Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats Dump Iraq War Veteran Candidate for Senate
CNSNews.com ^ | February 14, 2006 | Susan Jones

Posted on 02/14/2006 8:39:49 AM PST by SonofLiberty1

Democrats Dump Iraq War Veteran Candidate for Senate By Susan Jones CNSNews.com Senior Editor February 14, 2006

(CNSNews.com) - Paul Hackett, an Iraq war veteran hailed as a rising Democratic star by party leaders last summer, has dropped out of the race for Ohio's U.S. Senate seat, and he's not happy about it.

The New York Times reported on Tuesday that Sens. Chuck Schumer and Harry Reid forced Hackett to step aside so Rep. Sherrod Brown could run against incumbent Republican Sen. Mike DeWine.

Schumer and Reid are the same Democrats who persuaded Hackett to run last August, Hackett said. They apparently changed their minds because they think Rep. Brown stands a better chance of winning the Senate seat.

Democrat leaders want Hackett to run for a U.S. House seat instead, but he has refused.

"This is an extremely disappointing decision that I feel has been forced on me," the New York Times quoted Hackett as saying.

Hackett said Democrat leaders have been calling his donors and asking them to stop contributing to Hackett's Senate campaign. "For me, this is a second betrayal," Hackett was quoted as saying.

"First, my government misused and mismanaged the military in Iraq, and now my own party is afraid to support candidates like me."

In August, Hackett ran for the U.S. House of Representatives in a special election in Ohio. Republican Jean Schmidt defeated Hackett 52 to 48 percent, but Democrats nevertheless were buoyed by what they called Hackett's strong showing in a staunchly Republican district.

Democrat blogs were buzzing with the news of Hackett's withdrawal on Tuesday.

"I can't f*** believe this," one angry liberal wrote on a popular Democrat blogsite.

But Kos, of the Daily Kos website, said Democrats were afraid of an untested candidate in a high-profile Senate race. "To be clear," wrote the blogger, "Hackett didn't stand a chance [in the primary]. He had a tenth of Brown's money, and that was before [Democrat leaders] allegedly tried to stop Hackett's donors from giving."

Kos also noted that Brown announced his candidacy before Hackett did.

"It would have been a tough slog," he concluded.

But over at the Democratic Underground website, many bloggers expressed dismay, if not anger: This is the day the [D]emocratic [P]arty will die. It will never change, they always push the new guys out," one blogger wrote.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: hackett; queenforaday; redonred; schadenfreude
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 02/14/2006 8:39:51 AM PST by SonofLiberty1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SonofLiberty1
He dumped his fellow soldiers, he dumped his Commander in Chief, and now he's upset at being dumped.

Boo Hoo Whiney Baby.

I just love that Schumer went behind his back and told people not to donate to him.

2 posted on 02/14/2006 8:43:58 AM PST by OldFriend (The Dems enABLEd DANGER and 3,000 Americans died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SonofLiberty1

We should all say to Mr. Hackett:

"Welcome to the Republican Party"

Lord knows, the Ohio Republicans have had a bit of a struggle lately. With him and the black Attorney General who's running for governor, maybe we can put Ohio back FIRMLY in the (R) column, instead of sweating out the crap that the idiots in Cleveland (Kucinich AND Tubbs-Jones) tried on us back in '04!


3 posted on 02/14/2006 8:44:05 AM PST by ssaftler (Politically Correct isn't! Progressives aren't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SonofLiberty1

Got screwed by the commissars of the Dem party, didja??
These other vets running under Dem rubric are gonna face same fate.


4 posted on 02/14/2006 8:44:33 AM PST by JeeperFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SonofLiberty1

They know he lost in a special election where dems showed up to vote in large numbers, republicans didn't. In an off-year election, he would get his butt handed to him.


5 posted on 02/14/2006 8:45:07 AM PST by FishFace222
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ssaftler
We should all say to Mr. Hackett: "Welcome to the Republican Party"

No way!

6 posted on 02/14/2006 8:50:58 AM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ssaftler

We should all say to Mr. Hackett: "Welcome to the Republican Party"

Aren't Dewhine and Buckets Voinovich bad enough??


7 posted on 02/14/2006 8:55:22 AM PST by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ssaftler

We should all say to Mr. Hackett:

"Welcome to the Republican Party"

Paul Hackett is Cindy Sheehan-lite. He's made such rank comments against Bush and the war to achieve near treasonous status.

Anyway, the Dems. have made a mistake pulling Hackett. His sheer flamboyance as a candidate would have brought out the Democratic base in Ohio to vote for him. Sherrod Brown, whoever that is, will inspire no one. Count this seat as now a safe GOP seat.


8 posted on 02/14/2006 8:59:12 AM PST by MikeA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ssaftler

Aside from his position on Iraq, everything I have read about this guy seems to indicate he would be a conservative. I think I even recall him saying that illegal aliens in this country should be deported. I wonder if Dean had a word with him about that...


9 posted on 02/14/2006 8:59:57 AM PST by SC33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SonofLiberty1
"First, my government misused and mismanaged the military in Iraq, and now my own party is afraid to support candidates like me."

LOL!

10 posted on 02/14/2006 9:00:40 AM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SonofLiberty1
"For me, this is a second betrayal," Hackett was quoted as saying.

Fair's fair. He betrayed his fellow soliders, after all.

11 posted on 02/14/2006 9:01:17 AM PST by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("It'sTime for Republicans to Start Toeing the Conservative Line, NOT the Other Way Around!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SonofLiberty1
"I can't f*** believe this," one angry liberal wrote on a popular Democrat blogsite. "

Nice vocabulary!
12 posted on 02/14/2006 9:01:41 AM PST by jaydubya2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jaydubya2

I thnk Hackett was a Conservative in disguise and Schumer didn't want to take the chance.


13 posted on 02/14/2006 9:02:29 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz ("We don't need POLITICIANS...we need STATESMEN.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SonofLiberty1
Hackett said Democrat leaders have been calling his donors and asking them to stop contributing to Hackett's Senate campaign.

"For me, this is a second betrayal," Hackett was quoted as saying.

Only a Democrat weevil would trust these back-stabbing, lying dumb butt "crats" by believing anything they say or swear to.

Hacket why are you surprised or shocked that you have been "gilflerted" by this bunch of slime balls?

Didn't you know they devour their own being the cannibals they have proved themselves to be on every issue in doubt?

Wake up and smell the "carrion"!

14 posted on 02/14/2006 9:02:39 AM PST by VOYAGER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SonofLiberty1
Maybe Chuckie found some derogatory information on Hackett's illegally obtained credit report and was worried it would hurt his chances of winning.
15 posted on 02/14/2006 9:06:15 AM PST by jennyjenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SonofLiberty1

"When you dine with the devil, bring a long spoon."


16 posted on 02/14/2006 9:06:24 AM PST by talleyman (Kerry & the Surrender-Donkey Treasoncrats - trashing the troops for 40 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SonofLiberty1

Looks like affirmative action to me.


17 posted on 02/14/2006 9:06:32 AM PST by BIGZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SC33
Aside from his position on Iraq, everything I have read about this guy seems to indicate he would be a conservative

Supposedly he is pro-2nd amendment, but is very anti-business.

He is also pro-homosexual marriage. I guess he's a hybrid of Buchanan and hillary.

18 posted on 02/14/2006 9:06:42 AM PST by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ssaftler
With him and the black Attorney General who's running for governor

Ken Blackwell...learn to say his name and not his skin color.

19 posted on 02/14/2006 9:09:46 AM PST by smith288 (The older I get, the dumber I become as im wise enough to acknowledge how much more there is to know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SonofLiberty1
"First, my government misused and mismanaged the military in Iraq, and now my own party is afraid to support candidates like me."

No where for a passionate liberal to turn, is there? Time to start a third party, Paul.
20 posted on 02/14/2006 9:13:37 AM PST by rightwingintelligentsia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson