Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Exploit turns up heat for Firefox flaw
CNet News ^ | 8 February 2006 | Joris Evers

Posted on 02/09/2006 9:50:40 AM PST by ShadowAce

Computer code that could be used in cyberattacks on Firefox users has been released, increasing the urgency for people to upgrade to the latest version of the Web browser.

The two pieces of exploit code, posted online earlier this week, take advantage of a security vulnerability in Firefox that Mozilla patched in an update Thursday. In response to the exploit release, the browser maker on Tuesday upgraded the severity rating of the flaw from "moderate" to "critical," its most serious rating.

"This exploit was published after we released the 1.5.0.1 update," said Mike Schroepfer, vice president of engineering at Mozilla. "Most of our users had already been upgraded by the time this exploit was published."

The code could be used to commandeer computers running a vulnerable version of the open-source Web browser on Linux or Mac OS X systems. It has been published as part of the Metasploit Framework, a widely used hacking tool.

The specific flaw exists only in Firefox 1.5 and was fixed in Firefox 1.5.0.1. The problem could cause a memory corruption an outsider could use to run code on a vulnerable PC, according to a Mozilla advisory. The corruption would come from calling the "QueryInterface" method of the Location and Navigator objects in the browser.

Firefox users have already been urged to install the patched version of the browser. Security monitoring company Secunia last week rated the Firefox update "highly critical," and Mozilla has pushed out updates.

If for some reason users have not upgraded, they should definitely do so, Schroepfer said.


TOPICS: Technical
KEYWORDS: exploits; firefox; patch
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: JoJo Gunn
JoJo, If you were a goood extension writer you would write some of your extensions so that the 0.0.0.1 version change would not adversly affect it. When I upgraded my windows box I had to replace not *1* extension (I use about 4).

I think writing software so that its easy to interface with for a third party is a good thing! Now maybe they need a separate project at mozilla to certify the cream from the crap in the extensions pile but its certainly not the job of the people who code FireFox itself.

If I'd been an extension writer, I'd have long ago given up on trying to keep up with the changes, and some have.

And others have written extensions that survive a version change.

41 posted on 02/09/2006 2:13:59 PM PST by N3WBI3 (If SCO wants to go fishing they should buy a permit and find a lake like the rest of us..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: JoJo Gunn

Spoken with all the zealotry and bitterness I'd expect.

Good day.


42 posted on 02/09/2006 2:16:48 PM PST by Terpfen (72-25: The Democrats mounted a failibuster!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: JoJo Gunn
The venom in post #38 sure would lead someone to suspect that was the case.

Also "Mozilla is not ready for Prime Time and never will be. " is a pretty sweeping statement. One tends to wonder what is behind such comments.

43 posted on 02/09/2006 2:19:02 PM PST by zeugma (Muslims are varelse...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: JoJo Gunn
Mozilla is not ready for Prime Time and never will be.

Because some poorly written third party software breaks FireFox itself is not ready?

It's only a curiosity for geeks.

A 10% market share says differently, with the exception of IE it is bigger than every browser out there *PUT TOGETHER*. But Im am sure to you there is only one browser and bill gates is its Profit.

For close to a year there was a major flaw, where uninstalling Firefox took out the whole frickin' Program Files folder with it.

So because it *used* to have a flaw its not now ready for prime time? wow!

Why should I sing the praises of something like that?

Who asked you to? my question is why are you trolling FR threads and, apparently, MoZine for something you dont use and dont like?

44 posted on 02/09/2006 2:19:38 PM PST by N3WBI3 (If SCO wants to go fishing they should buy a permit and find a lake like the rest of us..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat

What an ignorant statement.


45 posted on 02/09/2006 2:45:23 PM PST by Doohickey (If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice...I will choose freewill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Doohickey
What an ignorant statement.

Accurate after the recent WMF fiasco.

46 posted on 02/09/2006 2:49:11 PM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3

Ooooh la la! All of a sudden I have three fanbois on my back, alluding that I'm some kind of MS troll. If the fanbois would'nt get so frenzied they might check out my posts over the years concerning Mozilla, my fights with Bush2000, etc.

All you guys are doing is making my point for me. I or anyone else need not go to MoZine to find the zit farmers who knows all.

Firefox is not ready for the general populace. It's still a lab rat.

Live with it.


47 posted on 02/09/2006 2:57:45 PM PST by JoJo Gunn (Help control the Leftist population. Have them spayed or neutered. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: JoJo Gunn
alluding that I'm some kind of MS troll.

I don't think you're an MS troll, I never said so... I asked if you don't use firefox and hate firefox why are you here and why do you spend so much time on MoZine?

All you guys are doing is making my point for me.

Hmm what point would that be, people here have asked question and gotten at worst "Ill have to look at that later but Ill check it out for you". You OTOH came spoiling for a fight.

Firefox is not ready for the general populace.

Based on what? some people have written bad third party software for it? the fact that when it was beta more than a year ago the upgrade utility was poorly implemented? the fact that they dont lock people out of interfacing and writing extensions for it? or the fact it has a higher market share than every browser on the market except IE?

48 posted on 02/09/2006 3:10:50 PM PST by N3WBI3 (If SCO wants to go fishing they should buy a permit and find a lake like the rest of us..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Terpfen
Don't blame Mozilla for the faults of third-party stuff.

Why not?  That's the standard for blaming Microsoft.

49 posted on 02/09/2006 3:12:32 PM PST by Psycho_Bunny (I don't capitalize "barbarian" so why capitalize "muslim"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: D-Chivas; Terpfen
That sounds like an issue with your installation, not 1.5, especially given that there aren't many others complaining about such problems. Give 1.5.0.1 a try.

Could be a third-party installation problem. On a Linux forum this week, I saw someone complaining of problems with 1.5.0.1. Turned out they installed from a third-party, rather than from Mozilla directly. Problems cleared up with the new official installation.
50 posted on 02/09/2006 3:13:51 PM PST by clyde asbury (Belief suspending)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Psycho_Bunny

Really? example?


51 posted on 02/09/2006 3:16:21 PM PST by N3WBI3 (If SCO wants to go fishing they should buy a permit and find a lake like the rest of us..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Eaker

Read at home ping.


52 posted on 02/09/2006 3:16:40 PM PST by Eaker (My Wife Rocks! - Islam is the cancer, the US Military and Militia is the answer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3

Oh, puleeze.


53 posted on 02/09/2006 3:20:39 PM PST by Psycho_Bunny (I don't capitalize "barbarian" so why capitalize "muslim"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Psycho_Bunny

example?


54 posted on 02/09/2006 3:21:10 PM PST by N3WBI3 (If SCO wants to go fishing they should buy a permit and find a lake like the rest of us..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Psycho_Bunny

That should change, too.

I don't blame Microsoft when the problem isn't their fault.


55 posted on 02/09/2006 3:27:10 PM PST by Terpfen (72-25: The Democrats mounted a failibuster!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3
You never had a BSD after installing a kludged driver on a video card?

Hell, Sound Blaster was in business for a couple years before they figured out how to write a driver that didn't crash 1 out of 20 Windows boxes.

Probably 90% of every BSD I ever saw was related to a third-party coder, but 100% of them were blamed on MS.

Not that MS doesn't deserve most of the hostility towards it as pertains to security and application execution.

 

56 posted on 02/09/2006 3:29:25 PM PST by Psycho_Bunny (I don't capitalize "barbarian" so why capitalize "muslim"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

I hate that my favorite Theme, Charamel, is not supported by FF 1.5 and above. I hesitate to update to the latest version of Thunderbird because I'm afraid I'll lose Charamel there, too.


57 posted on 02/09/2006 3:31:28 PM PST by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3
"ONLY* its popularity and that is flat out wrong."

agree, but it has a BIG part of it. i notice my opera browser gets less warning then FF or IE. is it more secure? no, it's in deep third place.

the only true advantage to open source is that stuff gets fix fast.

BTW: opera rock!

(smiles)
58 posted on 02/09/2006 3:51:05 PM PST by postaldave (democrats=traitorous b*st*rds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3

Spoiling for a fight? You argue like a Leftist. I made a post, some pinhead tried to give me a lecture about anger, and I lit into him like stench on a hippie. Then you and another decided to jump in. Don't try and blame me for your being a banty rooster.

By the way, Foghorn, I used to spend time at MoZine, until I saw it for what it is. Don't act like you know with seeming authoity where I surf or not.

As far as it not being ready for just anyone, how many have just grown tired of all the changes? How many Mom and Pop types want to keep up with it? I'm no IT guy, but I'm an informed enough type I won't get taken for a ride when I go to Best Buy, but all in all a computer user, and I've grown tired of the geek and tweak appeal.

I know that Firefox is a bunch of people trying to break the Mozilla browser down into components. Maybe that's part of the problem. Too many cooks, and no recipe, no well defined roadmap. I find it astonishing that such a major flaw as erasing the whole Program Files folder taking a year to fix not only doesn't raise any eyebrows, but brings the fanboi types to shoot the messenger with such idiocy as "ummm, well, it don't do it now, does it"? It took almost a year to fix something that at the very least crippled the OS, for crying out loud! Sell that to the general populace.

No, I'm sure you'd rather keep that quiet. Let's not give anybody any doubts as to who is at the helm of their wonderful alternative browsing experience.

And yet I'm supposed to take the fanbois seriously and sing in harmony? Yeah, right.


59 posted on 02/09/2006 4:08:44 PM PST by JoJo Gunn (Help control the Leftist population. Have them spayed or neutered. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: JoJo Gunn

Correction:

Technically, it's the Netscape browser they're cannibalizing. Netscape gave the the source code back in '98.


60 posted on 02/09/2006 4:52:18 PM PST by JoJo Gunn (Help control the Leftist population. Have them spayed or neutered. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson