1) I dont care about at risk. Thats vague. And it is a classic trick that is used to inflate numbers.
2) Number of victimized children is hard to know. BINGO!
3) 40,000 will have some brush with sexual trafficking. Again, too vague to be useful. Im reminded of the astronomical numbers of college girls who are raped each year. Rape being defined so broadly that a girl who is kissed by a boy she doesnt like has been raped.
4) Again, the number is hard to know. BINGO!
At most AT MOST! this citation allows one to speculate about 40,000 victims. Yet you read this and conclude that the concerns about 100,00 victims may be reasonable.
IMO, its all crap and free-mongering. No offense meant to you.
No offense taken. I'm just saying that one number presented (from 2002) suggests 40,000. Earlier on in the report they make an estimate at 300,000-800,000. I'm just suggesting that because of the "invisiblity" due to the internet and cell phones, etc, the number could be reasonably estimated at 100,000 in today's terms. It's an estimation in any case.
Believe me, I understand that you can make numbers/statistics say anything you want them to. Whatever the real numbers are on the situation, I think this must be prevalent *enough* to be a concern to parents and children. We live in a sick society. This is just another reminder of the weirdos and perverts out there, at least to me. It is a reminder to go over safety *rules* with my kids. Nothing more. I take it like it's a public service announcement. I'm not panicking, just trying to be aware and prepare the best I can.