Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hamas expects an invitation to Baghdad from Iraqi prime minister-designate Ibrahim al-Jaafari
DEBKAfile Exclusive ^ | February 13, 2006, 6:45 PM (GMT+02:00)

Posted on 02/13/2006 4:07:19 PM PST by strategofr

Our sources in Baghdad report Hamas leaders are making a point of being received and recognized by an Arab government backed to the hilt and sustained by the US government and army.

Saudi Arabia and Iran are urging Jaafari to invite Hamas leaders as a show of independence.

DEBKAfile’s counter-terror sources note: An invitation from the democratically-elected government in Baghdad to a democratically-elected Palestinian (terrorist) party would place the Washington in a cleft stick, after having initiated both elections.

Cooperation between the only two elected Arab regimes would be hard to challenge. On the other hand, since Hamas is listed as a terrorist group in the US and Europe, such cooperation would show the Bush administration as having placed democratic reform in the Middle East ahead of the global war on terror and at its expense.

Israel’s efforts to internationally isolate a Hamas government would not have much chance if Baghdad invited the terror group’s leaders in the wake of a lengthening list of capitals started by Moscow, Ankara, Cairo, Riyadh, Kuwait, Oman and Qatar.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; Israel; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: aljaafari; hamas; iraq; us
Very bad, if correct.
1 posted on 02/13/2006 4:07:21 PM PST by strategofr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: strategofr
When I saw Kuwait and Qatar in the list it already is bad, but Iraq would make it worse.
2 posted on 02/13/2006 4:18:06 PM PST by madconserv (Proud to be FReepin--Support Our Troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: strategofr

"On the other hand, since Hamas is listed as a terrorist group in the US and Europe, such cooperation would show the Bush administration as having placed democratic reform in the Middle East ahead of the global war on terror and at its expense."

Huh? So if we don't dictate to the Iraqi govt. who they can and can't invite in to their country for diplomatic purposes Bush is suddenly "soft on terrorism?" Wow, great liberal lapdog media "logic" there. This is a brain fart twist in logic rarely before matched in the pantheon of liberal stupidity. I guess overthrowing a regime, i.e. Saddam Hussein's which topped the State Dept.'s list of terrorist regimes isn't sign enough for these idiots that maybe Bush is serious about taking on terrorism...or our aggressive efforts at taking down Al Qaeda. I suppose these same idiots will say Bush is being too aggressive against terrorism by wiretapping Al Qaeda suspects in the US. But if we don't tell an independent and sovereign govt. who they can and can't have visit, we're tantamount to the French in terms of surrendering. Sheesh, this guy must have bought some really bad weed.


3 posted on 02/13/2006 4:34:33 PM PST by MikeA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson