Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sen. Reid's Staff Routinely Met With Abramoff Team
KLAS TV ^ | Feb 9, 2007

Posted on 02/10/2006 6:05:51 AM PST by KeyLargo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
"Reid, D-Nev., has led the Democratic Party's attacks portraying Abramoff's lobbying and fundraising as a Republican scandal."
1 posted on 02/10/2006 6:05:53 AM PST by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Ol' Dingy Harry's been kinda quiet lately. [giggle]


2 posted on 02/10/2006 6:08:55 AM PST by Coop (FR = a lotta talk, but little action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo
Reid said this was a Republican only scandal, his staff met with Jack Abramoff, therefor his staff must all be Republicans.

So all these Democrats taking money from Idians Casinos must have all Republican staffs. No wonder they are so screwed up!

3 posted on 02/10/2006 6:11:17 AM PST by pikachu (I must be be built upside down -- my nose runs and my feet smell!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Uh-oh. Now Reid will be grilled by the Cape Cod Orca (thanks holdonnow) about his contacts with "Abraham-off" or maybe not. Maybe ol' Fat Ted doesn't have the stones to take on "the Body."


4 posted on 02/10/2006 6:12:00 AM PST by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo
"Don't look at me; it's a Republican scandal, I tell you. ....get it? Republican, Republican! Why is everyone looking a me?!" - HR
5 posted on 02/10/2006 6:14:25 AM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Paging John Dean!


6 posted on 02/10/2006 6:17:13 AM PST by JIM O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

So its only bribery if you changed your mind because of it? (And you are a Republican of course)


7 posted on 02/10/2006 6:18:03 AM PST by Democratshavenobrains
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Well, now that the esteemed senator has got caught with his hands in the cookie jar, I don't suppose we'll hear a whole lot more about the Republican scandal.
Of course no one will hold him to account for all his blatant lies.


8 posted on 02/10/2006 6:18:09 AM PST by taillightchaser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Why isn't this on the front page of the NYTimes? Ohhh.


9 posted on 02/10/2006 6:18:27 AM PST by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JIM O
Portion of transcript from Chris Wallace's show Jan 29

WALLACE: So if we find — and I just want to — we have to wrap this up. But if we find that there were some Democrats who wrote letters on behalf of some of the Indian tribes that Abramoff represented, then what do you say, sir?

DEAN: That's a big problem, and those Democrats are in trouble, and they should be in trouble. And our party, if the American people will put us back in power in '06, we will have on the president's desk things that outlaw all those kinds of behaviors. Right now it's a Republican scandal. Maybe they'll find that some Democrats did something wrong, too. That hasn't been the case yet.

But our reforms in the Democratic Party are going to be aimed at both Democrats and Republicans. We want to clean up Congress, and we will within 100 days of the new Congress in 2007.

WALLACE: Chairman Dean, we're going to follow up on that. Thank you. Thanks so much for joining us. And don't be a stranger. You're always welcome here.

DEAN: We'll see you soon. Thanks, Chris.

10 posted on 02/10/2006 6:24:48 AM PST by JIM O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo
Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid wrote at least four letters helpful to Indian tribes represented by Jack Abramoff, and the senator's staff regularly had contact with the disgraced lobbyist's team about legislation affecting other clients.

Pinky is in trouble!

11 posted on 02/10/2006 6:32:46 AM PST by frogjerk (LIBERALISM: The perpetual insulting of common sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

by Matt Margolis :: December 20, 2005 10:44 AM


Harry Reid refuses to hold himself to the same standards he holds for Republicans, or even the standards of his fellow Democrats, who have returned donations they received connected to embattled lobbyist Jack Abramoff. On "Fox News Sunday" with Chris Wallace last weekend, Reid was unable to admit his hypocrisy for being connected to Abramoff, and once again refused to return the donations he's received:

WALLACE: ... One of the biggest scandals in Washington right now involves Jack Abramoff, a lobbyist who's under investigation, and his clients.

It turns out that you received $66,000 in campaign contributions from Abramoff and his clients. Some of your colleagues...

REID: Chris, Chris...

WALLACE: May I ask the question?

REID: Don't try to say I received money from Abramoff.

REID: I've never met the man, don't know anything...

WALLACE: But you've received money from...

REID: Make sure that all your viewers understand — not a penny from Abramoff. I've been on the Indian Affairs Committee my whole time in the Senate.

WALLACE: But you've received money from his firm. You've received money from some of his clients. The question I'm asking if I may get the question out, Senator. Some of your colleagues, both Republican and Democrats, have given back campaign contributions that had any taint of Abramoff to it. Are you going to do so?

REID: Well, first of all, Chris, make sure that — again, I'll repeat, Abramoff gave me no money. His firm gave me no money. He may have worked a firm where people have given me money. But I have — I feel totally at ease that I haven't done anything that is even close to being wrong.

And I'm going to continue doing what I've done for my entire tenure in Congress. My record — any money that I've received — it's a federal law. You can look who gave it to me, how much, when they gave it to me, and what their occupations are.

So don't lump me in with Jack Abramoff. This is a Republican scandal. Don't try to give any of it to me.

http://www.noagenda.org/2005/11/a_web_of_hypocrisy_2.php


12 posted on 02/10/2006 6:36:24 AM PST by Just A Nobody (NEVER AGAIN - Support our troops. I *LOVE* my attitude problem! Beware the Enemedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coop
Ol' Dingy Harry seems to have some baggage....
13 posted on 02/10/2006 6:36:34 AM PST by pointsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pointsal

Harry's home town TV station is tearing him a new one.


14 posted on 02/10/2006 6:44:46 AM PST by Neville72 (uist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Neville72
Poor Harry...

The Searchlight is on...
but no one is home.

15 posted on 02/10/2006 6:52:37 AM PST by gov_bean_ counter (It is easy to call for a pi$$ing contest when you aren't going to be in the line of fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter

Perhaps his wife will take in laundry for a little extra money.


16 posted on 02/10/2006 7:14:40 AM PST by Irish Queen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

BUT IT'S A REPUBLICAN SCANDAL


17 posted on 02/10/2006 7:52:54 AM PST by IrishMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

What is wrong with this guy? Didn't he know that there were records that he was involved with Abramoff? He reminds me of a preacher who preaches against maturbation to teens while he's having an affair with the church organist.


18 posted on 02/10/2006 7:55:37 AM PST by no dems ("99% of lawyers give the rest a bad name." Steven Wright)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

19 posted on 02/10/2006 8:12:01 AM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham (A Liberal: One who demands half of your pie because he didn't bake one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no dems

You guys all seem to think that Harry is bright and intelligent. Based on interviews...I'd say he was the least capable senator of the whole bunch of making rational and independent thinking. His chief of staff is earning every dime of his paycheck...keeping Harry up to date and giving verbage to feed the media. That guy should be the guy representing Neveda...not Harry. I doubt if Harry is capable of understanding what Abramoff wanted in the first place when they met. The chief of staff probably arranged everything and ensured that the check went to the right off-shore account...and that no notes were kept of the whole meeting. Lets remember this...Kennedy is the king of accepting off-shore money and hiding it...he even arranges tax code to be written so he can shift the money into the states later and avoid taxation.


20 posted on 02/10/2006 9:17:28 AM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson