It's "for the children" - you know.
/jasper
Posted on 02/08/2006 7:07:51 PM PST by Calpernia
they HADNT ruled yet.
>>>the Farm Bureau and the Cattlemens' Association
They already signed on to NAIS.
You know Rick Stott?
http://www.animalagriculture.org/proceedings/2005ID/Cattle/Northwest%20Pilot%20Projects%20-%20Rick%20Stott.ppt
Northwest Pilot Project Mr. Rick Stott, Agri Beef Company
He handed over the entire cattle list to NAIS. They have all been entered into the database as a premise already with no vote.
Dang. No, I was not in the loop about that. The group down here in AZ usually fights pretty much everything. Obviously, some other places do not. Perhaps this is why this was not put to a vote?
>>>>While it may be true that the United States exerts considerable control over the United Nations at present, this may not always be the case.
If you go to my thread linked at post 1, the CFRs that create the terms and conditions of receiving the NGO monies that are merged with our governmental departments say, that the GRANTOR which is the NGOs, own the properties the grant monies touch.
The GRANTOR monies are merged with our DOD, CDC and Department of health.
AZ is Arizona, right?
http://www.pimall.com/nais/d-az.html
NAIS MEMBERSHIP DIRECTORY ARIZONA
This state directory contains listings mainly of private investigators.
There are also may be listings of attorneys, law enforcement people,
security services, polygraph services, in house investigators for law firms, collection agencies, recovery agents, other law enforcement and forensics personal and other trade craft related
to the profession which is stated as such in each individual listing that are NOT licensed to perform
private investigative services. Before hiring any private investigator, you should
contact the following state licensing authority to confirm current licensing information.
To check on a state private investigative license, contact:
Department Of Public Safety
http://www.dps.state.az.us/
If you notice a listing that has a license that is no longer valid,
please contact us for removal: RThomas007@aol.com
Sorry, wrong link the first time:
http://animalid.aphis.usda.gov/nais/spotlights/Arizona_spotlight_0305.html
Arizona Department of Agriculture
1688 W. Adams Street, Phoenix, Arizona 85007 (602) 542-4373 FAX (602) 542-5420
MEDIA ADVISORY
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
RELEASE DATE: March 2, 2005
MEDIA CONTACT: Katie Decker, 602-542-0958
Arizona Initiates Animal Identification Program – Worth $3 Million
(Phoenix) -- “To individually number all flocks could be a good thing, but it’s tough to find an ear on a chicken,”
says Clint Hickman of Hickman’s Egg Ranch, but The Arizona Department of Agriculture is actively working with
New Mexico, Colorado, the Navajo nation and Hopi tribe, through a $3.55 million program, that will create a premises I.D. for chickens and shrimp farms and animal I.D. for nearly every animal in Arizona, including cattle, camels and llamas. This even applies to 4-H animals and backyard livestock.
This is one more step in protecting Arizonans food supply because should anything ever be found, the Arizona Department of Agriculture will be able to trace a potential threat back to the animal within 48 hours. In addition, such programs ensure the following.
* Foreign Animal Disease control, surveillance, and prevention
* Biosecurity protection of the national herd
* Identification of livestock vaccinated or tested under official disease control or eradication program
* Official identification of animals in interstate or international commerce
* Accurate identification of blood and tissue specimens
* Improvement of laboratory diagnostic and reporting capabilities
* Health status certification of herds, States, and Regions
* Effective regionalization and risk assessment in support of international trade
Many producers are concerned about privacy and as a result, a third company will be keeping premises registration data.
State and federal animal health officials will have access to the data as needed.
This program is voluntary and the Department is trying to have 20 percent state-wide compliance by the end of this year.
“We would much rather have it voluntary, than have to force the producers to comply,” says Don Butler, Director of the Arizona Department of Agriculture. “Eventually, it will be mandatory.”
Each premises will be given a number and/or each animal will receive a tag, which will be either embedded or attached to the animal, costs $3, but the Arizona Department of Agriculture will be picking up the tab during the voluntary period as an incentive. This is one of many preliminary programs around the nation and the data will eventually be put in a national database when the program becomes mandatory. No date for mandatory compliance has been established.
www.agriculture.state.az.us
It's "for the children" - you know.
/jasper
>>>Many producers are concerned about privacy and as a result, a third company will be keeping premises registration data.
State and federal animal health officials will have access to the data as needed.
And do not believe that one for a minute. In order to receive the grant monies, a Freedom of informatin act had to be signed. That means full access to the database will be audited by the GRANTOR as per the CFR.
It has to be to comply with the EU/WTO agreement which can be viewed here:
http://nationalpropertyowners.org/CFRInfo.html
“We would much rather have it voluntary, than have to force the producers to comply,” says Don Butler, Director of the Arizona Department of Agriculture. “Eventually, it will be mandatory.”
>>>the Arizona Department of Agriculture will be picking up the tab during the voluntary period as an incentive.
This is the scary part. The monies being used to help with the registration are the monies from the NGOs.
Look at the wording from the CFRs for when their monies are used:
(d) The Grantee shall not encumber, transfer or dispose of any property, equipment or other asset, or any part thereof, acquired wholly or in part with Grantor funds without the written consent of the Grantor,
(e) Grantees shall adequately control and safeguard all assets associated with the grant to ensure that they are used solely for authorized purposes,
(f) Grantor shall monitor performance in accordance with the applicable terms of the Agreement. Grantor reserves the right to monitor meetings and request documents applicable to the terms of the Agreement.
Dear Donna, I am atill attempting to regain my mental health after eight years of you and the other fruitcakes in the Clinton administration. I still have nightmares of Jocelyn Elders in a teddy standing over me saying, "Let me teach you how to masturbate, big boy!"
It isn't just NAIS though. Look back at post one at the 28 other programs. They all come with these grant monies. When your state signs on for all those monies, is the state a USA state?
What happens with the federal officials too?
Never question my insanity.
That is just plain scary.
1. You are mentally ill (especially because you believe America is the greatest country on Earth and you hate gays and commies).
2. You need to be given psychotropic drugs to 'cure' this mental illness.
3. Mental Health is defined as any unwanted thought or emotion (unwanted by whom is not defined at this time but the Annointed may determine that for you at any time in the future).
4. Your refusal to agree to this program is another sign of your mental illness and further proof that you need medication until you become compliant and agreeable.
/
Read 'Vision Of The Annointed' by Thomas Sowell and this will all become clear.
ping...in case you have not seen this...
This part really ties it all together:
Monitoring the progress of mental Health for All (HFA) is essential to the process of managed change. Non-compliance or dissent must be spotted, reported, and corrected before it spreads. Even "a substantial risk" of failure to conform could bring preventative correction. Remediation, conflict resolution, and other mind changing strategies include these steps:
challenge traditional values *
evoke strong feelings *
produce cognitive dissonance, a form of mental and moral confusion *
dialogue to consensus *
elicit a response that
1. demonstrates a change in attitude
2. can be measured
3. becomes part of a child's individual electronic data file
:-0
Getting attention? I'm getting freep mail with people wondering if I'm a DU sleeper waking up.
I want to be wrong here. What don't I understand?
Don't forget about this....
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1567623/posts
UN plans to release untapped wealth of $7 trillion (and solve the world's problems at a stroke)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.