Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Muslims Picket 'Philadephia Inquirer' After It Runs Cartoon
editorsandpublishers.com ^ | Feb. 7, 2005 | E&P Staff

Posted on 02/07/2006 10:26:38 AM PST by summer

NEW YORK -- On Saturday, the Philadelphia Inquirer became one of the first major U.S. papers to carry a drawing featuring Muhammad -- with a lit bomb stuck in his turban -- that have sparked riots abroad. On Monday, more than two dozen Muslims offended by that decision picketed the newspaper.

"It's disrespectful to us as a people," Asim Abdur-Rashid, an imam with the Majlis Ash'Shura, an umbrella group for mosques in the Delaware Valley, told the Inquirer for a story today. "It's disrespectful to our prophet to imply that he's a prophet of violence."

The group may call for a boycott and a further protest on Friday if the newspaper does not apologize.

Amanda Bennett, The Inquirer's editor, and Carl Lavin, a deputy managing editor, talked with the protesters outside the building.

"Neither I nor the newspaper meant any disrespect to their religion or their prophet," Bennett said in her paper. "I told them I was actually really proud of them for exercising their right to freedom of speech."

But Bennett stood by the decision to publish the cartoon, saying it "is one of the things newspapers do to communicate directly with people" about issues important to all communities.

She told The New York Times, "There's been a whole history of newspapers publishing things that people would find controversial and offensive. My view is that we need to publish it for a good news reason, we need to publish in context and we need to explain to readers why we did it."

Few U.S. newspapers have reprinted the cartoon. The New York Times, in an editorial today, noted that it had not carried any of the cartoons and "much of the rest of the nation's news media have reported on the cartoons but refrained from showing them. That seems a reasonable choice for news organizations that usually refrain from gratuitous assaults on religious symbols, especially since the cartoons are so easy to describe in words."

Some newspapers have carried links to the cartoon images on their Web sites, however.

In an e-mail to the San Francisco Chronicle, "Doonesbury" creator Garry Trudeau declared he would never use images of Muhammad. "Nor will I be using any imagery that mocks Jesus Christ....I may not agree with their reasons for dropping any particular strip, in fact, I usually don't, but I will defend their right and responsibility to delete material that they feel is inappropriate for their readership," he said.

"It's not censorship, it's editing. Just because a society has almost unlimited freedom of expression doesn't mean we should ever stop thinking about its consequences in the real world."

Poynter Institute faculty discussed the journalistic issues relating to the controversy in a roundtable (read the transcript or download the 21-minute podcast).

E&P Staff (letters@editorandpublisher.com)


TOPICS: Extended News; US: District of Columbia; US: New York; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: angrymuslims; cartoon; futureofscientology; mohammedeatshotdogs; muslims; musloonies; uscartoon; uscartooncity; usnewspaper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-153 next last
To: Mark was here
TSA should have these muslims put on a watch list. Wouldn't trust them on an airplane, as they lack common sense just standing on the ground.

Absolutely. Monitor their phone calls and e-mail, too. Sorry, "moderates", but this is what you've brought on yourselves by not condemning and protesting against the Islamofascists. We non-Muslims are under no obligation to allow ourselves to be slaughtered or our country destroyed.

21 posted on 02/07/2006 10:37:51 AM PST by American Quilter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: summer
"It's disrespectful to our prophet to imply that he's a prophet of violence."

"VIII.39-42: Say to the Infidels: if they desist from their unbelief, what is now past shall be forgiven; but if they return to it, they have already before them the doom of the ancients! Fight then against them till strife be at an end, and the religion be all of it God's."

Lying is bad too.

22 posted on 02/07/2006 10:37:53 AM PST by SlowBoat407 (The best stuff happens just before the thread snaps.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: summer

" "It's disrespectful to us as a people,"

Your sacred and holy prophet was a fraud and HE'S DEAD.

You'll get my respect when you can act like a rational, civilized human being that is grateful for the country that harbors you and allows you to worship in peace.


23 posted on 02/07/2006 10:38:13 AM PST by Rebelbase (President Bush is a Texas jackass when it comes to Border security .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElectricStrawberry

Make no mistake: they'd have burnt it if they had enough thugs to get away with it. Their religion demands it.


24 posted on 02/07/2006 10:38:57 AM PST by D.P.Roberts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ElectricStrawberry

Maybe start with this one here and foment some more screaming Muslims? How about a $50,000 challenge to Muslims to disprove charges against Mohammed portraying to be a rapist, etc..?

http://kokonutpundits.blogspot.com/2006/02/50000-challenge-against-mohammed-and.html


25 posted on 02/07/2006 10:39:33 AM PST by kokonut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: summer
"It's disrespectful to our prophet to imply that he's a prophet of violence."

Two things: 1) It's true.

2) It's our right to hold that opinion and to publish it. Deal with it.

26 posted on 02/07/2006 10:39:45 AM PST by narby (Hillary! The Wicked Witch of the Left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: summer

The editors at the paper better apologize if they want to keep their heads attached to their necks, I mean these nice people belong to the religion of peace but lets not provoke them!

(Dripping sarcasm off)


27 posted on 02/07/2006 10:40:04 AM PST by trubluolyguy (Where did they get those ref's, the WWE?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: summer
Westminster Theological Seminary is located in the Philadelphia suburbs. Perhaps conservative Presbyterians (PCA and OPC), conservative Reformed believers (Christian Reformed, United Reformed), and Reformed Baptists should picket the Philadelphia Inquirer because they carried the Calvin and Hobbes comic strip. Conservative Calvinists should be outraged that the greatest theologian since Augustine is represented as a impulsive, free spirited, and often mischievous six year old boy.

Calvinists in Philadelphia need to stage Protest Warrior counterdemonstrations to the Muslim protests. (Frankly, patriotic Arminians and Catholics should join in, even if they do not hold Calvin in much esteem.)

28 posted on 02/07/2006 10:40:09 AM PST by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: summer
Amanda Bennett, The Inquirer's editor, and Carl Lavin, a deputy managing
editor, talked with the protesters outside the building.


Talk about a profile in courage.
I wouldn't blame them if they had extra security on hand.
29 posted on 02/07/2006 10:40:26 AM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: summer
Muslims Picket 'Philadephia Inquirer' After It Runs Cartoon

I think this is fine, and a proper response. Its the whackjobs that got violent, now those folks probably just need killin..

30 posted on 02/07/2006 10:40:26 AM PST by Paradox (Liberalism is a Weapon of Mass Delusion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Acts 2:38
re your post #15 - You're right. And, I was very disappointed by this paragraph, with one of our nation's most popular cartoonist kow-towing immediately to these protesters and rioters:

In an e-mail to the San Francisco Chronicle, "Doonesbury" creator Garry Trudeau declared he would never use images of Muhammad. "Nor will I be using any imagery that mocks Jesus Christ....I may not agree with their reasons for dropping any particular strip, in fact, I usually don't, but I will defend their right and responsibility to delete material that they feel is inappropriate for their readership," he said.

He sounds like he is all for censorship. What happened to you, Garry? How would you have ever made a living that way?!
31 posted on 02/07/2006 10:41:19 AM PST by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: summer

This is why most newspapers in the US will chicken-out like the NY Times and publish an article about the cartoons, complete with local Muslim reaction, but fail to show them.


32 posted on 02/07/2006 10:41:32 AM PST by D-Chivas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Acts 2:38

Over at the DUmp the rats have come to a brilliant conclusion and are all chittering the same thing, religion is bad no matter which one they're talking about.


33 posted on 02/07/2006 10:41:44 AM PST by freedomson (Tagline comment removed by moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: summer
"It's disrespectful to us as a people," Asim Abdur-Rashid, an imam with the Majlis Ash'Shura, an umbrella group for mosques in the Delaware Valley, told the Inquirer for a story today. "It's disrespectful to our prophet to imply that he's a prophet of violence."

How does the cartoon do more to "imply that he's a prophet of violence" than the actual actions of these radical Muslim militants?

Why doesn't the "peaceful" religious leaders of Islam protest as fervently against the behavior of the radicals that more strongly support such ideas?

What kind of sense does it make to rebut an implication that he's a "prophet of violence" with violent protest?
34 posted on 02/07/2006 10:42:25 AM PST by Sopater (Creatio Ex Nihilo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: summer

Can't wait till they boycott the US and goods produced here!


35 posted on 02/07/2006 10:42:29 AM PST by RedRightReturn (Even a broken clock is right twice a day...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lormand

You got that right!!


36 posted on 02/07/2006 10:43:06 AM PST by refermech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: summer
Hey Muzzies, when they dunk a model of your prophet in a jar of urine then I'll feel your pain. Even then you'll just have to get over it.
37 posted on 02/07/2006 10:43:58 AM PST by DogBarkTree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: summer

I am surprised that the (left leaning) Inquirer actually published them.. Hope springs eternal.


38 posted on 02/07/2006 10:44:34 AM PST by SueRae
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

[applause] Well stated!


39 posted on 02/07/2006 10:44:38 AM PST by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: lormand

"Neither I nor the newspaper meant any disrespect to their religion or their prophet," Bennett said in her paper. "I told them I was actually really proud of them for exercising their right to freedom of speech."

What exactly would it take for people TO show disrespect for a bunch of suicidal murdering baby killers with a camel pirate prophet? Perhaps a nuclear bomb?

Oh wait, they are already threatening that.


40 posted on 02/07/2006 10:45:53 AM PST by FastCoyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-153 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson