Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/10/2006 4:22:00 AM PST by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: yoe

Great article. No thanks again to the powers that be that came here to PA and campaigned relentlessly for specter.


2 posted on 02/10/2006 4:30:06 AM PST by Dr. Scarpetta (There's always a reason to choose life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe
You mean we should not eaves droop on terrorist cell to cell communications right here in the U.S.?
3 posted on 02/10/2006 4:38:17 AM PST by madconserv (Proud to be FReepin--Support Our Troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

We all know about Senator Spectre. POS.


4 posted on 02/10/2006 4:50:27 AM PST by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

Judge Kollar-Kotelly was appointed to the United States District Court in May 1997.


A Clinton appointee. Now everything makes sense.


5 posted on 02/10/2006 5:20:41 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

US District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly rules on a lawsuit filed by three Kuwaiti detainees at Guantanamo: Mohammed Ahmed al-Kandari, Khalid Abdullah Mishal al-Mutairi, and Fawzi Khalid Abdullah Fahad al-Odah. She rules that detainees should be permitted to communicate with their lawyers without the government listening in on their conversations. She says the government's attempt to wire-tap detainee-attorney communications threatens to “erode [the] bedrock principle” of attorney-client privilege. She says the government is defending its position with “a flimsy assemblage” of arguments. “The government has supplied only the most slender legal support for its argument, which cannot withstand the weight of the authority surrounding the importance of the attorney-client privilege.” [Reuters, 10/20/2004] The three Kuwaitis, Judge Kollar states, “have been detained virtually incommunicado for nearly three years without being charged with any crime. To say that their ability to investigate the circumstances surrounding their capture and detention is ‘seriously impaired’ is an understatement.” [Associated Press, 10/21/2004]


6 posted on 02/10/2006 5:29:50 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe
Remember the FISA Judge who "quit" because of the
'terrorist surveilance program'
(Who's name I've forgotten)
was oppointed by Clinton to the FISA court, shortly after clearing Web Hubbel on all charges, only to be overturned on appeal and got nailed with multiple inditements.
7 posted on 02/10/2006 5:31:09 AM PST by IrishMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

This is one more outrageous example of the short sighted thinking of our elected representatives and senators.

It was bad enough that judges throw out evidence in a trial, but when they throw out everything that could find terrorists because the rules weren't followed, we need to revolt and throw out anyone who holds such stupid ideas.


10 posted on 02/10/2006 6:49:06 AM PST by oldtimer2 (Liberal: a power worshipper without power....George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson