Skip to comments.
Carter allowed surveillance in 1977
Washington Times ^
| Feb. 11, 2006
| Charles Hurt
Posted on 02/11/2006 6:36:57 AM PST by conservativecorner
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
He never met a dictator he didn't love.
To: conservativecorner
Ha ha!
Carter is such a FOOL!!!
He still can't steer a straight line. You'd understand if he were a drunk...but he's not a drunk.
He's just a FOOL!!!
2
posted on
02/11/2006 6:40:26 AM PST
by
ThirstyMan
(hysteria: the elixir of the Left that trumps all reason)
To: conservativecorner
Absolutely delicious. What a fool - a dangerous fool.
To: conservativecorner
Carter fails to mention that he was active in the democrat party in the when it was the party of the KKK.
4
posted on
02/11/2006 6:42:44 AM PST
by
tkathy
(Ban the headscarf (http://bloodlesslinchpinsofislamicterrorism.blogspot.com))
To: conservativecorner
Look at the similarities....
Carter's shirt and Castro's.
All Carter needs is a belt.
5
posted on
02/11/2006 6:42:47 AM PST
by
jdm
(You can learn a lot about paranoids just by following them around.)
To: conservativecorner
"The Truong case, however, involved surveillance that began in 1977, before the enactment of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which established a secret court for granting foreign intelligence warrants.
Democrats and some Republicans in Congress say FISA guidelines, approved in 1978 when Mr. Carter was president, are the only way the president may conduct surveillance on U.S. soil.
Administration officials say the president has constitutional authority to conduct surveillance without warrants in the name of national security. The only way Congress could legitimately curtail that authority, they argue, is through an amendment to the Constitution. "
Exactly, that "things are different because of FISA" is a load of crap. The Congress can not pass a law that overrules the Constitution. If there is a conflict the Constitution wins every time.
6
posted on
02/11/2006 6:44:28 AM PST
by
frankjr
Comment #7 Removed by Moderator
To: jdm
I never realized Castro was so tall
8
posted on
02/11/2006 6:46:22 AM PST
by
petercooper
(Win the war. Confirm the judges. Cut the taxes. Control the spending. Seal the borders.)
To: petercooper
I never realized Castro was so tallOh, that's just the viagra doing it's thing.
9
posted on
02/11/2006 6:49:10 AM PST
by
DCPatriot
("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon)
To: conservativecorner
That is because he is a communist sympathizer.
10
posted on
02/11/2006 6:49:17 AM PST
by
Piquaboy
(22 year veteran of the Army, Air Force and Navy, Pray for all our military .)
To: conservativecorner
"And no one knows how many innocent Americans have had their privacy violated under this secret act," he said."
My guess is that he's most worried about intercepted terrorists are saying about their relationship with him and his colleagues.
11
posted on
02/11/2006 6:52:51 AM PST
by
elfman2
To: petercooper
"I never realized Castro was so tall"Maybe it's just that Mr. Peanut is as small and petty as he acts.........
12
posted on
02/11/2006 6:55:38 AM PST
by
Reo
To: conservativecorner
The kindest thing we can say about Carter is that he was a mistake.
Every
American seems to know it except him.
Watching him dig a deeper hole into oblivion can be a good spectator sport.
To: ThirstyMan
14
posted on
02/11/2006 7:00:33 AM PST
by
Dewy
(1 Timothy 2:5 For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus;)
To: ThirstyMan
Carter's disgusting lack of patriotism is reinforced by a media with an agenda. BUSH BASHING at any cost.
15
posted on
02/11/2006 7:01:24 AM PST
by
OldFriend
(The Dems enABLEd DANGER and 3,000 Americans died.)
To: conservativecorner
This is exactly the route that the Bush Administration should take. Forget the argument about the Patriot Act giving the President this authority. The authority lies in Article II.
US v. Truong set the precedent for this. Since then, three other Circuit Courts have reached the same conclusion (including the 9th). Even the FIS Court of Review has said that FISA cannot encroach upon the "inherent authority" of the President.
US v. Truong
16
posted on
02/11/2006 7:08:22 AM PST
by
Hoodat
( Silly Dems, AYBABTU.)
To: OldFriend; Dewy
Carter's disgusting lack of patriotism ... For sure!
We can now identify his problem as a medical condition: accusing republicans without memory of their own past sins. Let's call it "carter's amnesia".
Looks like Harry Reid is coming down with a BIG case of it too....$68,000 in contributions from Jack Abramoff to Reid's coffers. NICE WORK HARRY!! So much for the "republican" scandal.
Ha-ha-ha, ho-ho-ho!
17
posted on
02/11/2006 7:13:05 AM PST
by
ThirstyMan
(hysteria: the elixir of the Left that trumps all reason)
To: frankjr
"The Congress can not pass a law that overrules the Constitution."
That's a load of hogwash .. the congress has done it time and time again. Roe v. Wade, CFR, affirmative action, etc.
18
posted on
02/11/2006 7:28:30 AM PST
by
CyberAnt
To: conservativecorner
Looks like the Dems will have to find a new spokesman. BWAHAHAHAHA!
To: conservativecorner
HA ha...
and the RATS take another one in the...
20
posted on
02/11/2006 7:40:24 AM PST
by
Chode
(American Hedonist ©®)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson