Skip to comments.
Islam's 20-year plan for U.S.
g2bulletin ^
| August 4, 2003
| Joseph Farah
Posted on 02/06/2006 9:47:52 AM PST by the anti-liberal
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
To: the anti-liberal
The war on the infedels has already begun. It's time to wake up and stop tolerating a religion who does not tolerate.
21
posted on
02/06/2006 10:06:07 AM PST
by
jackieaxe
(Democrats are mired in a culture of screwing English speaking, taxpaying, law abiding citizens!)
To: AntiGuv
Item #1 is one of the more stunningly ridiculous things I've ever seen, and that's saying a lot.It may sound ridiculous, but in England, a politician, Nick Griffin, was charged with a "race hate crime" for calling islam a "wicked, vicious faith." "Hate crime" legislation is a menace.
To: the anti-liberal
Your link (Author sees Islam's 20-year plan for U.S.) doesn't work.
23
posted on
02/06/2006 10:07:54 AM PST
by
Rockitz
(After all these years, it's still rocket science.)
To: the anti-liberal
With just a few wording changes concerning subject matter, about 80% could be ascribed to the relatively recent Gay & Lesbian movement.
The scary part comes about when we take honest stock of the situation and realize exactly how successful the gay/lesbian movement has become. They rallied around their collective oppression, developed a plan, communicated their plan, and executed their plan. They waged a war consisting of multiple little battles and collected multiple victories along the way. They have proven, for all the world to see, how to use us against ourselves and how to change the attitudes and actions of the most powerful nation in the world!
It is conceivable, therefore, to see Muslims using the GLBT Playbook! If you didn't pick up on this, go back and reread the original post, then think about it...
R3
24
posted on
02/06/2006 10:08:29 AM PST
by
RedRightReturn
(Even a broken clock is right twice a day...)
To: Blood of Tyrants
That part jumped out at me as well, and casts doubt over the rest.
To: teawithmisswilliams
To be very clear, I did not say that it
sounds ridiculous. I said that it
is one of the more stunningly ridiculous things I've ever seen, because it is.
And the British statutes you refer to involve hate speech laws, not hate crime laws. If that's what the article meant to say, then that's different, but a hate crime law as understood in the American legal system is a law that increases the sentence for something that is already a crime, due to the motivation of hate for a group protected by the statute. A hate speech law criminalizes the speech itself, regardless of whether any crime has been committed.
26
posted on
02/06/2006 10:11:25 AM PST
by
AntiGuv
To: Froufrou
Interesting angle! Wouldn't surprise me in the least!
27
posted on
02/06/2006 10:11:46 AM PST
by
RedRightReturn
(Even a broken clock is right twice a day...)
To: AntiGuv
You're kidding, right?
There are already hate crimes on the books to protect gays, lesbians, trans-gender-whatevers, and blacks - to name a few. Muslims are next!
R3
29
posted on
02/06/2006 10:15:03 AM PST
by
RedRightReturn
(Even a broken clock is right twice a day...)
To: RedRightReturn
No, I'm not kidding. In fact, I find it so transparently and patently ridiculous that I'm amazed this debate is even taking place. LOL
30
posted on
02/06/2006 10:19:07 AM PST
by
AntiGuv
To: RedRightReturn
No, I'm not kidding. In fact, I find it so transparently and patently ridiculous that I'm amazed this debate is even taking place. LOL
31
posted on
02/06/2006 10:19:08 AM PST
by
AntiGuv
To: the anti-liberal
We need a real link. Otherwise, this reads like a hoax email.
32
posted on
02/06/2006 10:19:45 AM PST
by
Theo
To: AntiGuv
There's that stutter again!
33
posted on
02/06/2006 10:19:48 AM PST
by
AntiGuv
To: MamaDearest; Cindy; Howlin; Dog
34
posted on
02/06/2006 10:21:17 AM PST
by
LiveFreeOrDie2001
(Fellow FReepers... Get busy, make more Conservatives !)
Comment #35 Removed by Moderator
To: AntiGuv
...but a hate crime law as understood in the American legal system is a law that increases the sentence for something that is already a crime, due to the motivation of hate for a group protected by the statute. I understand the distinction, but increasing penalties for actions because you don't like what someone was thinking when they did them is dangerous and unAmerican in my opinion. Moreover, these enhanced penalties are only applied for politically-correct victims. Ever hear of a homosexual being charged with a "hate crime" for actions against Christians? Or blacks for crimes against whites?
To: Javelina
You'll get no argument from me, but the person who posted the thread singled out item #1 so that's why I commented only on that one.
37
posted on
02/06/2006 10:25:55 AM PST
by
AntiGuv
To: Blood of Tyrants
I would suggest to do a quick Google search. Your numbers are a tad off.
38
posted on
02/06/2006 10:26:23 AM PST
by
mirado
(Next to Reagan, President Bush is the LEADER I'll follow.)
To: AntiGuv
I'm going to be getting this in my email from my mom in a couple of weeks, and I'll be able to send her the Snopes link when they catch up with it.
(BTW, the Arabic word 'bd means slave -- as in "Abdullah" which means "Slave of Allah" or even "Abdulmessiah" for "Slave of Christ" with Christian Arabs -- and not "black." "Aswad" is Arabic for black.)
To: the anti-liberal
It's now the approximate 18-year plan.
40
posted on
02/06/2006 10:27:18 AM PST
by
VOA
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson