Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boy charged with felony for carrying sugar
suntimes ^ | February 11, 2006

Posted on 02/11/2006 4:11:34 PM PST by Revel

Boy charged with felony for carrying sugar

BY JUSTINA WANG A 12-year-old Aurora boy who said he brought powdered sugar to school for a science project this week has been charged with a felony for possessing a look-alike drug, Aurora police have confirmed.

The sixth-grade student at Waldo Middle School was also suspended for two weeks from school after showing the bag of powdered sugar to his friends.

The boy, who is not being identified because he is a juvenile, said he brought the bag to school to ask his science teacher if he could run an experiment using sugar.

Two other boys asked if the bag contained cocaine after he showed it to them in the bathroom Wednesday morning, the boy's mother said.

He joked that it was cocaine, before telling them, "just kidding," she said.

Aurora police arrested the boy after a custodian at the school reported the boy's comments. The youngster was taken to the police station and detained, before being released to his parents that afternoon.

"This is getting ridiculous," said the boy's mother. "They treated my son like a criminal. .. . This is no way to treat a 12-year-old kid."

East Aurora School District officials declined to comment on the case, citing privacy issues.

The district issued a written statement, which said: "The dangers of illegal drugs and controlled substances are clear.

Could get probation "Look-alike drugs and substances can cause that same level of danger because staff and students are not equipped to differentiate between the two."

The school handbook states that students can be suspended or expelled for carrying a look-alike drug.

Penalties for juveniles are decided on a case-by-case basis, but if convicted, the sixth-grader could likely face up to five years' probation, said Jeffery Jefko, deputy director of Kane County juvenile court services.

Juveniles who have prior criminal records could also be placed in a residential treatment program if convicted, he said.

Aurora Beacon-News


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alibi; anarchy; barneyfife; billofrights; chiefwiggum; constitutionlist; drugsarebadmkay; education; fructose; glucose; govwatch; healthypeople2010; hifructosecornsyrup; keystonecops; libertarians; maltose; nipitinthebud; officerbarbrady; pspl; respectmyauthority; schools; student; students; stupidsneversleep; sugarhigh; suger; sweet; sweettooth; wod; wodlist; zerotolerance
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 661-663 next last
To: 1rudeboy

You're welcome. It's nice to be appreciated.


181 posted on 02/12/2006 7:14:53 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen; Thoeting; Mojave
This falls under the statute of "look-alike" drugs because that is how he presented it to his friends. Had he showed the sugar to his friends and said "this is sugar for a Science experiment" there would have been no punishment.
The title is misleading. He was in trouble not for bringing sugar, but for bringing a product and claiming it was a drug. The "just kidding" comment does not erase the claims he made.
111 Thoeting


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


OMG. A voice of sanity and reason. Be still my heart.
177 paulsen


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



OMG. Another callous voice for drug insanity without reason. Be still my heart.
182 posted on 02/12/2006 7:15:37 AM PST by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
The posters...They remind me of teeanage boys snickering in a corner trying to think of ways to trick the principal of their school.

The kid brought a substance to school and claimed to his friends it was cocaine. The conversation was overheard by a custodian and reported. By law the principal must report this situation as he cannot make a determination of drug/non-drug.

The kid's mouth got him in trouble. Next time, if he brings sugar for an experiment, then he shouldn't claim it is cocaine.

The last time I checked at my neighborhood Safeway, powdered sugar is clearly labeled as powdered sugar without a side label saying "but, maybe it's cocaine? hee hee hee"

183 posted on 02/12/2006 7:19:04 AM PST by Thoeting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

As for inner city schools, some minority families in inner city Baltimore were working second and third jobs for the tuition for such schools like you mention ($3000/yr tuition). These were the families that realized that the public schools in the inner city were little more than day-care centers. I have seen such "day care centers" in Newark NJ.


184 posted on 02/12/2006 7:21:05 AM PST by Fred Hayek (Liberalism is a mental disorder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
Thanks for that.

I guess I fall into that 1/3 of our population that desires neither making or enforcing a bunch of silly rules, nor being governed by them.

You know, sort of like the attitude and position of the people who fought the Revolutionary War in this country.

How idiotic of me.

185 posted on 02/12/2006 7:21:34 AM PST by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: Squantos
5 hours south of here, I can buy all the cold and allergy medication I want without showing anything but currency.

I'm thinking about it.

186 posted on 02/12/2006 7:22:46 AM PST by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
I hear you. Congress should have just prohibited all medicines containing pseudoephedrine and been done with it

If allowed to continue unchecked, I do believe we will be legislated and regulated back into the Middle Ages.

187 posted on 02/12/2006 7:24:49 AM PST by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: Revel

Not only did this kid have something that looked like cocaine in the bathroom, but the sinks in the bathroom dispensed a liquid that looked just like vodka.


188 posted on 02/12/2006 7:25:52 AM PST by Koblenz (Holland: a very tolerant country. Until someone shoots you on a public street in broad daylight...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digitalbrownshirt

As a dad of a couple of former 12 year old boys I could see them acting like idiots with their friends.




I could see me doing something like this. I probably would have too if I would have thought of it.


189 posted on 02/12/2006 7:27:21 AM PST by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper
I do believe we will be legislated and regulated back into the Middle Ages.

For your own good mind you, for your own good. /s

190 posted on 02/12/2006 7:29:39 AM PST by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen

I wonder how many people realize that practically the only reason this sort of a law is on the books in Illinois (and probably most other states as well) is to prevent some con-man from claiming in court, "hey judge, I know the undercover cop busted me for selling him a bag of dope, but it wasn't dope . . . it was oregano."


191 posted on 02/12/2006 7:31:36 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: Thoeting
Next time, if he brings sugar for an experiment, then he shouldn't claim it is cocaine.

Too simple for the drug posters.

192 posted on 02/12/2006 7:44:09 AM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: Revel

these are pathetic times. America has gone insane. It's like the people allegedly fighting the war on some drugs are all on drugs...or should be.


193 posted on 02/12/2006 7:45:36 AM PST by takenoprisoner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper
"I guess I fall into that 1/3 of our population that desires neither making or enforcing a bunch of silly rules, nor being governed by them."

First of all, the time to fight school policy is before your child breaks that policy, not afterwards.

Second, you're saying that you would support a school policy that allows kids to bring look-alike drugs to school? Geez, maybe they could use Monopoly money and do fake "deals" in the hallway between classes. Oh, and have fake drive-bys with fake guns.

You would, of course, allow look-alike guns, right? Hey, what's the harm?

And none of this would detract from a quality education.

194 posted on 02/12/2006 7:52:08 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Thoeting
The kid brought a substance to school and claimed to his friends it was cocaine. The conversation was overheard by a custodian and reported. By law the principal must report this situation as he cannot make a determination of drug/non-drug. ( Thodting)

Thoeting,

I agree with you the principal was boxed in legally and had few rational options.

My question to parents is, Why are you allowing your precious children to attend such a "box" filled with fruitcake laws?
195 posted on 02/12/2006 7:53:27 AM PST by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: Revel
A "look-alike drug"?

Shouldn't that be a "drug look-alike"?

196 posted on 02/12/2006 7:54:41 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (Crime cannot be tolerated. Criminals thrive on the indulgences of society's understanding.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper
"I do believe we will be legislated and regulated back into the Middle Ages."

Only with our permission. We have an opportunity every two years to elect a whole new group to write our laws.

197 posted on 02/12/2006 7:55:00 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
Second, you're saying that you would support a school policy that allows kids to bring look-alike drugs to school? ( Roberpaulsen)

Robertpaulsen,

Saying that I do not approve of "look-alike" drugs at does NOT mean that I approve of hauling a kid off to the police station if he does it.

I phone call to the parent, and a stern chat with the principal should be enough in most rational situations.

Government schools are child abuse. That is what has happened to this boy. Emotional Child abuse!

Geeze! An people wonder why boys are foundering in government schools and not making it in college?

To parents who are still sending children to government school:

WHY on earth are you doing this?????
198 posted on 02/12/2006 7:57:56 AM PST by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: Revel

My nephew had to go to court and pay fines for bringing that shreeded beef jerky that looks like a can of tobacco to school last year.


199 posted on 02/12/2006 8:00:26 AM PST by Siouxz ( Freepers are the best!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wintertime
Once the child has a substance he has claimed is an illegal drug, how is the principal supposed to verify that it is indeed powdered sugar? I for one am NOT sticking my nose into a substance and making a guess, nor am I "tasting" it to guess what it is. I've never used cocaine and do not have any idea what it looks like.

Sorry, not my job to endanger my life.

200 posted on 02/12/2006 8:00:55 AM PST by Thoeting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 661-663 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson