To: TheBrotherhood
It's the best I can retrieve from my accumulated knowledge without further inquiry.
So your problem is that you steadfastly refuse to learn anything. Thanks for the admission.
226 posted on
02/10/2006 9:18:02 PM PST by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Dimensio
Do you think the first definition was better? I think it was. The second one, upon re-rading it, don't make no sense to me.
228 posted on
02/10/2006 9:22:21 PM PST by
TheBrotherhood
(Randomness does not create intelligence; only intelligence creates intelligence.)
To: Dimensio
I can always come up with a better formal definition, but I'm no scientist. I wager you that even among scientists they disagree on a definition of law and theory.
230 posted on
02/10/2006 9:25:42 PM PST by
TheBrotherhood
(Randomness does not create intelligence; only intelligence creates intelligence.)
To: Dimensio
It's the best I can retrieve from my accumulated knowledge without further inquiry. So your problem is that you steadfastly refuse to learn anything. Thanks for the admission.
UHhhh...
How do you get this from that?
250 posted on
02/11/2006 4:57:02 AM PST by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson