Skip to comments.
LIVE THREAD: SJC hearing on the NSA surveilance program - C-span 1; 9:30 am EST
Posted on 02/06/2006 6:08:53 AM PST by ken5050
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,741-1,760, 1,761-1,780, 1,781-1,800 ... 2,581-2,582 next last
To: Cboldt
I think the Bush Administration doesn't trust the FISA court much..
1,761
posted on
02/06/2006 12:34:55 PM PST
by
Txsleuth
(l drink tea, not kool-aid.)
To: excludethis
Based on what you're read and what you know, do you believe the president has acted within the law?
1,762
posted on
02/06/2006 12:35:45 PM PST
by
Howlin
(Why don't you just report the news, instead of what might be the news? - Donald Rumsfeld 1/25/2006)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
They haven't been watching TV much this last week then, for sure.
1,763
posted on
02/06/2006 12:35:52 PM PST
by
Txsleuth
(l drink tea, not kool-aid.)
To: Cboldt
I think that telling a denied target is in the statute.
1,764
posted on
02/06/2006 12:35:55 PM PST
by
maica
(We are fighting the War for the Free World. Democrats and the media are not on our side.)
To: MEG33
I heard Gonzales say that this NSA domestic to foreign calls surveillance was not claimed under the FISA law, not meant to override the FISA law.. but the President's authority claimed was by the authorization given by Congress to fight Al Queda. The argument that I find lame is the one that aims to show thatteh surveillance in question is within the boundaries expressed in FISA, because FISA says "or other authorization," and the AUMF is that "other authorization."
To: Txsleuth
I think the Bush Administration doesn't trust the FISA court much..The DemonicRats would like the Public to believe that!!!
I don't !
To: Txsleuth
Answer me this....why hasn't Judge Robertson spoken to the press if he was so bothered by the US spying on calls.
1,767
posted on
02/06/2006 12:36:54 PM PST
by
Dog
To: northernlightsII
Why is your account suspended? Because I have been very very naughty.
To: sageb1
What's the deal with Brownback and Lindsey? Obviously the war powers act passed by Congress is a valid and the strongest argument by the AG. I wish Gonzales would simply say "We can't trust many members of the Senate" and slowly remind Leahy of his leaking history. Just put it all on the table!!
Is it true that Lindsey is homosexual?
1,769
posted on
02/06/2006 12:37:20 PM PST
by
caffe
To: BigSkyFreeper
Let this hearing keep going because the more they talk the more America understands that President Bush is fighting to Protect Americans and DinocRats are fighting to Protect Al Queda!
Pray for W and Our Freedom Fighters
1,770
posted on
02/06/2006 12:37:32 PM PST
by
bray
(Jack Bauer '08)
To: Cboldt
1,771
posted on
02/06/2006 12:37:39 PM PST
by
tiredoflaundry
(I'll admit it , I'm a Snow Flake !(Snoq) The rest of my tagline redacted by court order.)
To: tiredoflaundry
1,772
posted on
02/06/2006 12:38:21 PM PST
by
Gritty
(“A court of law is not meant to be a field of battle” – Mark Steyn)
To: Txsleuth
"I think the Bush Administration doesn't trust the FISA court much.."
I think this is the main reason we are listening to these hearings. I really think something is/was up with the FISA court and at least one of its judges. It could be why JR went to the NYT.
1,773
posted on
02/06/2006 12:38:29 PM PST
by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
To: tiredoflaundry
1,774
posted on
02/06/2006 12:38:34 PM PST
by
conservativebabe
("I came here to chew bubble gum and kick @ss, and I'm all out of bubble gum")
To: sageb1
Especially if any of the judges have treasonous friends.That Clinton FISA judge who quit comes to mind.
1,775
posted on
02/06/2006 12:38:35 PM PST
by
johnny7
(“Iuventus stultorum magister”)
To: Dog
To many people in fly over country favor us listening into comms from AQ. Two weeks ago I would have agreed however listening to how the tide has changed with polls now showing 46% of the public is concerned, it's obvious the MSM has effectively changed minds with their constant harping. Couple that with some RINOs wringing their hands (but not before reading the new polls) and we have people now paying attention.
To: Cboldt
See....I said earlier, from Kyl's questioning...and Sessions...that perhaps this may end up with WIDER powers for Bush....as far a domestic taps if known al-queda members are talking with each other..
1,777
posted on
02/06/2006 12:39:12 PM PST
by
Txsleuth
(l drink tea, not kool-aid.)
To: All
When is cocktail hour?
Senator Ted Kennedy (C) (D-MA) speaks with Senate Judiciary Committee ranking Democrat Pat Leahy (R) (D-VT) and committee chairman Arlen Specter (R-PA) during a hearing on Capitol Hill about domestic eavesdropping, in Washington February 6, 2006. Giving his testimony, U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales defended the Bush administration's domestic eavesdropping program as an indispensable tool to protect the country from terrorism, denying accusations the White House broke the law. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque
1,778
posted on
02/06/2006 12:39:17 PM PST
by
maggief
(and the dessert cart rolls on ...)
To: All
Feingold at it again....barf!
To: Txsleuth
I think the Bush Administration doesn't trust the FISA court much. What Gonzales just said sure indicates that.
AFAIK, there are ZERO leaks attributed to a FISA court, or to any court that has had opportunity to review FISA warrants. If the courts aren't leakers, Gonzales should not suggest in public that they would be, given the opportunity.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,741-1,760, 1,761-1,780, 1,781-1,800 ... 2,581-2,582 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson