Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Did Dick Cheney Break the No.1 Rule of Hunting?
Time Magazine ^ | 02/13/2006 | Timothy Burger

Posted on 02/13/2006 10:38:19 AM PST by SirLinksalot

How Did Dick Cheney Break the No.1 Rule of Hunting?

For veteran sportsmen like the vice president, safety is a core value

By TIMOTHY J. BURGER/WASHINGTON

The cardinal rule of hunting could not be more simple: Don’t shoot the people (or the dogs). If there’s anyone in Washington who knows this, one would have thought it would be Vice President Dick Cheney, who accidentally shot his friend and fellow hunter Harry Whittington, 78, late Saturday afternoon. Whittington is expected to recover from his injuries, but the question will linger on: how does an accident like this happen among hunters with so much experience?

For years, Cheney's take-charge public image has been bolstered by photos of him fly fishing in Wyoming and stories about Cheney jetting into hunting hotspots for quail, pheasant and other game. While serving as a congressman from Wyoming — before President Bush’s father tapped him for secretary of defense in 1989 — Cheney was a solid ally of the National Rifle Association, the staunch defender of gun rights, which also preaches gun safety.

Cheney frequently hunts ducks in Arkansas, Texas and South Dakota. His hunting career had been relatively smooth until controversy arose after he was reported to have taken conservative Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia hunting in Louisiana in 2004, just after the Court had agreed to hear a case involving the secrecy of documents related to the Vice President’s 2001 work heading an energy task force. (Cheney was in favor of keeping them secret.)

Cheney also drew attention for reportedly shooting ducks and some 70 pen-raised pheasants at the exclusive Rolling Rock Club in southwestern Pennsylvania in December 2003. Experts were quoted at the time as saying there’s nothing wrong, legally at least, with blasting away at stocked birds. But depending on how and when they are released, it should not be confused with actual hunting, since disoriented birds placed in the field or released in front of the shooters are often neither as wary or elusive as wild quarry.

An eyewitness account reported by the Associated Press suggests that Cheney may have, in the heat of the moment, violated the No. 1 rule of hunting by failing to keep track of his hunting buddies at all times. The AP quoted the ranch's owner saying that Cheney could easily have failed to see Whittington, as the latter walked up behind the Vice President from lower ground and in tall grass. To be sure, safety should be paramount for everyone in a hunting party and some responsibility would have fallen to Whittington to make sure his fellow hunters knew he might be just out of sight behind them. But for the shooter, hunting safety dictates that focusing on the target should never be more important than keeping in mind what's behind it.

Accidents can happen, of course, in a single careless moment. Quail, when you find them and they flush, don’t exactly follow gun-safety rules. They fly up suddenly and may go in any direction. And the first thing that happens to the hunter is the adrenaline rush. That’s why quail hunters wear orange, as Cheney's group reportedly were. And that’s why experts counsel the hunter not to sweep the shotgun around and fire if they don’t know what’s in the line of fire. Knowing what's behind the target is also a rule with which, one can bet, Cheney’s Secret Service detail would have wanted Whittington himself to be intimate.

What probably spared Whittington more critical injury was the tiny size of birdshot being used on the hunt; quail are typically hunted with No. 8 shot, which is even smaller than BBs. After the accident, Whittington's face "looks like chicken pox, kind of. He's so lucky, it's a miracle," Whittington's daughter Sally told the Dallas Morning News. Cheney visited Whittington in the hospital the next day. The vice president "feels so bad," said Sally Whittington. "He's a very accomplished hunter. He was obviously relieved to see how well my father was doing."

If Cheney now finds himself criticized or lampooned, he'll ironically be in the same position he himself put Senator John Kerry in during the final days of the 2004 Presidential campaign, though the circumstances then did not involve a potentially deadly accident. At the time, Cheney used his widely-known experience as a hunter to mock a duck-hunting foray in Ohio in which Senator John Kerry ended up shooting a goose. "The senator who gets a grade of 'F' from the National Rifle Association went hunting this morning," Cheney reportedly said, to hoots. "I understand he bought a new camouflage jacket for the occasion, which did make me wonder how regularly he does go goose hunting.” As the Texas incident shows, experience does not make hunters immune to accidents, which is why hunting advocacy groups put such a relentless focus on safety as the top priority.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: accident; bang; cheney; harrywhittington; hunting; quailgate; rule
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 301-306 next last
To: LOC1

Bingo. And, contrary to those who want this to be about 'bashing the President', this is about sending the right message about firearms safety in the most publicized hunting accident story in quite a while. And the right message does not come from blaming the guy who was accidentally shot.


121 posted on 02/13/2006 11:57:58 AM PST by lugsoul ("Try not to be sad." - Laura Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: G.Mason
Unless you are hunting a treeless prairie, it is impossible to see many ground objects when aiming at a flying object. Hills, gullys, trees all come into a general view.

Uh, I am not talking about worrying about a house a half-mile away when I am shooting 8-shot.

HOWEVER, if you are shooting into a line of trees, and am not sure if there are houses just behind the line, that is negligent.

Whittington announced he was leaving the "line". Upon his return, from the rear, he made no such announcement.

See post #101. The other hunters should not have progressed to get the next covey until Whittington came back to the line.

122 posted on 02/13/2006 11:58:20 AM PST by dirtboy (I'm fat, I sleep most of the winter and I saw my shadow yesterday. Does that make me a groundhog?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: XeniaSt
"Whittington failed to follow safe protocol in upland bird hunting."


There are more than a few of us that understand this.

The fact is, there are also many who haven't a clue of what they are talking about.

Par for the course. ;)





123 posted on 02/13/2006 11:58:38 AM PST by G.Mason (Duty, Honor, Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan

I tell you what, after some of the responses I've seen on this subject, this might be a good time to make an inventory of "freepers I would never go hunting with".


124 posted on 02/13/2006 11:59:09 AM PST by dirtboy (I'm fat, I sleep most of the winter and I saw my shadow yesterday. Does that make me a groundhog?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

have it your way


125 posted on 02/13/2006 11:59:37 AM PST by G.Mason (Duty, Honor, Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

I'm sure all the sporting hunters over at Time Magazine would never break the 'cardinal rule of hunting'. No never. Especially on all their forays into New York City's Central Park for the excellent pigeon hunting.


126 posted on 02/13/2006 11:59:47 AM PST by aligncare (Watergate killed journalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G.Mason

I've hunted plenty, more waterfowl than upland birds but an occasional upland hunt. Which is why I know that you don't blame the guy you shot for your own failure to know your field of fire. Those who are blaming Whittington are the ones who don't know jack, and are sending a very WRONG message about hunting and gun safety.


127 posted on 02/13/2006 12:00:50 PM PST by lugsoul ("Try not to be sad." - Laura Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

"No, the first rule of hunting is to make sure you won't hit something other than what you are aiming at. Even if you have a moron in range, it is your responsibility to make sure you don't hit them - especially when they are wearing orange."



Agreed. Why are excuses being made because it's Cheney? Remember - guns don't kill/injure people. People do. In this case, the person is Cheney who is responsible.


128 posted on 02/13/2006 12:01:29 PM PST by Blzbba (Sub sole nihil novi est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg

From King of the Hill:

"I didn't know it was loaded" is not an acceptable excuse. "I wasn't there" or "I never met those people" are better excuses.


129 posted on 02/13/2006 12:01:44 PM PST by JillValentine (Dictatorships in movies tend to be right-wing. Dictatorships in real life tend to be left-wing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Jrabbit
When a hunter shoots at a bird, why doesn't the birdshot all go towards the target? Is it supposed to "spray" out in all directions? Why?

You want the shot to spread out in a pattern to increase your chances of hitting a bird on the wing. The amount of spread related to the choke. Some chokes are meant for close-in hunting and the pattern widens quickly. Conversely, if you are hunting geese, you would want a tighter choke so the shot doesn't spread out as fast, since you are typically shooting at a bird further away.

Was the bird that Cheney was shooting at only 5-6 feet up in the air? How far out does the birdshot spray and is it smaller than a BB?

Quail tend to stay closer to the ground, as opposed to doves which will try to rise up higher.

130 posted on 02/13/2006 12:02:51 PM PST by dirtboy (I'm fat, I sleep most of the winter and I saw my shadow yesterday. Does that make me a groundhog?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: geopyg
The owner of the property said that Whittington was heading out to join up with the hunting party (so wasn't "with" the hunting party). She also said he was hit from a range of about 30 yards. In tall grass and brush that's quite a ways to be seen and heard.

We don't need any statements from people that were there. It is far more fun to just make stuff up.(/sarcasm)

131 posted on 02/13/2006 12:03:29 PM PST by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: geopyg

"Of course as a shooter you need to always be aware of what's around you, so perhaps this is no excuse."


No 'perhaps' about it. There's no excuse for discharging your weapon without first knowing where your hunting party is. As us "conservatives" have preached on this site for years, the gun isn't responsible - the person holding the gun is.

In this case, it's Cheney who is responsible. He should've known where Whittington was at all times.


132 posted on 02/13/2006 12:03:44 PM PST by Blzbba (Sub sole nihil novi est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

"I tell you what, after some of the responses I've seen on this subject, this might be a good time to make an inventory of "freepers I would never go hunting with"."




I think I agree. I've hunted with only a few people. My dad and brother, plus a few friends. Like my father, I'm an absolute stickler for safety on the hunt. Screw up while hunting with me, and I won't hunt with you again...ever.

I'm not the world's best shot, although I do just fine, but I'm very, very good at locating game. When I hunt, I bring back what I'm hunting for. So I'm a fairly popular hunting companion.

Seems like several folks in this thread have been "dusted" or have "dusted" someone. No thanks.

That said, the brouhaha over Cheney's accident is way overdrawn. It was an accident. Nobody died. I hope everyone learned a lesson from it.


133 posted on 02/13/2006 12:04:05 PM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Ben Mugged

That was way to logical.


134 posted on 02/13/2006 12:05:45 PM PST by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

"I'm sorry, but the vast majority of hunting accideents don't just happen."



Amen.

Triggers are NOT SQUEEZED ACCIDENTALLY.


135 posted on 02/13/2006 12:06:54 PM PST by Blzbba (Sub sole nihil novi est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
"It was an accident. Nobody died. I hope everyone learned a lesson from it."

As long as folks hold the person who pulled the trigger blameless, the wrong lesson will be learned from it.

136 posted on 02/13/2006 12:07:41 PM PST by lugsoul ("Try not to be sad." - Laura Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

.....Even if you have a moron in range.....

Hadn't heard that. The shootee was a mormon?


137 posted on 02/13/2006 12:08:47 PM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. Slay Pinch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
VP Cheney went out shooting with some friends the other day

Too many cooks spoil the broth and the hunt...

Too many secret service agents and other strap hangers cluttering up the hunting site...too many people to keep track of and too much distraction for something so potentially dangerous...

138 posted on 02/13/2006 12:11:25 PM PST by joesnuffy (A camel once bit our sister..but we knew just what to do...we gathered rocks and squashed her!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jrabbit
How far out does the birdshot spray and is it smaller than a BB?

8 shot tends to get attenuated by air resistance fairly quickly - the victim was about 30 yards away and it penetrated his skin. The biggest danger at that range would have been if it hit an eye or caught too much in the neck where it could have impacted an artery or vein.

Now, if he had been hit by goose load (2 shot) at that range, he would have been much more seriously injured.

8 shot (doves and quail) is smaller than a BB (8 shot is smaller than 4 shot (duck and pheasants), etc.). But there is a lot of 8 shot even in a 28 gauge shotshell.

139 posted on 02/13/2006 12:12:34 PM PST by dirtboy (I'm fat, I sleep most of the winter and I saw my shadow yesterday. Does that make me a groundhog?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: lugsoul

"As long as folks hold the person who pulled the trigger blameless, the wrong lesson will be learned from it."

Well, yes. The shooter is responsible for his shot...always.

I don't know what the rule is in that area, but turning to take a bird that flies behind you is always forbidden on any hunt I've ever been on. It's just too dangerous. First, your line of fire has to pass over the hunter on one side of you as you turn. Second, you have not been following what is going on behind you, so someone may have approached without your knowledge. Third, you'd miss anyhow, since that's just not a natural shot.

Normally, in a line of, say, three hunters, each hunter has a virtual cone in which he may fire. The angle formed by that cone is a matter of discussion among the members of the party, but, in general it's about 60 degrees. That encompasses a full 180 degrees. The side shooters take birds on their sides and the center shooter takes birds in front. The cones overlap a bit, especially for the center shooter. By sticking to this 60 degree cone of fire, you never run the risk of swinging too far toward another hunter, who may have stepped slightly forward.

It's all safety, along with giving all members of the party a good chance to take game.


140 posted on 02/13/2006 12:14:44 PM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 301-306 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson