Posted on 02/10/2006 1:08:57 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
|
|||||
ROFL!!
I really like your idea!!!
"Accepting such self-regulation would send an important political message to the Muslim world, Mr Frattini said."
The irony in all this is that the original publication of the offending cartoons was done to call attention to the issue of self-censorship.
This is so Orwellian on so many levels.
Exactly!
This is SO insane I don't know where to begin. I do want to say one thing however: Where's the vaunted MSM on this? You remember, guys like Cronkite, Brokaw, the network Sixty Minutes types who have been preaching freedom of speech for a long, long time?
My 'O my, they are mighty silent.
Sure will. - As will your wife's eventual adoption of her Burka after your head is cut off, infidel trash.
You're right. And the lefties and muslims will work hand in hand thusly, until they finally achieve full dimmitude in europe.
:THE WAR ON THE FREE PRESS
By Michelle Malkin
· February 09, 2006 10:35 PM
***************************AN EXCERPT****************************************
The Cartoon Jihadists are winning...
Malaysia:
The Malaysian government shut down on Thursday a local newspaper after it published cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed, the official Bernama news agency said. Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, who is also the internal security minister, ordered the indefinite shutdown of The Sarawak Tribune with immediate effect, Bernama said. "Internal Security Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi today ordered Sarawak Tribune's publication permit to be suspended indefinitely with immediate effect for reproducing controversial caricatures of Prophet Mohammed on February 4," it said.
New: Malaysia bans possession of Prophet cartoons
Yemeni paper closed, editor wanted for publishing cartoonsThe Committee to Protect Journalists is deeply concerned by the Yemeni government's decision to revoke the license of the private weekly Al-Hurriya Ahliya and issue an arrest warrant for the paper's editor. The actions came after Al-Hurriya became the third Arab newspaper to publish controversial cartoons depicting the Prophet Muhammad.
The public prosecutor ordered the arrest late Monday of Abdulkarim Sabra, editor-in-chief and publisher of Al-Hurriya, for publishing the cartoons, according to news reports and CPJ sources. Sabra could not be reached for comment, but a human rights lawyer in Yemen told CPJ that Sabra could be charged under Article 103 of the Press and Publication Law.
Article 103 prohibits "printing, publishing, circulating or broadcasting ... anything which prejudices the Islamic faith and its lofty principles or belittles religions or humanitarian creeds." If convicted on that charge, Sabra could be imprisoned for up to one year.
Also Monday, the Ministry of Information ordered the closure of Al-Hurriya after it published four drawings on February 2 as part of its coverage of the protests spawned by the cartoons, the state-run Saba news agency reported. The ministry also removed all issues from newsstands.
South Africa (via VOA):
Court's Outlawing Prophet Cartoons Seen as Threat to S. African Press FreedomThe South African Freedom of Expression Institute says a judgment by the Johannesburg High Court which prevents the publishing of cartoons found offensive by the Muslim community is a major threat to press freedom. The Freedom of Expression Institute argues that while the cartoon should not be published, that decision should be made by newspaper editors not the courts.
The Muslim Judicial Council applied to the High Court for an interdict to prevent two of South Africa's largest media houses publishing the offensive cartoons. The cartoons, which originally appeared in a Danish newspaper, have angered Muslim communities around the globe, sparking riots and protests in many countries. The judge agreed with the Council's argument that the cartoons impinged on the constitutional rights of the Muslim community to dignity.
However the Freedom of Expression Institute says the ruling threatens press freedom in the country. Naeem Jeenah, who heads the Institute's program against censorship, argues that the right of editors to publish is fundamental to a strong democracy.
"We don't believe that editorial decision making should be placed in the hands of the court we think that that sets a very bad precedent that in fact that editors should have that kind of decision making power but to have the court deciding what newspapers can or can't publish before the newspapers even decide whether they are going to publish that we feel is quite problematic," he commented.
...Meanwhile the Independent Media Group, one of the media houses involved in the case, has apologized for an article which appeared in the Cape Argus over the weekend. The article included quotes from Salman Rushdie's book, The Satanic Verses, which was also considered highly offensive by many Muslims when it was released.
Ukraine: Editor-in-chief of popular Ukrainian newspaper "Today" apologizes before Muslims for publishing cartoons, satirizing Prophet Muhammad
Poland: Editor of Polish newspaper apologizes for reprinting cartoons
Canada (via Rants from the Right Coast; hat tip - Steve Janke):
The Cadre, UPEI's student newspaper has published the twelve infamous editorial cartoons that criticized aspects of Islam.At the request of president Wade MacLauchlan, university administrators have removed all 2,000 copies of the paper from campus.
The campus police also showed up at the office of Ray Keating, the paper's editor, and asked that he hand over any copies in his possession, a request he refused to comply with. Read Keating's editorial here.
The UPEI Student Union has withdrawn support of this week's issue of The Cadre and has also stated that Weblogs@UPEI "are no longer accepting comments on the cartoon issue" CTV's Steve Murphy noted during his broadcast tonight that it appears that they are now "censoring discussion about censorship".
Sweden (via Instapundit): "Sweden is reportedly shutting down websites that show the dread Mohammed cartoons."
U.N.'s Kofi Annan criticizes reprinting of controversial cartoons
European Union mulls media code after cartoon protests
The European Union may try to draw up a media code of conduct to avoid a repeat of the furore caused by the publication across Europe of cartoons of the Prophet Mohammad, an EU commissioner said today.In an interview with Britain's Daily Telegraph, EU Justice and Security Commissioner Franco Frattini said the charter would encourage the media to show ''prudence'' when covering religion.
''The press will give the Muslim world the message: We are aware of the consequences of exercising the right of free expression,'' he told the newspaper.
This is not "prudence." This is submission. Repeat after me: I will not submit.
***
Update: At the Jyllands-Posten, Flemming Rose, the culture editor who commissioned the Muhammad cartoons, has been put on indefinite leave.
Jim Hoft has more on the EU's submission.
And Ayaan Hirsi Ali speaks out in defense of newspaper editors and publishers who've run the Muhammad cartoons:
A Dutch politician and self-styled Muslim dissident urged Europeans to stand firm on Thursday in an international crisis over cartoons of the Prophet Mohammad, saying it was "necessary and urgent" to criticise Islam. "Today I am here to defend the right to offend within the bounds of the law," [Hirsi Ali] told a news conference organised by her publisher during a visit to Berlin...She heaped shame on editors and politicians who had argued it was insensitive or irresponsible to reproduce the Mohammad cartoons, including one showing him with a bomb in his turban.
Disgusting...
Dutch MP backs Muhammad cartoons
**********************AN EXCERPT***********************
The Somali-born Dutch MP who describes herself as a "dissident of Islam" has backed the Danish newspaper that first printed the Prophet Muhammad cartoons.
Ayaan Hirsi Ali said it was "correct to publish the cartoons" in Jyllands Posten and "right to republish them".
Her film-maker colleague Theo van Gogh was murdered by a Muslim extremist in a case that shocked the Netherlands.
Ms Hirsi Ali, speaking in Berlin, said that "today the open society is challenged by Islamism".
Mr. Foriegn Minister, you ignorant slut,
Our Founding Fathers figured this out two hundred years ago. Try this:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
Government asking for self-regulation is a threat.
What you are seeing here ladies & gentlemen is the beginning of the end of anything resembling a free press in the European Union. Within 1-2 years Brussels Belgium will have a "Ministry of information " that will "license" journalists/editors & will have the power to censor stories deemed not politically correct.
I was wondering what they are saying over at DU. Anybody Know?
From the Washington Times:
Cartoon rage
By Diana West
February 10, 2006
*************************AN EXCERPT **************************
We need to learn a new word: dhimmitude. I've written about dhimmitude periodically, lo, these many years since September 11, but it takes time to sink in. Dhimmitude is the coinage of a brilliant historian, Bat Ye'or, whose pioneering studies of the dhimmi, populations of Jews and Christians vanquished by Islamic jihad, have led her to conclude that a common culture has existed through the centuries among the varied dhimmi populations. From Egypt and Palestine to Iraq and Syria, from Morocco and Algeria to Spain, Sicily and Greece, from Armenia and the Balkans to the Caucasus: Wherever Islam conquered, surrendering dhimmi, known to Muslims as "people of the book [the Bible]," were tolerated, allowed to practice their religion, but at a dehumanizing cost.
There were literal taxes (jizya) to be paid; these bought the dhimmi the right to remain non-Muslim, the price not of religious freedom, but of religious identity. .....
*********************************
See link for the rest of the editorial.....Hattip to Michelle Malkin...
go get stuffed EU
Dane Sees Greed and Politics in the Crisis ~ Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen said Thursday...
See link at #37,
Or better yet...how many years have they gone along without a violent conflict of the two? Hmmm....
Now along comes Islam....and they have a problem with the two basic freedoms?
Whose problem is it, really?
There is no conflict. Freedom of speech lets one not only exercise the freedom to believe what one wants but to try to convince others of the validity and importance of those beliefs. Some religions, including some parts of Christianity, require that sort of thing. For those people, prosthylizing is part of practicing their religion.
Freedom of religion means, to quote the first amendment, that there can be no law "no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof". This means the Government cannot tell what to believe, no prevent you from practicing what you believe. (Unless of course you believe in "Death to the Infidels").
The freedom to believe, and to practice your religion is not the freedom to have no one question or ridicule your beliefs, other than the government that is. It is not the freedom to force others to believe as you do, OR ELSE.
Fascists, Italian, Islamo or other, have big problems with Freedom.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
