Skip to comments.
ON PEGGY NOONAN ON 4 PRESIDENTS AND A FUNERAL
Free Republic, Opinion Journal
| 2.10.06
| Mia T
Posted on 02/10/2006 6:08:58 PM PST by Mia T
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-112 next last
To: Mia T
To: dead
I assume you are not talking about hillary. ;)
42
posted on
02/10/2006 7:41:08 PM PST
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: Revolting cat!
43
posted on
02/10/2006 7:42:24 PM PST
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: dead
If she wasn't so totally hot, she'd have nothing going for her. I'd be willing to call her hotter than hell, if she'd just go there.
44
posted on
02/10/2006 7:42:30 PM PST
by
kylaka
To: Captain Peter Blood
45
posted on
02/10/2006 7:53:07 PM PST
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: Mia T
They are setting up false equivalences with heroic figures. - Mia TYep. Remember when Sir William likened himself to David in the Bible? Great work once again, Mia T. You are a national treasure.
46
posted on
02/10/2006 7:56:35 PM PST
by
Faith
To: AndyJackson
I have never understood a single thing in your verbal diarrhea. I can read and learn from Peggy.....That says a lot more about YOU than MiaT, IMH(and unsolicited)O
47
posted on
02/10/2006 7:59:03 PM PST
by
MamaLucci
(Mutually assured destruction STILL keeps the Clinton administration criminals out of jail.)
To: Mia T
Peggy Noonan is a writer in search of an adjective.
48
posted on
02/10/2006 8:04:52 PM PST
by
Prost1
(Sandy Berger can steal, Clinton can cheat, but Bush can't listen!)
To: Mia T
Thanks for the ping, Mia T...........awesome post....as usual. ;)
49
posted on
02/10/2006 8:06:31 PM PST
by
MamaLucci
(Mutually assured destruction STILL keeps the Clinton administration criminals out of jail.)
To: Faith
50
posted on
02/10/2006 8:06:56 PM PST
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: MamaLucci
51
posted on
02/10/2006 8:07:53 PM PST
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: MamaLucci
love your tagline.
the mutual protection racket writ large is alive and well in dc. The professional pol is the problem.
52
posted on
02/10/2006 8:11:56 PM PST
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: Mia T
The professional pol is the problem....Don't forget the fat and happy (from bread and circuses)American electorate that let them get away with it.
53
posted on
02/10/2006 8:17:08 PM PST
by
MamaLucci
(Mutually assured destruction STILL keeps the Clinton administration criminals out of jail.)
To: MamaLucci
We have to start fielding citizen politicians.
54
posted on
02/10/2006 8:21:06 PM PST
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: Mia T
You're so good! And what a long memory!
55
posted on
02/10/2006 8:28:38 PM PST
by
Incorrigible
(If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
To: Revolting cat!
Too much time serving as an adviser for West Wing, I think.
56
posted on
02/10/2006 8:29:07 PM PST
by
xkaydet65
(Peace, Love, Brotherhood, and Firepower. And the greatest of these is Firepower!)
To: Mia T
Great, Mia T..I seem to ask myself far too often..what on earth has happened to Peggy N.?
57
posted on
02/10/2006 8:32:35 PM PST
by
MEG33
(GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
To: Incorrigible
58
posted on
02/10/2006 8:41:38 PM PST
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: MEG33
thank you. there are interesting theories floating around....;)
59
posted on
02/10/2006 8:44:45 PM PST
by
Mia T
(Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
To: AndyJackson; Mia T
In other words, what are you trying to say? I haven't a clue.
This is the first post by Mia T that I've ever gotten through. I've tried a few times, but as I am modem limited I've never had the time or patience. She seems to have changed her presentation.
I thought her take on Slick's woman-in-the-box-still-has-the-goods remark bang on, and Noonan's, well, lame. Give T a point for that one. But maybe you didn't get that far.
Esquire's view of Slick's hands did nothing to substantiate her claims, any more than Time's (or was it Newsweek) view of Anne Coulters legs and feet would validate negative remarks about Anne's appearance. Cute, maybe, but no points for that one.
I give her a point for her images of the Clintons because I don't mind personal attacks in good fight. Add two points for effort and it still doesn't add up to much. I'll continue to pass.
Speaking of the Clintons, you might enjoy the spy novel "Lucky Bastard" about about a philandering sociopathic president ....... by
Charles McCarry
Nothing personal Mia. ;)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-112 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson