Skip to comments.
Ari Fleischer Joins Criticism Of Cheney's Response to Shooting
E&P ^
| Febuary 14 2006
| Joe Strupp
Posted on 02/14/2006 5:31:24 PM PST by jmc1969
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400, 401-420, 421-440 ... 521-529 next last
To: Howlin; dirtboy
Don't tell me this is the "verbatim" quote that has been "typed in".
To: Howlin
http://www.caller2.com/2006/pdf/tpwl_accident_report.pdf
Hunter's Judgement Factors:
Victim was covered by shooter who was swinging on game.
That is what is checked off on the form. It was a safety violation. Anyone who tries to claim otherwise is friggin' clueless.
402
posted on
02/14/2006 11:04:13 PM PST
by
dirtboy
(I'm fat, I sleep most of the winter and I saw my shadow yesterday. Does that make me a groundhog?)
To: nunya bidness
You always see the good sign of everything. :-)
403
posted on
02/14/2006 11:04:21 PM PST
by
Howlin
("QUICK HE'S BLEEDING. CALL THE WASH POST!")
To: SFConservative
Yes, the conspriazoids are out claiming cover up because the VP does not want to talk right now, as I said yesterday he must be heartsick, and praying hard for his friend.
The law and local press were notified, and DC is mad that Cheney didn't have an "Oprah" moment yet!
404
posted on
02/14/2006 11:05:05 PM PST
by
roses of sharon
("I would rather men ask why I have no statue, than why I have one". ) (Cato the Elder)
To: A Citizen Reporter
I don't see any "safety rule" cited anywhere.
405
posted on
02/14/2006 11:05:34 PM PST
by
Howlin
("QUICK HE'S BLEEDING. CALL THE WASH POST!")
To: dirtboy
What safety violation? What is the state law defining that as a safety violation?
406
posted on
02/14/2006 11:06:26 PM PST
by
Howlin
("QUICK HE'S BLEEDING. CALL THE WASH POST!")
To: dirtboy
" It was a safety violation. " Now I hate to do this, dirtboy, but let's go back. YOUR WORDS were that Cheney was "Careless". That is what you are defending. Just to be clear.
To: Howlin
That is a good question we might all ask ourselves; what is Ari getting out of this?
I'm sure that Editor & Publisher called the former White House press secretaries in order to create controversy. I doubt Ari Fleisher called them. His remarks are really much ado about nothing - in hindsight, even Scott McClellan has essentially said initial reporting could and should have been handled differently. As I've said before and will undoubtedly say again, the White House almost always seems not to be proactive enough in dealing with the White House Press Corps, which is an unfortunate necessary evil in Washington.
Vice President Cheney can stop this nonsense by speaking with the press tomorrow - not necessarily the ravenous pack of egotistical jackals in the White House Press Corps, but in a one-on-one interview with somebody like Brit Hume or Neil Cavuto.
To: Luis Gonzalez
It was a stupid political blunder NOT to notify the press The press was notified
The DC Press Corp are in a snit because they weren't told first
409
posted on
02/14/2006 11:07:44 PM PST
by
Mo1
(Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists.. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
To: Howlin
I don't see any "safety rule" cited anywhere.Christ, Howlin, it's an official Texas form used to report the results of an investigation what went wrong in a hunting accident. And they checked off what went wrong. How nitpicking are you going to get here?
Are you gonna parse "is" next?
410
posted on
02/14/2006 11:08:08 PM PST
by
dirtboy
(I'm fat, I sleep most of the winter and I saw my shadow yesterday. Does that make me a groundhog?)
To: A Citizen Reporter
YOUR WORDS were that Cheney was "Careless".To any SANE person, shooting someone accidentally in the manner described is CARELESS.
Have you ever hunted?
411
posted on
02/14/2006 11:09:14 PM PST
by
dirtboy
(I'm fat, I sleep most of the winter and I saw my shadow yesterday. Does that make me a groundhog?)
To: dirtboy
If this had happened to most other people, the entire nation wouldnt know about it.
This was an incident that occurred in Cheneys private life, and was completely unrelated to his official duties, nor would it effect his job responsibilities in any way. Therefore, the Whitehouse was not under any obligation to follow any kind of official protocol in the reporting of this matter.
As I am composing this response, I have been listening to the Whitehouse press conference regarding this incident. I am again reminded of the INSANITY coming from the press. If I didnt know better, I might have thought it was THE SNL satire on the conference instead of the real thing.
To: roses of sharon
Thanks for acknowledging some reality among a sea of FReepers eating their own.
Howlin, dirtboy et al: let's get back to reality! This kind of self-annihilation is what DU is famous for and we should be above that level of crap.
To: conservative in nyc
"I'm sure that Editor & Publisher called the former White House press secretaries in order to create controversy. I doubt Ari Fleisher called them. Ding, ding, ding.
I'm not defending Ari, however, I'm not about to jump off a cliff about something that left wing E & P has published.
To: dirtboy
"in the manner described is CARELESS. Pardon me, in the manner WHO described?
To: dirtboy
Are you gonna parse "is" next? No; I'm going to ask you why you said that they had found that he violated safety rules when it's clearly listed as a contributing factor.
416
posted on
02/14/2006 11:11:48 PM PST
by
Howlin
("QUICK HE'S BLEEDING. CALL THE WASH POST!")
To: TAdams8591
If this had happened to most other people, the entire nation wouldnt know about it. However, there would still be a sheriff's report and an investigation by the state wildlife commission, even if it was Joe Blow.
Which means it is not a private matter.
And it would typically be reported in the local papers. But since Cheney is a major national political figure, it will naturally get more attention.
Is that so difficult to grasp?
417
posted on
02/14/2006 11:12:13 PM PST
by
dirtboy
(I'm fat, I sleep most of the winter and I saw my shadow yesterday. Does that make me a groundhog?)
To: A Citizen Reporter
I read the pdf; it's doesn't list it as a violation; it says "contributing factor."
418
posted on
02/14/2006 11:13:05 PM PST
by
Howlin
("QUICK HE'S BLEEDING. CALL THE WASH POST!")
To: dirtboy
Go back an look at the form. There is a whole section on safety/law violations, with nothing checked.
419
posted on
02/14/2006 11:13:05 PM PST
by
Dolphy
To: Howlin
What happened to us didn't receive nearly the attention it would have received if we had been democrats.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400, 401-420, 421-440 ... 521-529 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson