged the United States with "terrible abuses" against Arabs in the aftermath of 9/11, and of "indiscriminately round[ing] up" of Arabs who were then held in "unforgivable" conditions.

I could find no articles on the story in the four papers.

The "Cheney cover-up" meme is wholly fabricated while the MSM itself covers for the former vice president's slander on the country made in front of a foreign audience.

Look at these numbers for total viewers from Mediabistro:

6pm: Hume: 1,448,000 / Dobbs: 745,000 / Abrams: 290,000

7pm: Shep: 1,458,000 / Blitzer: 625,000 / Hardball: 534,000 / Showbiz: 123,000

8pm: O'Reilly: 2,244,000 / Zahn: 647,000 / Countdown: 479,000 / Grace: 529,000 / On The Money: 223,000

9pm: H&C: 1,379,000 / King: 751,000 / Rita: 284,000 / Prime News: 346,000 / Mad Money: 182,000

10pm: Greta: 1,088,000 / Cooper: 594,000 / Scarborough: 293,000 / Grace: 272,000 / Deutsch: 121,000

11pm: O'Reilly repeat: 1,000,000 / Cooper: 373,000 / Situation: 169,000 / Showbiz repeat: 149,000 / On The Money repeat: 59,000

Now add to the FNC audience the huge audience for talk radio, recently described in an Arbitron research report this way:

"News/Talk/Information has the highest average listener age among the nation’s top 15 formats, yet advertisers covet the very high incomes and education levels among those listeners...."

"News/Talk/Information listeners are very likely to be married, but they’re not as likely as listeners to other formats to have children in the house. They are the most likely to own their own home, and about one-third of the base have reached or surpassed the traditional retirement age. News/Talk/Information listeners represent enthusiastic online users—they often visit newspaper, broadcast media and financial information sites. They even listen to radio stations online in large numbers. Listeners to this format are more likely to identify themselves as Republican than any of the nation’s other top formats."

Add to the FNC audience and the radio audience the blog audience, and even David Gregory should be able to understand why the public won't buy his hysteria as legit: Too many news consumers have the facts, and don't have to depend upon David and Dana and the other anti-Bushbots of the press room for spin.

The Cheney story will not work out the way the MSM wants it too because there is a huge push-back from non-left wing news sources who have already been playing the audio from the press briefings which embarasses the Gregorys of the world.

Will legacy media ever figure this out?


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bushdidit; cheney; harrywhittington; hewuzdrunk; hystericalmedia; mediabias; quailgate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: Democratshavenobrains

Yes but now that they have, I'd call it fair game.

www.ytedk.com


41 posted on 02/15/2006 9:50:42 AM PST by SueRae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: swain_forkbeard
Yes they are different. But both involve accidents, and both involve delayed reporting of the accidents.


What are you talking about?

The accident was reported to the proper authorities. The local sheiff was notified and he responded.

Oh, you mean it was not reported to the news media.

42 posted on 02/15/2006 9:53:44 AM PST by CIB-173RDABN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002
"This story deserved a few jokes from liberals like Jay Leno..."

Visited a friend on Monday night and Letterman was on the tube. Every 3 minutes, Letterman or one of his flunkies made reference to the Cheney incident. There was even a lewd routine about Mrs. Cheney and her "lesbian" daughter. Letterman implied that Cheney was an incompetent and unsafe hunter, that he deliberately tried to murder Whittington, that the WH was stonewalling the media, on and on. All this became the theme of the entire show, basically a Cheney family hate-fest. It was utterly disgusting, way over the top.

43 posted on 02/15/2006 9:57:45 AM PST by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: wmileo

"GOOD NEWS [JPod]

Harry Whittington is sitting up, eating normally and plans to do some work today even though he's still in the intensive-care unit."

http://corner.nationalreview.com/06_02_12_corner-archive.asp#090077


44 posted on 02/15/2006 10:03:07 AM PST by frankjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk

Yesterday, Rush was perusing the looney left sites -- apparently Cheney shot his friend to take the spotlight off Scooter Libby saying higher ups "gave him permission to leak." These people soooo need their meds.

And why do I get the feeling that Libby probably actually said "they told me they didn't have a problem if I wanted to discuss xyz with a reporter...."


45 posted on 02/15/2006 10:05:18 AM PST by Right Cal Gal (Conservatives know the names of Tookie's VICTIMS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: swain_forkbeard

Where on earth did you get the idea that public officials are somehow obligated to immediately report every unusual incident to the media?


46 posted on 02/15/2006 10:05:52 AM PST by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: frankjr
"Harry Whittington is sitting up, eating normally and plans to do some work today even though he's still in the intensive-care unit." "

Thank you.
Great news. The only thing that matters in the long run is the health of this man. The stuff which Dick Gregory is concerned about is of no concern to me.
47 posted on 02/15/2006 10:11:28 AM PST by wmileo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: wmileo

I guess (I heard on the radio) the docs are having a press conference now and it sounds like he is doing well. The docs said part of the reason they have him in ICU is for privacy reasons. I assume a news story will be out soon. Thankfully it appears he is recovering nicely. He sounds like a strong person.


48 posted on 02/15/2006 10:13:42 AM PST by frankjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Boston Blackie

Ok, lets use the Chappaquidick scenario against this episode.

First, Cheney and Harry were drinking all morning and afternoon...telling war stories...and gossiping about democrats. After a while, they wandered out into a field...where Cheney accidentally fired off a round into Harry. Cheney stood there by his buddy...for at least an hour...wondering if he save him or just let him bleed to death in the field. Eventually, Cheney walked back to the house...boozed up some more and told the secret service guys of what happened. They all wondered back to the field, and kept looking at Harry who was very much alive. Finally, as dark came....someone called the local ambulance, and they carried him to the hospital. Cheney drank all night and finally gave a explanation about the whole episode the next day to local cops who promised to cover up the episode.

Thats about how it would have happened.


49 posted on 02/15/2006 10:20:39 AM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: pepsionice

Don't forget the daily Kennedy votes in the Senate.

How many times has Teddy beeen drinking before and after his votes.


50 posted on 02/15/2006 10:22:39 AM PST by JFC (W, I am with YA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: frankjr
No one has exactly covered themselves in glory here, least of all the MSM, who truly believe they've found another "aha!" moment, because they want to believe it so badly.

That said, I don't give the Administration a totally free pass, either.

Yes, it was a true accident, and yes, the White House is yet again being battered unfairly by a media grasping at scornful straws.

And yes, the Vice President is known for his reticence with the national media, even when his purposes (and by extension, George Bush's) would be better served by being more forthcoming in a more timely manner.

Criticisms over the delay in the release of information are little more than an attempt to manufacture controversy where none exists in reality.

But it has always been so, as the White House is well aware.

Given that, the Bush Administration, after five years, is old enough to know better.

51 posted on 02/15/2006 10:26:20 AM PST by ihatemyalarmclock (actually, I have two and use them. I'm not lazy, just sleepy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Democratshavenobrains
I'm surprised they even mention Chappaquidick. The two things are so obviously different.

Absolutely Correct, Democratshavenobrains.

"...this incident reminds me a bit of Sen. Edward Kennedy's delay in informing Massachusetts authorities about his role in the fatal automobile accident at Chappaquiddick in 1969."


The authorities in the Cheney case AND the paramedics were notified almost immediately while Kennedy's inaction probably cost a women her life
52 posted on 02/15/2006 10:30:23 AM PST by RedMonqey (People who don't who stand for something, will fall for anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: frankjr

BTTT


53 posted on 02/15/2006 11:41:43 AM PST by hattend (Muslims are the only people who make feminists seem laid-back. - Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: L98Fiero

I didn't make anything up. Re-read my post.


54 posted on 02/15/2006 12:52:35 PM PST by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: CBart95

I treat Bush and Cheney as a team. I can't get into Bush vs. Cheney stuff.


55 posted on 02/15/2006 12:53:27 PM PST by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: shhrubbery!

If you re-read my post, I made clear how I feel about Cheney's integrity.


56 posted on 02/15/2006 12:55:30 PM PST by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: CIB-173RDABN

I thought there was a delay in notifying the sheriff. Maybe I'm wrong about that. It happens.

Nah, I don't care about the media's hurt feelings or sense of entitlement.


57 posted on 02/15/2006 12:57:54 PM PST by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: frankjr

The left have visions of getting W...so first they've got to knock off cheney...LOL...one word...delusional...


58 posted on 02/15/2006 12:59:38 PM PST by shield (The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge: but fools despise wisdom and instructions.Pr 1:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bonaparte

I don't have that idea. Nothing in my post indicates that I do. Perhaps you are discerning a meaning I had not intended.

Nevertheless, my primary point remains valid and unchallanged. When you shoot somebody, be ready to answer tough questions in great detail. That's fair, isn't it?


59 posted on 02/15/2006 1:01:15 PM PST by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: swain_forkbeard


ONE beer with lunch.


60 posted on 02/15/2006 1:05:01 PM PST by onyx (IF ONLY 10% of Muslims are radical, that's still 120 MILLION who want to kill us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson