To: Coleus
Heterosexuals discussing what it means to be homosexual is akin to white folks discussing what it means to be black.
If you haven't been there - how on earth would you know?
191 posted on
02/10/2006 11:29:05 AM PST by
Tokra
(I think I'll retire to Bedlam.)
To: Tokra
If you haven't been there - how on earth would you know?
Oh, I see. So if you haven't been sodomized, you can have no opinion on sodomy. If you haven't tried crack, you can have no opinion on getting high. If you haven't driven while intoxicated, you can't have an opinion on drunk driving. If you haven't chopped someone's head off, you can have no opinion about Islamofascists. If you haven't ...
198 posted on
02/10/2006 12:23:05 PM PST by
Antoninus
(The only reason you're alive today is because your parents were pro-life.)
To: Tokra
Heterosexuals discussing what it means to be homosexual is akin to white folks discussing what it means to be black. If you haven't been there - how on earth would you know? You dont have to dig through the dumpster to know whats in it. This is an argument that is used to death and is completely irrelevant and quite weak. Just because one lacks firsthand experience doesnt rule him out as a legitimate contributor to the discussion.
Every day of the year people discuss openly about how some team should do something better in pro sports, most have never played that pro sport yet I assume you dont engage in that sort of hypocrisy right?
So I guess Abraham Lincoln had no business with that pesky emancipation proclamation, right? After all, he wasnt black so how could he be in tune with the black communities desires?
206 posted on
02/10/2006 1:35:32 PM PST by
thehumanlynx
(“All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.” -Edmund Burke)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson