Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Amnesty won't fix immigration woes
The Register-Guard ^ | Wednesday, February 8, 2006 | By Peter DeFazio

Posted on 02/08/2006 5:39:05 PM PST by Conservative Firster

America has a proud heritage as a beacon for the dispossessed and oppressed, who come from around the world for a shot at achieving their dreams.

However, a nation that does not control its own borders is not secure. We need to know who is coming into our country, and we must keep out people who are not authorized to enter. With 500,000 or more people entering illegally every year, the status quo is not acceptable.

Prior efforts by Congress to control immigration - including reforms enacted in 1986 and 1996 - failed for lack of meaningful employer sanctions. As a result, undocumented workers have been used and abused, driving down wages, benefits and working conditions for all workers.

The border security legislation I voted for, House Resolution 4437, addresses this issue by requiring employers to verify a job applicant's eligibility with immigration and Social Security officials, rather than a cursory look at easily forged documents. The bill doubles the fines for employers who knowingly hire undocumented workers to a minimum of $5,000 for a first offense and up to $40,000 for subsequent offenses.

H.R. 4437 also improves border security by deploying more personnel and requiring enhanced technology. The bill would end the ``catch and release'' program, in which illegal immigrants caught at the border from countries other than Mexico are released once they promise to return for a court date. Not surprisingly, more than 75 percent never show up and remain in the country illegally. (Mexicans caught at the border are immediately deported.)

Critics of the border security bill reject legislation based on strong enforcement and security, arguing that all that is necessary is a guest worker program and amnesty. I admit that H.R. 4437 is not a finished legislative product, and I did not support every provision in it. But it has kick-started a long overdue debate in Congress on immigration.

I am not convinced there is a labor shortage that requires the importation of 550,000 or more guest workers every year, as envisioned by the immigration reform bill sponsored by Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Ted Kennedy, D-Mass. - which also allows family members to come along, doubling or tripling the number of new arrivals. Only after improving wages and working conditions and proving that no Americans are available for the job should an employer be able to recruit guest workers.

I am concerned that guest worker proposals will continue to erode the wages and working conditions of tens of millions of Americans and legal immigrants. The Commission on Immigration Reform, created in 1995 by President Bill Clinton, reported, "Guest worker programs have depressed wages" and reduced employment opportunities for "unskilled American workers, including recent immigrants," who can be easily "displaced by newly entering guest workers."

Other studies, including research by the National Research Council and the liberal Economic Policy Institute, show immigrants under guest worker programs are paid 15 percent to 33 percent less than U.S. citizens, even in highly skilled jobs, driving down wages for all workers.

All workers deserve the protection of labor laws. In fact, existing guest worker programs already nominally provide such protections, but they are not enforced. The lack of enforcement has reached crisis proportions. I don't believe that will magically change under a new guest worker program.

I do not support amnesty proposals that treat every immigrant the same way. It makes no sense to treat someone who entered illegally last week the same as someone who has been in the country for a decade or more, gainfully employed and paying taxes, with children who are U.S. citizens.

Currently, more than 4 million immigrants around the world are waiting for their paperwork to be processed so they can enter the U.S. legally. It will be years (in the case of Mexico and the Philippines, often 10 years or more) before they can enter the country under current quotas. Blanket amnesty for the 11 million already here illegally could delay or prevent the legal immigration of those who are complying with the law. I cannot support legislation that would hurt families following the rules.

I honestly don't have a complete solution to this problem. But I do know that just implementing a new guest worker program and blanket amnesty will not solve the problem of illegal immigration. Nor will a solution that focuses solely on border security - though increased border security and employer sanctions, should be the foundation of any solution.

Peter DeFazio, a Springfield Democrat, represents Oregon's 4th District in the U.S. House of Representatives.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Oregon
KEYWORDS: aliens; borders; hr4437; immigrantlist; immigration

1 posted on 02/08/2006 5:39:08 PM PST by Conservative Firster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Conservative Firster

What we need is a punishment that they fear more than their home countries, that really is the bottom line. Even illegally here as mere helots, they are immensely better off than where they came from.


2 posted on 02/08/2006 5:40:50 PM PST by thoughtomator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: Conservative Firster

A Democrat wrote that? Smart guy. He obviously knows what is going to be important in the upcoming elections, unlike the GOP.


4 posted on 02/08/2006 5:42:49 PM PST by Trteamer ( (Eat Meat, Wear Fur, Own Guns, FReep Leftists, Drive an SUV, Drill A.N.W.R., Drill the Gulf, Vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Firster
Peter DeFazio, a Springfield Democrat, represents Oregon's 4th District in the U.S. House of Representatives

Hey CONGRESS CRITTER. How about instead of endlessly whining, how about you use the power of your office to actually PUT forward legislation? Typical Democrat Pol, he will make all the noises people WANT to hear but do NOTHING. Put your VOTE where your mouth is Congress Critter. Do something. Why the hell do we have a Co Equal branch of Govt called CONGRESS if they can DO nothing but whine about EVERYTHING? Curious how this guy voted on approprations for the Border Patrol. How much you want to bet he has a record of talking tough but DOING nothing.

5 posted on 02/08/2006 5:45:14 PM PST by MNJohnnie ("Vote Democrat-We are the party of reactionary inertia".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trteamer
Yeah. Amazing how people are so giddy cause a guy mouths off but DOES nothing. Maybe instead of being so giddy cause he SAID something people should be asking WHAT is he doing. As usual it all talk and no action and people are HAPPY about it.
6 posted on 02/08/2006 5:46:55 PM PST by MNJohnnie ("Vote Democrat-We are the party of reactionary inertia".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Yep, people are happy when their politician says something about controlling illegals. But when it comes down to voting their hands are tied by corruption.

The government may be the most corrupt of all. Taking in billions every year in the form of social security and taxes paid to fake i.d. numbers. Building a huge bureacracy to take care of these illegals and all the problems they cause.

Think about that for a while folks!


7 posted on 02/08/2006 6:04:31 PM PST by Trteamer ( (Eat Meat, Wear Fur, Own Guns, FReep Leftists, Drive an SUV, Drill A.N.W.R., Drill the Gulf, Vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Trteamer

How many times are you going to let them lie to you? He is DOING nothing. Words from a politician are so much useless noise.


8 posted on 02/08/2006 6:20:46 PM PST by MNJohnnie ("Vote Democrat-We are the party of reactionary inertia".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Firster

Even some of the Democrats are beginning to get it. The issue will only grow in importance with time. We will eventually have secure borders.


9 posted on 02/08/2006 8:09:29 PM PST by Colorado Buckeye (It's the culture stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Firster
I am concerned that guest worker proposals will continue to erode the wages and working conditions of tens of millions of Americans and legal immigrants. The Commission on Immigration Reform, created in 1995 by President Bill Clinton, reported, "Guest worker programs have depressed wages" and reduced employment opportunities for "unskilled American workers, including recent immigrants," who can be easily "displaced by newly entering guest workers."

DeFazio is a lefty but once in a while he gets it right. More and more of them are admitting it everyday. This is going to be an interesting coalition. Talk about "big tent". LOL!

10 posted on 02/08/2006 11:01:07 PM PST by WatchingInAmazement ("Nothing is more expensive than cheap labor," prof. Vernon Briggs, labor economist Cornell Un.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson