[robertpaulsen]

"So you are against charging a kid for possession of sugar? For or against? Which is it?"

School policy aside, I'm for charging the kid with the crime committed. He was charged with violating the Illinois Controlled Substances Act, 720 ILCS 570/404(b), unlawful distribution of a look-alike substance, a Class 3 felony.

I doubt, however, that they can make that charge stick. Because of that, I feel they should drop the charge to violating the Illinois Controlled Substances Act, 720 ILCS 570/404(c), unlawful possession of a look-alike substance, a petty offense.

[elkfersupper]

He was charged with violating the Illinois Controlled Substances Act, 720 ILCS 570/404(b), unlawful distribution of a look-alike substance, a Class 3 felony.

So, this law is a pile of BS, but you advocate enforcing it to the full extent anyway?

Very informative..and scary.

[mysterio]

School policy aside, I'm for charging the kid with the crime committed. He was charged with violating the Illinois Controlled Substances Act, 720 ILCS 570/404(b), unlawful distribution of a look-alike substance, a Class 3 felony.

So you're for it. What's the problem? I didn't misrepresent your unthinking fanaticism. You want to throw a kid in jail for having a bag of sugar because it kind of looks like coke. That's insane. You hate drug users so much that you are insane.

You're a one man lollerfest. And Mojave is just the icing on the cake.

[mysterio]

This little bugger is putting fake cocaine on his cheerios! That's a life sentence!!! You brownshirts should join your DEA goon buddies and kick his door in tonight!

Check out the look on his face. Junkie for sure!

[Nova]

The kid didn't "distribute" it. So he's not guilty of that charge.

But the cafeteria workers all need to be put away for life!

[sweet_diane]

"I doubt, however, that they can make that charge stick. "

awww..so sorry RP.