Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: durasell

Wasn't Richard III gay or was that another Roman numeral?.........


43 posted on 02/13/2006 9:59:38 AM PST by Red Badger (...Never forget, Jimmy Carter can be elected president AGAIN!........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: Red Badger

Shakespeare's Richard III wasn't gay. The film version that was recently made was really cool, but you have to like Shakespeare with updated set design.


48 posted on 02/13/2006 10:01:26 AM PST by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
Wasn't Richard III gay or was that another Roman numeral?

You may be thinking of Richard I.

105 posted on 02/13/2006 10:43:59 AM PST by steve-b (A desire not to butt into other people's business is eighty percent of all human wisdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Wasn't it Edward II?


130 posted on 02/13/2006 11:46:14 AM PST by 3AngelaD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson