Posted on 02/10/2006 11:50:06 PM PST by goldstategop
Stephen Harper, Canada's new prime minister, unveiled his Cabinet last week and promptly found himself denounced for unprincipled expediency and hypocrisy.
The same Steve Harper, who had said he would appoint only elected senators, chagrinned his supporters by choosing an unelected top-flight Montreal businessman as his first senatorial appointment. This was Michael Fortier, who had helped mastermind Harper into the Tory leadership and helped deliver 10 unexpected Conservative seats from Quebec in the January election. He will be minister of public works.
The same Steve Harper who had deplored the desertion of zillionairess Belinda Stronach last year from his own party to join the Liberal Cabinet, persuaded former Liberal Cabinet minister David Emerson, just re-elected as a Liberal MP in British Columbia, to cross the floor and become Conservative international trade minister.
Harper's explanation was that he couldn't have Montreal and Vancouver, Canada's second and third cities, unrepresented in the Cabinet. Neither had elected a single Tory MP. But it also reflected Harper's determination to make his Cabinet efficient and effective. Both appointees are highly respected in the private sector as men who get things done.
Of far more significance, to my mind, is one man who did not make it into the Cabinet at all. This was Jason Kenney, the Calgary MP who played a key role in putting together the coalition of right-wing parties that made Harper's victory possible, and effectually acted as the party's No. 2 spokesman in the election campaign. So where was Kenney?
Harper's people hastened forth with explanations. A "big job" was being established for Kenney, they said, though it was not in the Cabinet. He was to be made "parliamentary secretary to the prime minister – maybe." And since Harper was appointing no deputy prime minister, Kenney would speak for the whole government when Harper was not in the House. But then a few days later it was announced that other Cabinet ministers would play this role when Harper was away.
So the question remained: Where was Kenney? Kenney, after all, was the foremost "social conservative" in the Harper line-up. He is a Catholic Christian with a record of tireless effort in the pro-life movement. Moreover, he is articulate, reasoned, quick-witted and devastating in debate, all skills he used to great effect in the opposition and in the election campaign.
Two other Albertans had made it into the Cabinet – Calgary's Jim Prentice, as minister of Indian affairs, and Edmonton's Rona Ambrose, as minister of the environment. Both are social liberals. So the question arises: Does the rejection of Jason Kenney signal the rejection of social conservatism in the new government?
To which Harper's defenders would make two replies: For one, they would say, Stockwell Day of British Columbia is no social liberal. He's in the Cabinet. In fact, his blatant social conservatism cost him the election when he led the old Alliance Party. Harper succeeded him as leader, then allied it to the Conservative Party.
But Day is no Jason Kenney. He's what might be called a "Nice-Guy Christian," unlikely to make trouble in Cabinet. Kenney is not a Nice-Guy Christian and, if he saw social conservatism being quietly dumped, could make great trouble. (Jesus Christ, as somebody recently pointed out, wasn't always a Nice Guy, either. That's why they crucified him.)
Not at all, not at all, Harper' defenders would say. Is Harper not allowing a free vote on the bill to repeal gay marriage – "sodomony," as it has been unkindly (though more accurately) called? Certainly, he will, and it might even pass the House. But it will be killed in the Senate, as Harper well knows, so he won't have to apologize for it in pro-gay Toronto and Montreal.
Then what about his plan to pay federal subsidies direct to parents, rather than set up a state-run day-care system? True enough, but he has also signaled Quebec and Ontario that he won't withhold the federal funding for their projected state systems, thereby helping to establish a state system in the two biggest provinces where five-eighths of the Canadian population live.
To the uninformed outsider, all this looks very suspicious. Is the rejection of Kenney the repudiation of what Kenney represents? Will it be paraded before the gays and feminists of the big cities as evidence that Harper has really been their boy all along, and that all these religious wackos in the West really count for nothing in the New Conservative Party? We'll soon know.
(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")
ping
(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")
Well, WTF are they waiting for? Bring back Paul Martin!
This whining about Harper appointing this person or that person is pathetic. All appointments serve at the pleasure of the Prime Minister and he can ask for their resignations at any time should they not live up to his expectations.
Naturally, the Liberal Party's official propaganda service, the CBC (Canadian Bullsh*t Service), hand-in-glove with the rest of Canada's left/liberal media will be looking for anything and everything to bash Harper with, JUST AS WAS PREDICTED the night he was elected.
Where was all this outrage when Belinda Stronach was revealed for the whore she is when Paul Martin paid her price with an appointment and SHE jumped to the Liberals to preserve Martin's sorry ass for a few more months? Or how about that smarmy little snot Scott Brison? He did the same thing long before there was even an election.
Harper is wisely looking at the long term picture, and unless and until he is able to forge a majority government, he is going to be forced to make alliances with those who may not be dyed-in-the-wool conservatives, in order to hopefully advance the goals of the Conservative Party despite their minority status.
The bottom line of this article by Ted Byfield (who is usually 100 percent on the mark) is that apparently Jason Kenney and/or his supporters are upset that he didn't get a nice plum appointment yet, and they're going to bite Harper's ankles on a regular basis until he gives in.
Harper has just waded into the swamp, here come the alligators.
Good luck Stephen.
I'm as right-wing as they come, and I certainly am pleased that Harper is not going to put the sort of folks that Michael Coren and Ted Byfield want to see in Cabinet in cabinet!
Canada Ping!
Please FReepmail me to get on or off this Canada ping list.
I think expediency more than principle. The Conservatives are too attached to their victory to want to risk it for lasting social change.
JMO, you kneejerkers should really go take a Dale Carnegie course.
Self-serving & manipulative
"Sin of Omission" ALERT !!!
Memo to Ted Byfield:
Behold arguably the most socially conservative
Minister of Justice in the nation's history:
Vic Toews
Devious personal agenda pushers like Ted Byfield,
as well as all weak-kneed types, should rightly STFU!
Authentic Conservatives are behind our Leader
Prime Minister Stephen Harper 100% !!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.