Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/09/2006 11:55:22 AM PST by iPod Shuffle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: iPod Shuffle

does this mean the islam crowd will not be allowed to use cartoons of the evil "jooooze"? or Christians?

or do they just want a one way right.

Hard to have a 21st century discussion with a 8th century mentality.


2 posted on 02/09/2006 11:57:36 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iPod Shuffle

They should add it in right after the anti-jihad clause.


3 posted on 02/09/2006 11:57:40 AM PST by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iPod Shuffle
Ahh, blasphemy against religion or just against the religion of terrorism (Islam)?
4 posted on 02/09/2006 11:58:29 AM PST by PeteB570 (Guns, what real men want for Christmas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iPod Shuffle

Go right ahead. Islam claims Jesus was merely a prophet. That's blasphemy and therefore Islam wil be illegal.


5 posted on 02/09/2006 11:58:42 AM PST by sumocide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iPod Shuffle

UN = Unwanted Nuisance


6 posted on 02/09/2006 11:59:12 AM PST by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iPod Shuffle
I am certain they would be willing to trade that for Israels right to exist.
7 posted on 02/09/2006 11:59:17 AM PST by SF Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iPod Shuffle

Can we also add an anti-gutter religion clause? Oh, pretty please Mr. 'martyr' sir!?


8 posted on 02/09/2006 12:00:13 PM PST by TeddyCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iPod Shuffle

Oh, so, the U.N. is something that should be listened to and respected when it's for a Muslim cause but when muslim countries wanna do what they wanna do I.E. WMD's it's okay for them to thumb there nose at them.


11 posted on 02/09/2006 12:04:28 PM PST by diverteach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iPod Shuffle

Hasn't the U.N. been closed yet?

Somebody pull the plug on that dinosaur.


12 posted on 02/09/2006 12:04:58 PM PST by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iPod Shuffle

Anti blasphemy laws with these freaks will mean no one can say “Muhammad was a pedophile and a terrorist and that’s just for openers” No one will be able to tell the truth about the evil man who was in fact a terrorist and child rapist

No one will be able to utter “there is no Allah and Muhammad is a false prophet”


13 posted on 02/09/2006 12:05:22 PM PST by dennisw ("What one man can do another can do" - The Edge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iPod Shuffle

Does New Zealand want to give up it's freedoms?


14 posted on 02/09/2006 12:07:32 PM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iPod Shuffle
The article left out the part where it was learned that the most offensive cartoons were faked and included by Danish Imams as a (successful) propaganda ploy to inflame Muslims. That's sort of important in the context of asking the UN to ban "blasphemy".

Aside from that dezinformatzia, how in the world does the UN, a secular body, decide what's blasphemy or not? Do all world religions have an input so that nobody anywhere can blaspheme any religion?

And what about religions who feel that anyone not of their religion is a blasphemer, and what if there are two of them?

Things are getting interesting way too fast. Wish my crystal ball could reach six months ahead (pardons to those who think scrying is blasphemy).
17 posted on 02/09/2006 12:10:22 PM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iPod Shuffle

http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/773

We, too, want to live in peace, but for the short time that we, Europeans, still have before the era of Eurabia, we want to do so in our land according to our rules, not those of islam. Jyllands-Posten wondered whether this was still possible in a country with a Muslim minority. It found out that when a country has let in a Muslim minority it has let in the Muslim majority from the rest of the globe. Today Muslim radicals set the Middle East on fire, bullying their religious minorities, because we dare to “disrespect” them, our religious minority (which our political leaders have so foolishly allowed to enter our countries), by printing mild cartoons in our newspapers.


18 posted on 02/09/2006 12:13:41 PM PST by dennisw ("What one man can do another can do" - The Edge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iPod Shuffle

One religion's dogma is another religion's blasphemy. This could get interesting.


19 posted on 02/09/2006 12:15:01 PM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iPod Shuffle

Blasphemy prosecutions conflict with free speech. The US delegation should push hard for a Right to be free from the threat of anti-blasphemy laws... but don't hold yer breath.


22 posted on 02/09/2006 12:27:24 PM PST by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iPod Shuffle


...are we talking blasphemy, or just blasphemy against Islam?


23 posted on 02/09/2006 12:28:49 PM PST by Tzimisce (How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iPod Shuffle

Okay.....ONLY after all the Arab publications and broadcasts come under the SAME RESTRICTIONS for ALL RELIGIONS...

It will NEVER happen..
We should NEVER afford the bastards ANY considerations they are not willing to offer and INFORCE in return..

F'em.

Semper Fi


25 posted on 02/09/2006 12:30:20 PM PST by river rat (You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iPod Shuffle

I believe child sacrifice (i.e. suicide bombings condoned and encouraged by parents), honor killings, beheadings, and female genital mutilation are blasphemous. Can we get those outlawed too?


26 posted on 02/09/2006 12:35:29 PM PST by Dems_R_Losers (Only losers boast about how close it was)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iPod Shuffle

So they want the U.N. to take our freedoms away? Figures...they can't win the WOT, they can't win in the war of ideas........so get the U.N. to cower to their demands. Sounds like their last shot at it.


29 posted on 02/09/2006 12:37:47 PM PST by tioga (Speaking out from the god-foresaken frozen tundra of the land of the hildebeast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: iPod Shuffle

Only if freedom of religeon is allowed in Moslem countries


30 posted on 02/09/2006 12:44:54 PM PST by RaginRak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson