Posted on 02/08/2006 10:58:05 AM PST by NormsRevenge
One of the many ugly secrets of the abortion industry and this is a business obsessed with secrecy is the fact that abortionists routinely conceal the worst form of sexual child abuse: rape. Many of its clients are confused and frightened youngsters who have been victimized by adults.
That is a crime. It is statutory rape. California has long outlawed statutory rape because as a society we understand the need to protect vulnerable children from adult predators. They call themselves boy friends. These men are neither boys nor friends. They are adults who prey on confused youngsters desperate for affection.
Anyone who has watched outside an abortion clinic for very long can describe the scene a man in his 20s hustling or even dragging a frightened and reluctant girl in her early teens into the building. Abortionists know well what is going on, but they ignore the crime. Their only concern is to kill the unborn baby, then send the young mother on her way, to be victimized again and again.
The abortion industry likes to pretend that statutory rape is not a major problem, but its own research arm, the Alan Guttmacher Institute, has documented the case against them. A Guttmacher survey showed that half of the babies born to mothers between ages 15 and 17 were fathered by adults 20 and older. A similar California survey found that two-thirds of the babies born to teenage mothers were fathered by adult men. In many cases, men in their twenties were victimizing sixth and seventh graders.
Those surveys only covered girls who had given birth to their babies. Its most likely that rape is even more common among those who have been subjected to abortion. We cant document those cases because abortionists operate behind a legal shield of secrecy. That shield is so tight that no one knows how many abortions are performed in California. The best estimate is 350,000 a year. Perhaps 60,000 or 70,000 abortions per year are performed in California on girls under 18.
Two years ago, I introduced a bill that would have pierced that shield. It would have required the abortion industry to report cases of pregnant minors as possible cases of child sexual abuse or rape. Why not? Their own studies show that as many as two-thirds of these youngsters have been victimized by adults. That made no difference. The abortion lobby turned out in full force to oppose this bill. They always do when their business is in jeopardy. The liberal-dominated Assembly Public Safety Committee, always happy to do their bidding, killed the bill.
This year I tried again. This time with AB 1427, a bill that would simply require that abortionists keep on file a DNA sample from each aborted baby whose mother is a minor. The idea behind the bill was simple. Sometime in the future, perhaps after years of torment, a young mother might go to the police to press charges against the predator who had fathered her child. If DNA evidence was available, he could be brought to justice.
Ironically, I presented my bill to the committee on the same day that it considered legislation declaring a death penalty moratorium in California. The committee spent a long time agonizing over that bill. In the end, the liberal majority voted to halt the executions of murderers. One of the key reasons was the possibility of DNA evidence proving the innocence of a death row inmate.
Then I came forward with my bill. Suddenly, the committee majority was no longer concerned about DNA evidence. The rules of the political game had been changed. Why? Because we were dealing with abortion, and for liberals abortion is a sacred right. The abortion lobby again staged an all-out assault and the Public Safety Committee quickly killed this bill, too.
So now sexual predators continue to roam free in California, victimizing youngsters and getting away with it, thanks to an Assembly Committee that is more concerned with preserving the ugly secrets of the abortion industry than with protecting vulnerable youngsters.
ping
You will never get a lib to understand why it should be illegal for a minor to get an abortion without consent. Aside from the parents needing to be aware their child is sexually active (possibly with an adult), they also would have no idea if something happened as a result of the abortion (ie:heavy bleeding/hemoraging). If they are not aware something happened, they wouldn't know to watch out for it. As the mother of three daughters, I am FURIOUS to know they can have SURGERY without my knowledge or consent, but yet my daughter got CHAPSTICK taken up in class the other day at school and my other daughter could not take a cough drop without my COMING INTO THE SCHOOL TO WRITE A NOTE GIVING PERSMISSION.
This country is doomed if it does not gain it's common sense back.
Planned Parenthood in Arizona has been involved with obstruction of justice. It seems that they encourage young women seeking abortion to lie about the identity of the father of there fetus. In many cases this amounts to a charge of conspiracy to commit rape after the fact. Could this also be happening in California?
Mountjoy has as much as admitted that
NOTHING about this problem will be
done until the Democrat liberals are
ousted from office in California.
People get what they ask for out there:
high taxes, high real estate prices,
growing rate of illiteracy, growing
number of illegals as well as citizens
on the public dole, growing crime rate,
growing number of affluent citizens
moving out of the state, et al.
Then there is the terrific influence
of Hollywood. They really know what
"Brokeback" means out there!
Thanks for the article, and the info on Dick Mounjoy. I am not familiar with him, and will have to do some research.
But since you have confessed that you don't know the difference between a 6 and 14 year old girls, you also don't seem to know the difference between child rape and marriage.
Dick Mountjoy has a long history in California and is a fine man, imo. His website bio is a good start.
He deserves all Californians support in ousting the leftist currently in the seat.
Worse than THAT... Sexual predators roam FREE in Washington D.C.. some making the laws that govern sexual predation.. and infanticide..
Lady Liberty has been quite fully raped.. and marketed..
Has he gotten much support from our so called Republican Leaders here in California?
Way back "in the day" of the Internet (1995-1998?), there was a case
in California in which a couple of boys got bad vibes about a neighbor.
They were savvy enough to check online state sex-offender registries...
and found their neighbor on the Texas state website.
(IIRC, Texas even had photos of some of their badboys on the Internet).
Back to Texas the perv went.
BUT, the reverse was not true for a long time. IIRC, even a few years
ago you had to go to the local police and try to pry information out
of them about suspected sex-offense convicts in your neighborhood.
I figure too many fruitloops in power in CA (Hollywood, SF) managed
to keep registries repressed in CA. Hopefully that's on the way out.
Data is precious and everyone wants it. I can't see the year 2050 come around and there still not be DNA collection on the aborted babies of minors.
I can't see us tossing or scrapping abortion DNA for privacy sake. How many of you have paper shredders at home? You have this for protection but my point exactly, people want data. You can't argue that the sexual predator needs a shredder. How silly.
I see the Right winning this one.
Legislation will probably end up addressing the wrong issue - as usual for the California Legislature.
Good question, the Ca GOP has been a silent partner for years when it comes to fielding much less backing viable senatorial challengers to DiFi and Babs.
It is a sad state of affairs at a state party leadership level, hopefully , the upcoming convention will; help to turn that around, but I wouldn't get my hopes up.
What about Crisis Pregnancy Centers? Do they report minors who come in pregnant as possible sex abuse victims?

Please FReepmail me if you would like to be added to, or removed from, the Pro-Life/Pro-Baby ping list...
Planned Parenthood Aids Statutory Rape
BY ROBERT KUMPEL
Christina Smith is 13, pregnant, and wants an abortion. She calls Planned Parenthood's Marengo Avenue clinic in Van Nuys and talks to Vanessa. She tells Vanessa that she wants an abortion and is worried about her age. Vanessa tells Christine that there is no age limit. Christine, worried that her parents might find out, asks if anyone has to know. She is assured that Planned Parenthood will tell no one. When Christine asks if her 22 year-old boyfriend can bring her for the abortion, Vanessa tells her that will be fine and asks her if she'd like to set up an appointment. Suddenly it hits Vanessa: "Okay. Hold on one second. How old are you?"
Christina: "I'll be 14 in March."
Vanessa: "Really?"
Christina: "Yeah."
Vanessa: "And do your -- I mean, this is just out of curiosity, but do your parents know that your boyfriend is 22?"
Christina: "Yeah. They just really don't like him."
Vanessa: "As long as you guys both are happy that's all that matters."
Christina goes on to tell Vanessa that she thinks she got pregnant in December. Vanessa tells her that the abortion will cost $290 and asks a few medical questions before setting a date for the procedure at Planned Parenthood's Van Nuys clinic. Before hanging up, Christina asks one more time if anyone will be told about the abortion. Vanessa assures her that no parental consent is needed and no one will be told without Christina's permission.
During this phone call, Vanessa and her employers have complied with a misdemeanor, since healthcare workers and social service agencies are mandated by law to report child abuse, which Christina Smith is a victim of, as her pregnancy is the result of statutory rape.
Fortunately, "Christina Smith" was the undercover alias of a caller from Life Dynamics, a nonprofit pro-life agency in Denton, Texas. This call (Tape 151) and 92 others like it can be heard at http://tapes.yeson73.net. The tapes document similar inquiries made to abortion clinics throughout the state of California and provide a chilling scenario of just how little effort is required for a minor girl to get an abortion. While a few of the clinic agents warn Christina that her boyfriend will have to be reported, many do not.
J.T. Finn, 45, is the director of Pro Life America, a California agency that specializes in reaching young people and publishes Love Matters, a magazine that focuses on celebrity testimonials supporting chastity and respect for life. Finn took over the Yes on 73 website and was responsible for posting the recordings on the website. After he discovered the tapes, he found them to be an effective tool to demonstrate what's wrong with abortion law in California. "Whenever anyone heard those tapes, they were shocked and horrified. Unfortunately, most of the people who heard them were already on our side in the first place."
The recordings are among hundreds of phone conversations placed by a 24 year-old employee of Life Dynamics in 2001, when she called every abortion clinic in America to document their policies on reporting the activities of young women who are victims of sexual abuse and statutory rape. Life Dynamics' founder, Mark Crutcher, is outraged by the common practice of abortion providers violating mandated reporting laws of underaged sexual activity with adults. "The Attorney General of Kansas, Phil Kline, and the Indiana Attorney General Steve Carter have both opened investigations into abortion clinics refusal to report minors sexually abused by adults. There are other states opening investigations too, but I can't comment on those."
One source close to the parental notification initiative effort says that the tapes were only available the last couple of months of the Proposition 73 campaign and will be used more widely the next time. "They were very powerful," the source said. "When they were brought up in debates during the last campaign, there was dead silence. Planned Parenthood's complicity in pedophilia could not be countered. There was complete silence on the other side."
Thanks for the ping!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.