Given how you've misrepresented the article here, I have no faith that you are fairly representing Mark Levin's views. Charitably assuming that you are, it does not matter. I read the article. Jeffress never said he wouldn't defend Libby by saying that Cheney authorized Libby to rebut Wilson's false claims. Jeffress merely stated that he had not communicated such a defense to the court or prosecutor.
That said, I have no idea what defense Jeffress will employ. I'm sure that he's still gathering information in order to develop his most effective defense.
It must comfort liberals to have friends here at freerepublic.
As far as Levin goes, you should listen to his entire program before you speak. He read the entire press release of Libby's lawyer on the air yesterday. He made the same point I made here.
You can choose to defend your false logic by neglecting the fact that Libby's lawyer completely destroyed the false premise made by the MSM. That's what liberals do best.