Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jimbergin
"Who says so, your? Why are you the authority that says the two must be separate?"

Because they obviously are separate. They don't agree and the science is verifiable, the Bible is not. The faith is not subject to reason. Why is this so hard to explain?

16 posted on 02/12/2006 6:07:07 AM PST by muir_redwoods (Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopechne is walking around free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: muir_redwoods
Because they obviously are separate. They don't agree and the science is verifiable, the Bible is not. The faith is not subject to reason. Why is this so hard to explain?

Why can't they be separate parts of a whole? Even accepting your definitions, they are both part of man and whatever else is. One can have faith (Faith is "the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things unseen". ) in the unprovable as well as faith (confidence) in the provable. They can be separate but equal, as long as you don't take it to the Warren Supreme Court. :-)

29 posted on 02/12/2006 9:04:44 AM PST by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done, needs to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson