Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

He never met a dictator he didn't love.
1 posted on 02/11/2006 6:36:58 AM PST by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: conservativecorner
Ha ha!

Carter is such a FOOL!!!

He still can't steer a straight line. You'd understand if he were a drunk...but he's not a drunk.

He's just a FOOL!!!

2 posted on 02/11/2006 6:40:26 AM PST by ThirstyMan (hysteria: the elixir of the Left that trumps all reason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservativecorner

Absolutely delicious. What a fool - a dangerous fool.


3 posted on 02/11/2006 6:41:40 AM PST by StatenIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservativecorner

Carter fails to mention that he was active in the democrat party in the when it was the party of the KKK.


4 posted on 02/11/2006 6:42:44 AM PST by tkathy (Ban the headscarf (http://bloodlesslinchpinsofislamicterrorism.blogspot.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservativecorner
Look at the similarities....

Carter's shirt and Castro's.

All Carter needs is a belt.


5 posted on 02/11/2006 6:42:47 AM PST by jdm (You can learn a lot about paranoids just by following them around.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservativecorner

"The Truong case, however, involved surveillance that began in 1977, before the enactment of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which established a secret court for granting foreign intelligence warrants.
Democrats and some Republicans in Congress say FISA guidelines, approved in 1978 when Mr. Carter was president, are the only way the president may conduct surveillance on U.S. soil.
Administration officials say the president has constitutional authority to conduct surveillance without warrants in the name of national security. The only way Congress could legitimately curtail that authority, they argue, is through an amendment to the Constitution. "

Exactly, that "things are different because of FISA" is a load of crap. The Congress can not pass a law that overrules the Constitution. If there is a conflict the Constitution wins every time.


6 posted on 02/11/2006 6:44:28 AM PST by frankjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservativecorner
That is because he is a communist sympathizer.
10 posted on 02/11/2006 6:49:17 AM PST by Piquaboy (22 year veteran of the Army, Air Force and Navy, Pray for all our military .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservativecorner
"And no one knows how many innocent Americans have had their privacy violated under this secret act," he said."

My guess is that he's most worried about intercepted terrorists are saying about their relationship with him and his colleagues.
11 posted on 02/11/2006 6:52:51 AM PST by elfman2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservativecorner
The kindest thing we can say about Carter is that he was a mistake.
Every American seems to know it except him.

Watching him dig a deeper hole into oblivion can be a good spectator sport.

13 posted on 02/11/2006 6:57:21 AM PST by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservativecorner
This is exactly the route that the Bush Administration should take. Forget the argument about the Patriot Act giving the President this authority. The authority lies in Article II.

US v. Truong set the precedent for this. Since then, three other Circuit Courts have reached the same conclusion (including the 9th). Even the FIS Court of Review has said that FISA cannot encroach upon the "inherent authority" of the President.

US v. Truong

16 posted on 02/11/2006 7:08:22 AM PST by Hoodat ( Silly Dems, AYBABTU.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservativecorner

Looks like the Dems will have to find a new spokesman. BWAHAHAHAHA!


19 posted on 02/11/2006 7:31:19 AM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservativecorner

HA ha...
and the RATS take another one in the...

20 posted on 02/11/2006 7:40:24 AM PST by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservativecorner
I think Mr. Carter, a Nuclear Engineer, was exposed to too much radiation.

Maybe a tin (lead) foil hat woulda helped?

23 posted on 02/11/2006 7:56:41 AM PST by Flifuss (SCE to Aux.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservativecorner

I'm sure Jimmy Carter will go on Larry King's show and explain all of this.


24 posted on 02/11/2006 8:00:25 AM PST by D-Chivas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

In 1976, after living in the United States for more than a decade, Vietnamese citizen David Truong met Dung Krall, a Vietnamese-American wife of an American Naval Officer who had many contacts among Vietnamese living in Paris. [FN473] Truong persuaded Krall to carry packages for him to the Vietnamese in Paris at the time of the 1977 Paris negotiations between North Vietnam and the United States. [FN474] The packages contained copies of U.S. diplomatic cables and other classified papers dealing with Southeast Asia. [FN475] Truong obtained the materials from Ronald Humphrey, an employee of the United States Information Agency, who *62 surreptitiously copied, removed classification markings, and delivered the stolen materials to Truong. [FN476] Humphrey later stated that his motive was to improve United States/North Vietnam relations so that he could be reunited with a woman imprisoned by the North Vietnamese government. [FN477]

Krall, however, was a CIA and FBI informant. [FN478] After the intelligence agencies first learned from Krall that Truong was transmitting classified documents to Paris, President Carter and Attorney General Bell authorized warrantless physical searches of the packages. [FN479] After presenting the packages Truong had given her to the FBI for inspection, copying and approval, Krall was permitted to carry the documents to Paris. [FN480] During this time the FBI monitored Truong and Humphrey closely, from approximately September, 1976, until January 31, 1978. [FN481]

The package searches led to the secret installation of closed-circuit television equipment in Humphrey's government office, the placement of a wiretap on Truong's telephone, and a microphone bugging device in Truong's apartment. [FN482] Truong's phone was tapped and his apartment was bugged from May 1977 to January 1978. [FN483] The telephone interception continued for 268 days; nearly every conversation was monitored and virtually all were taped. [FN484] The eavesdropping device was operative for approximately 255 days and it ran continuously. [FN485] The FBI never sought or obtained court authorization for the installation and maintenance of the telephone tap or the bug. [FN486]

After their indictment, Truong and Humphrey moved to suppress the evidence obtained by the government without a warrant. [FN487] Following the rationale of the decisions in Brown [FN488] and Butenko, [FN489] the District Court determined that because the surveillance was "for the *63 primary, or even sole, purpose of foreign intelligence gathering," [FN490] a foreign intelligence exception to the warrant requirement applied. [FN491] On the basis of this standard, the Court upheld most of the electronic surveillance, but agreed to suppress a portion that had been collected after the investigation shifted its focus from intelligence gathering to criminal prosecution. [FN492]

The Court independently considered the constitutionality of the searches of packages Truong sent to Paris with Krall. [FN493] A letter and package searched with executive authorization but without a warrant before the date at which the surveillance became, in the Court's view, criminal in nature, were treated as governed by the foreign intelligence warrant exception. [FN494]

According to the court, another package, which was searched without executive authorization or a warrant, was not covered by the foreign intelligence exception to the warrant requirement, but was nonetheless constitutional because Truong had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the package. [FN495]

In sustaining the bulk of the surveillance, the Fourth Circuit agreed "that the Executive Branch need not always obtain a warrant for foreign intelligence surveillance" [FN496] where its primary purpose is to gather foreign intelligence: ...

EXECUTIVE AUTHORITY FOR NATIONAL SECURITY SURVEILLANCE, 50 Am. U. L. Rev. 1 (October 2000)


25 posted on 02/11/2006 8:08:34 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservativecorner

Carter is not only a fool, but a liar and traitor too. He needs to be a late president soon, the worthless arse.


29 posted on 02/11/2006 8:33:35 AM PST by right right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: conservativecorner
I think Carter has had one to many TI A's (mini-strokes)....his thought process is just plain goofy..
30 posted on 02/11/2006 8:35:15 AM PST by Kimmers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson