The article ends:
"Those who have bet their political futures that Saddam had no WMD may be starting to sweat."
John Loftus, a former Justice Department prosecutor, who delivered the latest Sadaam tapes on WMDs to Congress had this to say, "This isn't a smoking gun. It's a smoking cannon."
There will be massive resistance to these disclosures, whatever their exact contents, because so many have a lot invested in the proposition that there were no WMDs in Iraq.
Every effort will be made to discredit or bury the information.
but minister lowery just told us that there were no wmds over there during his anti bush tirade at coretta's funeral, and everybody cheered. you tellin me THE MINISTER IS A LYING DEMOCRAT WHORE just like bill and hitlery?
When Jim Lehrer was interviewing Vice President Cheney, he said "We now know that there were no WMDs". Cheny totally sidestepped him, only choosing to say that the other part of Lehrer's question was correct. This left the distinct impression that the part about "no WMDs" was not correct.
I don't believe a thing!
All that stuff hidden is Syria was made in Texas!!!!!!
< /sarc >
Every effort will be made by the left and Democrats to bury the information. Back in the day of MSM (i.e., Democrat) monopoly on information, that would have worked. With today's new media (talk radio, blogs, Fox News, etc.), it will fail.
2006 is starting to look awfully bleak for the broke (financially and morally) Democraps. Their heads are going to explode over this one. They'll quickly move to a "we never cared about WMDs" posture or some other cop-out, though. And the "Bush lied, people died" crap will continue -- probably forever.
" John Loftus, a former Justice Department prosecutor, who delivered the latest Sadaam tapes on WMDs to Congress had this to say, "This isn't a smoking gun. It's a smoking cannon.""
The unbiased left wing media will never give a lot of time to this ESPECIALLY during an election year.
The Admin has known all this all along, but why would they sit on the info? Is it to avoid dragging Russia into this?
If the dems were wondering what the October surprise might be...they better be working up some excuses about why they lied about no WMDs and then attacked president Bush.
If this pans out, what are all the libs going to do with their "Bush lied!" signs, t-shirts, and other paraphernalia?
For that reason alone it just isn't fair to make any discovery of WMD public.
I pray about this every night. Right before the elections, we find the WMDs, capture OBL and Zarqawi.
On the face of it, the premise is ridiculous. It would run counter to everything we know about the man, his government, and his methods of operation.
This isn't necessarily new news, but the fact that the word is starting to catch on is. This could be a real sitcky wicket for the Dems if there is real proof by Fall.
I believe our govt.knows right where they are.I believe they just dont want to blow this stuff into the atmosphere.Our men and women on the front would be the first to get bombarded.
Can't wait for Feb. 17th. BTTT!
However, with the internet and talk radio - the info will get out - and it will be just another feather in Bush's cap - making the dems even more hateful and funnier than ever.
Since I'm late to the thread and have not the time to read all the posts, I would certainly like to make sure that Vlad Pootster is NOT America's friend.
The Soviet Russian leadership is aligned with Communist China and nearly all of America's other mortal enemies and they have all played America's leadership for fools, for too long.
bttt
The thing that bothers me most is that this Administration never seems to have had any dedicated follow-up. But it has always been allowing and cooperating with the cover-ups. From the Xlinton's skull-duggery before-during-and-after their occupancy in the White House, and on to the French, Germans and Kofi Annan who were implicated neck-deep in Saddam's UN Oil-For-Fraud program.
GWB is giving them all a pass. How nice of him to ignore his duty and oathe of office, to turn the official "cheek" for us.
Look at how Colin Powell was cozying up to Assad after the invasion. What was that about?! Whenever there is some nonsensical, counterintuitive, anti-common-sense position taken by the Administration, I assume that it is either a cover-up of some 'ally' interest...or we just have a raft of traitors too numerous to count.