WITH a mind to the founders' caveat about foreign wars and entanglements. 
Posted on 02/10/2006 10:01:03 AM PST by Luis Gonzalez
Three years ago, I wrote that Pat Buchanan was "the useful idiot of the liberal establishment" and that his "wisdom and patriotism must be questioned." After I penned those words, I received a barrage of hate mail from supporters of Buchanan. Much of the mail was anti-Semitic, and most of it was ignorant babble.
Of course, it is no surprise that Buchanan's supporters compose the anti-Semitic and ignorant wing of the paleo-conservative right. Buchanan himself is anti-Semitic and ignorant. This week, he proved both his moral blindness and his myopic bigotry in a series of columns supporting American foreign aid for Hamas, castigating American presidents from Wilson and FDR and Truman to Kennedy and Bush for their interventionist foreign policies and insulting freedom of the press in Europe.
First, on Feb. 1, Buchanan stated:
Understandably, the Israelis are close to hysterical over the landslide for Hamas and are on a diplomatic campaign to have all donors end all aid to a Palestinian Authority dominated by Hamas. But that is not in our interests. It is not even in Israel's interest. For it has been Israel's behavior, and uncritical U.S. support for that behavior, that produced this victory for Hamas. To continue on that road is to arrive at, literally, a dead end.
Buchanan's arrogance is astounding. The idea that monetary support for the terrorist group Hamas is in America's and Israel's best interest is laughable. The very idea that a man who has called Congress "Israeli-occupied territory" can speak for Israel's "best interest" is laughable. Buchanan, the anti-Semite, strikes again.
At least Buchanan is consistent. He believes that capitulation to Arab terror is the best solution across the board. On Feb. 3, he condemned President Bush's State of the Union address, averring, "His victory in Iraq, like the wars of Wilson and FDR, has turned to ashes in our mouths ... Bush seeks to counter critics who warned him not to go in by associating them with the demonized and supposedly discredited patriots of the America First movement of 1940-1941 ... Who has done more to empower Islamic radicals than Bush with his clamor for elections across a region radicalized by our own policies?"
Yes, you read that correctly: Buchanan feels that World War II was a defeat for America and identifies himself with the fully discredited America First movement. Of course, this is nothing new from Buchanan – he has already declared that World War II was not worth fighting. At least Buchanan's revolting and shameful betrayal of the hundreds of thousands who died for freedom in World War II and the millions who died in death camps makes clear one thing: The same folks who despise America's interventionism on behalf of freedom in the Middle East would have let Britain fall to Hitler and the chimneys of Auschwitz spew forth the ashes of every last Jew.
But Buchanan wasn't done yet. On Feb. 6, he blamed European freedom of the press for Muslim rampaging across the globe. European newspapers, he explained, had provoked Muslim rage by reprinting a controversial Danish cartoon depicting the Muslim prophet Mohammed with his turban shaped like a bomb. "What was the purpose of this juvenile idiocy by the Europress?" Buchanan asked. "Is this what freedom of the press is all about – the freedom to insult the faith of a billion people and start a religious war?" Of course, no Buchanan column would be complete without a reference to Jews, so Buchanan added this gem: "What hypocrisy ... Skeptics and deniers of the Holocaust are prosecuted, fined and imprisoned in Europe with the enthusiastic endorsement of the European press."
Apparently, Buchanan is upset that Europeans would deign to be more sensitive about a Holocaust they perpetrated than a cartoon labeling Islam as violent. Buchanan is upset that European governments have not followed the lead of the spineless State Department, deploring the cartoon while upholding the rights of the press. Note to Pat: Radical Muslims aren't really upset about the cartoon. The cartoon is a stand-in for Western freedoms as a whole. Islamists are just as offended by the very existence of an elderly white Jesuit who tends to support their hatred of Jews.
Unfortunately, Pat Buchanan represents many people on both sides of the political aisle. He is the representative of a constituency that seeks American isolationism and appeasement. He is the representative of a constituency that always blames America – unless Israel is available as a first-option scapegoat. He is more left than right, and more nuts than sane. He is important for one reason, and one reason only: He reveals the mindset of America's fifth columnists.
Other than his support of a Marxist feminist?
That would be like claiming that a man who was caught with another man's penis inserted in his rectum is not gay because he never said that he was gay.
My point is that Sharpton is a racist, and Pat is an anti-semite.
You seem to have a problem dealing with that.
ATTABOY Louis!
Or not.
Maybe Shapiro did! Taking self-loathing multiple personalities to a new level...
Or worse, its labelled "retreat" or "anti" this or that.
The question that always has to be asked of those who attempt to blacken and smear others reputation for the temerity to disagree in good conscience and for expressly publicly virtuous reasons....is:
"What are you selling?"
Not all conservatives go in lockstep. Witness Milton Friedman openly stating that going into Iraq was a mistake. I don't think that he should be drummed out of the Movement because he disagrees with us on that. But Shapiro is clearly not interested in a Big Tent that includes people on his right. Or actual open discussion, wherein we have to prove the viability of our positions, but instead vilify those who take strongly questioning stances that forces us to reprove the continuing basis for our assumptions.
Personally, I just ignore him, just as I do the Rockford Institutute. They have no relevance to the situation at hand.
How, exactly, did he "support" Fulani? What position did she get as a result of his "support?"
And your crude example, beside revealing a bitter, filthy, and shallow mind, shows that you have no concrete example of Buchanan's supporting either Marxism or feminism.
>>>>>>Personally, I just ignore him, just as I do the Rockford Institutute. They have no relevance to the situation at hand.
Why do people feel the need to attack someone who is irrelevant? Normal people don't waste their time attacking someone who is irrelevant.
I don't know...
Attacking one of Farah's boys might not lend itself to long term employment at WORLDNUTDAILY.....
Although it's interesting to see how many of the Buchanan supporters come out here.
This is a display of neo-cons gone wild.
A frightening thought. Imagine the video!
Campaign co-chair. Luis apparently didn't know that, but you know that perfectly well.
I'm not. America Firsters are members of a specific, organized political movement opposed to our participation in WWII. It has nothing at all to do with loyalty. Pat has suggested reviving the movement. Of course the original America First Committee disbanded a few days after Pearl Harbor. Lauding themselves for keeping us out of the war that long, but I presume wanting to support our troops in the field. It's not clear to me that today's America Firsters are of the same mind. Some, like Pat, would adhere to enemies such as Hamas,
How exactly did Fulani benefit from this? How much was she paid? "Campaign co-chairmen" (if she was such a thing) are a dime a dozen.
And as you know perfectly well, Fulani walked out of the Reform Party convention and denounced Buchanan, once Buchanan had the nomination locked up and it was apparent Fulani wasn't getting anything out of the campaign.
And neither you, nor Luis, nor any of the other Buchanan-hating obsessives have (or can) come up with a single example of Buchanan endorsing Marxism or feminism. Fulani's influence on Buchanan was nill, despite the enormous role she plays in the imaginations of the Buchanan-haters.
Where are American troops fighting Hamas? How many Americans has Hamas killed?
Yep, I take the college kid over Pat any day too. I think Ben is fantastic.
WITH a mind to the founders' caveat about foreign wars and entanglements.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.