"Modern cell biology doesn’t support Darwinism."
More supporting evidence why evolution is a fake, phony and fraudulent theory.
Pseudo science.
More supporting evidence why evolution is a fake, phony and fraudulent theory.
Wow, are *you* confused... First, the fringe opinion of a paleontologist speculating far outside his own field (in cell biology) is not "evidence" of any sort. Real evidence is hard facts, not anyone's opinion on anything.
Second, Schwartz is quite simply wrong on this point. Modern cell biology spectacularly confirms evolutionary biology. Don't just take my word for it, pick up any science journal that deals with cell biology or DNA.
Third, Schwartz appears to be trying to drum up sales for his book, and portray himself as a "maverick" in the interests of self-aggrandizement, so any of his press releases should be taken with the same grain of salt you'd use for anyone who clearly has a personal agenda and a motive for self-promotion.
Fourth, I never cease to be amused by anti-evolutionists' transparent and dishonest habit of latching instantly onto anyone's opinion as if it were the Word of God if it happens to reinforce your preconceptions, while at the same time utterly rejecting out of hand the considered conclusions of the great majority of the foremost experts in the field just because you *don't* want to hear what they have to say. You do the same with hard evidence (when you bother to look at it at all) -- you grab onto any isolated fact that you think you can spin into matching your beliefs, but think nothing of dismissing with nothing more than a hand-wave vast mountains of evidence which paint an unmistakable "big picture" view contradicting your cherished notions.
You guys aren't really interested in what the evidence actually indicates or what the experts actually have to say, you're just interested in grasping onto anything that helps you reinforce your current beliefs.
So it's laughable when you then try to dismiss real science as:
fake, phony and fraudulent Pseudo science.
No, sorry, that's *your* method, not ours. Ours is to gather as much evidence as possible, perform as many tests as we can conceive of, do as much research as humanly possible, and see where it leads us, while carefully validating all of our tentative conclusions against the real world by checking to see if the evidence and findings -- ALL of them, not just any one isolated fact -- match the predictions of our potential explanations.
Evolution has met the strict challenges of the scientific method for 150 years, and has survived countless validation checks and falsification tests when compared to vast mountains of evidence across multiple cross-confirming lines. It's an extremely solid and well-established field of science, and it never ceases to astound me that there can be endless waves of grossly ignorant people who can manage to maintain completely false fantasies about how evolutionary biology is just some sort of empty shell run by a cabal of nefarious conspirators or such nonsense.
Why don't you get an education and then come back and try again? You guys are as tiresome as the Michael Moore parrots, and for exactly the same reasons.
Again, look in the mirror. If you are an exact clone of all your ancestors and there is not the slightest difference then no change or evolution has occurred. However if there is any change, no matter how small evolution has occurred. Evolution is a fact and a occurring fact and is proved by the observation that no two of the 6.7 billion people that exist on earth are a exact duplicate. The theory of evolution is explanation of a fact (evolution) and not a argument that evolution exists. To deny evolution (change) would deny your own existence. Your evolution occurred by reproduction.