Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen

So you are against charging a kid for possession of sugar? For or against? Which is it?


275 posted on 02/12/2006 1:15:22 PM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]


To: mysterio
"So you are against charging a kid for possession of sugar? For or against? Which is it?"

School policy aside, I'm for charging the kid with the crime committed. He was charged with violating the Illinois Controlled Substances Act, 720 ILCS 570/404(b), unlawful distribution of a look-alike substance, a Class 3 felony.

I doubt, however, that they can make that charge stick. Because of that, I feel they should drop the charge to violating the Illinois Controlled Substances Act, 720 ILCS 570/404(c), unlawful possession of a look-alike substance, a petty offense.

281 posted on 02/12/2006 1:36:23 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson