1 posted on
02/14/2006 3:27:09 PM PST by
SJackson
To: SJackson
Perhaps there is an easy way to solve our nation's economic problems. Dow hits 11,000. Unemployment @ 5.2%. And we still are in the Depression! Damn! This Meth problem is worse than I thought!
2 posted on
02/14/2006 3:29:47 PM PST by
Bommer
(Ted Kennedy - Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life!)
To: SJackson
This
Capital Times is one of the most insane cage-liners I've seen in a very long time.
Remind me to stay the hell out of Madison until it's time for the siege.
To: SJackson
Why not make it clear that corporations should have the same First Amendment rights as other citizens to contribute to campaigns? Why not to make corporations to be the full fledged persons with all the rights and abolish the status of a person for the citizens/individual human beings? That way this process will be brought to its logical conclusion.
After all the corporations represent the most productive members of the society. The mere human beings are superfluous and parasitic relic of the past.
4 posted on
02/14/2006 3:35:09 PM PST by
A. Pole
(In 2001 top 5% owned 60% of national wealth, while bottom 60% owned 4%)
To: SJackson
...they plan to eliminate government as we have known it since Franklin RooseveltHey Ed, you stupid git, that's a great idea!
8 posted on
02/14/2006 3:42:11 PM PST by
clintonh8r
(If you don't support the mission you don't support the troops. Period.)
To: SJackson
>>When you read the Bush budget, you must conclude that they don't want to trim the fat, they plan to eliminate government as we have known it since Franklin Roosevelt.<<
Yes! See http://www.house.gov/paul/nytg.htm
10 posted on
02/14/2006 3:48:58 PM PST by
kojak
To: SJackson
The author of the article seems to be blissful oblivious to the distribution of income vs percentage of total taxes paid...
What more needs to be said?
To: SJackson; Behind Liberal Lines
I thought Ithaca was Berkeley East.
12 posted on
02/14/2006 3:49:30 PM PST by
presidio9
("Bird Flu" is the new Y2K Virus -Only without the inconvenient deadline.)
To: SJackson
Darn, till he said he wasn't serious, I was getting excited!
13 posted on
02/14/2006 3:49:33 PM PST by
wizardoz
To: SJackson
OK, OK, I am not serious. Well, that's a relief. With these genius types it's kind of hard to tell. Glad he let us know.
But the Bush administration and the neocons are serious.
Not about that. See point one.
I do get the sense that some "progressives" are finally, at long last, sensing that progressivism has turned into pure reaction and that the most truly progressive individual in government is named Bush. "But it isn't progressivism as we define it!" Yeah, so what?
To: SJackson
15 posted on
02/14/2006 3:54:09 PM PST by
Fintan
(Shut up. You're rude and silly. And ugly.)
To: SJackson
When you read the Bush budget, you must conclude that they don't want to trim the fat, they plan to eliminate government as we have known it since Franklin Roosevelt. Don't we wish...???
Gracious, the moonbats are barking in Berkeley East tonight. It must be the moon...
21 posted on
02/14/2006 5:57:41 PM PST by
okie01
(The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
To: SJackson
The author of this article needs his Lithium dosage adjusted upwards, ASAP.
23 posted on
02/14/2006 7:42:11 PM PST by
GladesGuru
(In a society predicated upon Liberty, it is essential to examine principle)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
