Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tancredo Throws Punches at Bush
Human Events ^ | February 9 2006 | Robert B. Bluey

Posted on 02/09/2006 12:18:44 PM PST by Reagan Man

Rep. Tom Tancredo (R.-Colo.) didn’t hold back in his criticism of President Bush this morning at the Conservative Political Action Conference—delivering what amounted to a presidential stump speech that could have easily been delivered in New Hampshire or Iowa.

Tancredo attacked the administration for its support of a guest-worker program for illegal aliens and its big-spending ways on education and Medicare prescription drugs.

“It is the President who is out of step with his party, not Tom Tancredo,” the Colorado Republican said to applause at the Omni Shoreham Hotel in Northwest Washington, D.C.

Tancredo called for the repeal of two programs offered by President Bush: the No Child Left Behind Act and the Medicare prescription drug program. Both expanded the cost of government and drew the scorn of conservatives in Congress.

Tancredo said the Big Government policies of the Bush administration need to be halted. He said conservatives must return the GOP to a “party of individual rights and shouldn’t afraid to say it.”


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; bush; cpac; tancredo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 561-564 next last
To: Travis McGee
Talk about Quislings...

41 posted on 02/09/2006 1:31:11 PM PST by PRND21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Hayzo
"I don't disagree with Tancredo, I am just a realist looking at the country's current politcal climate."

I gotcha ya ... but like you said it WILL take a big event and that event WILL happen in the near future (2, 3, 5 years). At that point it will galvanize the majority of public opinion, but as usual for America it will be too little too late.
42 posted on 02/09/2006 1:31:47 PM PST by MaDeuce (Do it to them, before they do it to you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
Since when does any politician content himself with communicating through press releases alone?

I mean, I know you guys feel threatened every time he opens his mouth, I can understand that. But try not to give yourselves away so blatantly by making totally nonsensical observations.

43 posted on 02/09/2006 1:32:43 PM PST by inquest (If you favor any legal status for illegal aliens, then do not claim to be in favor of secure borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

I love Bush. I love Tancredo.

Bush has been a great president in terms of his willingness and ability to lead a shooting war. And as his term comes to an end, I don't see anyone out there yet who I would trust with that job, except for some current administration members who have said they don't want the job (Cheney, for instance).

But as much as I appreciate Bush for his strengths, when it comes to the border he turns into a pussycat.

Tancredo is, in that sense, Bush-plus; he is one of the few people out there I would trust to defend America, and he is willing to go Bush one further and actually control the border.

At this point, I will not consider anyone who can not be trusted on those two points. Most things are negotiable, you take the lesser of two evils, but those two issues are not negotiable. I won't vote for anyone who I don't trust to go and get our enemies where they live, and I won't vote for anyone who won't take control of the border.


44 posted on 02/09/2006 1:33:08 PM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CBart95

Meantime you lfrdoggies: Where's your candidate for '08?
Name him/her!
Which one of you geniusses has an Immigration plan that will work?


45 posted on 02/09/2006 1:34:16 PM PST by CBart95
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Tom may be right and he may believe that such words need to be said, but I believe in Reagan’s 11th Commandment: "One shall not speak ill towards a fellow Republican".


46 posted on 02/09/2006 1:34:42 PM PST by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PRND21

Bay Buchanan, eh? Wonder how closely she mirrors her brother's very, shall we say, unOrthodox viewpoints.


47 posted on 02/09/2006 1:34:56 PM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Hayzo
I don't disagree with the poll numbers, but, I bet if they would frame questions around how you would prevent illegal immigation and the consequences of such actions, the numbers would get much more squishy. There are those beholden to cheap labor.

Those beholden to cheap labor have money, but not numbers. And a great many of them could probably be persuaded to content themselves with a guest-worker plant that is NOT available to illegals, such as the one Tancredo has proposed.

48 posted on 02/09/2006 1:35:44 PM PST by inquest (If you favor any legal status for illegal aliens, then do not claim to be in favor of secure borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
The dirty little secret is more "profile" policing is happening at our borders then is being reported about.

Is there a problem with illegal immigration.....most certainly. Especially in terms of those coming to this Country and not having any intention of assimilation....or to understanding and believing in our values, and way of life.

However it terms of our National borders being left "wide open" and this being a huge national security threat that GWB has completely ignored. That is 110% hogwash, BS!

The reality is more is happening (against a specific profile) then is being made public (for the obvious reasons!).

An additional reality is if terrorists could (can) simply cross our borders at will and there is absolutely nothing happening to stop them.....we would have been attacked again by now. Throw all the BS hyperbole about "they plan and wait a long time, blah, blah, blah"....Yeah! Pre-9/11 maybe. Pre-as$ kicking they received in Stan, pre-as$ kicking they received in Iraq, pre-as$ kicking they are continually receiving in both Countries still and throughout the ME!

The reality is should more be done with regard to the border. Most certainly. But the notion that the sky is falling, we're all going to die unless blow-hards like Tancredo take over is absolute BS!

Tancredo (whom I don't mind intellectually) is moving in the direction more and more of simply becoming another slice of the MSM fear hype machine .....simply for his own personal reasons / gains (he thinks).

49 posted on 02/09/2006 1:36:02 PM PST by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: yobid
>>I said to myself, "self", because that's what I've been calling myself lately......

LOL!

Hey wait, that's what I call myself too.. yobid you need to get a different name, this is WAR!!!

</humor>
50 posted on 02/09/2006 1:36:26 PM PST by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CBart95
Which one of you geniusses has an Immigration plan that will work?

You mean one that would be acceptable to the powers-that-be currently in charge, or one that would have positive effects once it's implemented?

51 posted on 02/09/2006 1:37:55 PM PST by inquest (If you favor any legal status for illegal aliens, then do not claim to be in favor of secure borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
CPAC is the largest annual gathering of conservatives in the country. It is supported by the American Conservative Union, Young American's Foundation and the conservative publication, Human Events. All four links have been posted on conservative Free Republic's HomePage for years. Tom Tancredo is talking to the conservative movement in America. I see no problem with his political activities in this matter.

Link to CPAC 2006.

52 posted on 02/09/2006 1:39:09 PM PST by Reagan Man (Secure our borders;punish employers who hire illegals;stop all welfare to illegals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
If the House Immigration Caucus won't support Tanc's bill, who will?

As for all the money that Tanc is raising for Pat and Bay, Tancredo considers that to be a good investment. He thinks that with the proper training from Pat, and Bay providing her administrative skills, he will be able to assume the mantle from Pat.

Of course you understand, Tancredo, like Buchanan, doesn't really want to be Prez, he just wants to raise campaign contributions.

The problem tho, is that Tanc will never be more than a pimple on Pat's butt. Pat has got that whisper of urgency in his voice while Tanc has got only a nasal whine.

53 posted on 02/09/2006 1:40:15 PM PST by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: inquest
He flaps his gums. He has an opinion on everything. He never does anything but pontificate. He's going to make an embarassing run for president and his bloviating and posturing will just undermine the point he's trying to make.

It makes him look a fool.

54 posted on 02/09/2006 1:40:23 PM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: DevSix
An additional reality is if terrorists could (can) simply cross our borders at will and there is absolutely nothing happening to stop them.....we would have been attacked again by now.

Who said anything about there being "absolutely nothing" to stop them?

By the way, even the administration has been forced to acknowledge that the border presents a security problem.

55 posted on 02/09/2006 1:42:39 PM PST by inquest (If you favor any legal status for illegal aliens, then do not claim to be in favor of secure borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
No child left out of socialism act is a definite loser.

If No Child Left Behind (or out of socialism) had been proposed by Bill or Hillary, Republicans would have, well let's just say they would have needed a new pair of pants.

Instead, one the biggest intrusions of federal government into local issues since the days of FDR was welcomed with applause (and not just from democrats).
56 posted on 02/09/2006 1:43:07 PM PST by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin
he will be able to assume the mantle from Pat.

Sounds painful.

57 posted on 02/09/2006 1:43:49 PM PST by PRND21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: kerryusama04

If Tancredo is the "only hope" I quit already....


58 posted on 02/09/2006 1:44:35 PM PST by MikefromOhio (Brokeback Mountain: The ONLY western where the Cowboys GET IT IN THE END!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
He has an opinion on everything.

Funny, most of the criticism of him up to now has been that he's a "single issue" candidate. Guess you just can't please everyone.

59 posted on 02/09/2006 1:44:50 PM PST by inquest (If you favor any legal status for illegal aliens, then do not claim to be in favor of secure borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq
No one will miss you.
60 posted on 02/09/2006 1:45:45 PM PST by inquest (If you favor any legal status for illegal aliens, then do not claim to be in favor of secure borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 561-564 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson