1 posted on
02/09/2006 3:33:19 PM PST by
Calpernia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: Calpernia
What exactly is DTV? I know what WiMax is, but what's DTV?
2 posted on
02/09/2006 3:36:32 PM PST by
benjibrowder
("America is always more secure when Freedom is on the march"-George Bush, Jan.31, 2006)
To: Calpernia
harumph.... should have forced digital radio first.
To: LibreOuMort
4 posted on
02/09/2006 3:37:54 PM PST by
sionnsar
(†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† | Libs: Celebrate MY diversity! | Iran Azadi 2006 | Is it March yet?)
To: Calpernia
5 posted on
02/09/2006 3:38:37 PM PST by
VOA
To: Calpernia
6 posted on
02/09/2006 3:39:03 PM PST by
Revolting cat!
("In the end, nothing explains anything.")
To: Calpernia
So...will my regular old TV still work in 2009 or not?
7 posted on
02/09/2006 3:41:23 PM PST by
Gator101
To: Calpernia
We'll then have 500 channels and nothing on. Progress!
8 posted on
02/09/2006 3:41:26 PM PST by
Revolting cat!
("In the end, nothing explains anything.")
To: Calpernia
The final bill includes up to $1.5 billion in funding to provide two $40 vouchers per household to use toward the purchase of digital-to-analog set-top converter boxes.Un-Freepin' Believable!
To: Calpernia
Just in time for the NEW administration to catch the blame when millions of grannies and people on fixed incomes watch their screens go blank and are told they must pay thousands to watch tv again. Brilliant!
13 posted on
02/09/2006 3:43:10 PM PST by
Tall_Texan
(Hey Libs! - Remember how conservatives looked during Clinton? Guess what you haters look like now?)
To: Calpernia
Legislation requiring U.S. broadcasters to abandon their analog spectrum, opening up the "beachfront" spectrum to next-generation wireless services and emergency response agencies, is headed to U.S. President George Bush to be signed into law. WOW!
I'm so glad that Congress has solved all out country's problems so they can focus on our TV reception!
Would someone point out the part in the Constitution that allows congress to tell broadcasters HOW they must send out their signals?
16 posted on
02/09/2006 3:44:09 PM PST by
MamaTexan
(It's supposed to be *fly-over* country....not SCREW-OVER country!)
To: Calpernia
The sane response to the utterly unoriginal knee-jerk reaction to the spending bill is this: gummint requires, gummint pays, end of discussion!
18 posted on
02/09/2006 3:44:11 PM PST by
Revolting cat!
("In the end, nothing explains anything.")
To: Calpernia
Part of the spectrum will also go to help public safety agencies better communicate with each other.Cool, I can crank my home AM and FM transmitters to 100 watts and not P.O. my neighbors.......life is good......I Heard It on the X.......
23 posted on
02/09/2006 3:45:32 PM PST by
Decepticon
(The sheep pretend the wolf will never come, but the sheepdog lives for that day (NRA)
To: Calpernia
The final bill includes up to $1.5 billion in funding to provide two $40 vouchers per household to use toward the purchase of digital-to-analog set-top converter boxes.It would be interesting to see who manufactures these set top boxes that the vouchers qualifies for. A must be "Made in the USA" provision would be nice.
To: Calpernia
Kewl!
![](http://blog.cleverly.com/misc/old-tv.jpg)
To: Calpernia
Late Wednesday, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a large budget reconciliation bill that included a deadline of February 17, 2009, for broadcasters to stop broadcasting analog signals and move to digital television (DTV). Which either means they continue using the existing UHF/VHF bandwidth, just changing what and how they transmit over it...
Or all of your local (free) network channels will be going off the air February 17, to broadcast exclusively via some form of satellite or land-line (copper/fiber).
34 posted on
02/09/2006 3:57:33 PM PST by
Alex Murphy
(Colossians 4:5)
To: Calpernia
So retailers can add $40 to the price of the converter boxes, huh?
35 posted on
02/09/2006 3:58:27 PM PST by
savedbygrace
(SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
To: Calpernia
All this means is that now companies will be able to stick it to everybody.
74 posted on
02/09/2006 4:35:04 PM PST by
XR7
To: Calpernia
2009? That's a long time away. Most of us will be singing duets with John Lennon by then:
if I ain't dead already,
ooh, girl you know the reason why
80 posted on
02/09/2006 4:38:11 PM PST by
Revolting cat!
("In the end, nothing explains anything.")
To: Calpernia
I'm personally thrilled, but I can hear the Democrats now when the date starts bearing down: "This discriminates! We have to help the less fortunate buy digital TVs!"
MM
81 posted on
02/09/2006 4:38:11 PM PST by
MississippiMan
(Behold now behemoth...he moves his tail like a cedar. Job 40:17)
To: Calpernia
I want my HDTV (broadcasts)!!
I can hardly wait of more HD content. I've had mine for a couple of months now and love it.
I get my signal from Time-Warner Cable, though I could get our five local stations over the air for CBS, NBC, ABC, FOX and PBS.
One of the odd things that happens is that on cable the stations get a chunk of bandwidth and will split it up into a couple of standard def versions with different content., often to the detriment of the high def signal. For example WRAL here has an all weather and all news feed, but there HD signal has such crummy compression you lose a lot. My understanding is that over the air is the same way.
On the other hand, some of the cable fed HD, like DiscoverHD, PBS, ESPNHD and others are literally stunning.
If you want a crash course in HDTV, home theater, hardware, etc you need to visit the FR of HighDef, the avsforum.com.
93 posted on
02/09/2006 5:12:32 PM PST by
TC Rider
(The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson