Skip to comments.
White House to lash out at media coverage of terror surveillance
Financial Times ^
| Feb. 6, 2006
| Edward Alden and Christopher Swann
Posted on 02/05/2006 7:44:02 PM PST by FairOpinion
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
That's good news. They need to fight back -- our lives may depend on it, literally.
To: FairOpinion
2
posted on
02/05/2006 7:44:38 PM PST
by
pcottraux
(It's pronounced "P. Coe-troe.")
To: FairOpinion
I'm envisioning another tepid letter written from the RNC.
To: FairOpinion
Notice the word scheme?
4
posted on
02/05/2006 7:45:36 PM PST
by
MarkeyD
(Cowards cut and run. Marines finish the job. I really, really loathe liberals.)
To: FairOpinion; hipaatwo
They need to shove the BS down the liberals throats
5
posted on
02/05/2006 7:45:51 PM PST
by
Mo1
(Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists.. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
To: FairOpinion
To: Mo1
We need General Honore to speak for the White House - the media is "stuck on stupid" and doesn't hear basic information without distorting it like a pretzel.
To: FairOpinion
8
posted on
02/05/2006 7:47:39 PM PST
by
nopardons
To: FairOpinion
9
posted on
02/05/2006 7:48:33 PM PST
by
nopardons
To: FairOpinion
"badly distorted"? Give me a break! How bout GROSSLY AND BLANTENLY distorted to support the left wing liberal agenda. Even then they fight back they still use kid gloves just in case someone gets offended.
To: Mo1
I know the Bush admin has done well with this program, and probably have prevented many attacks. The ones that have not been prevented have been called something else, like the Egyptian pilot who lawn darted a plane full of people into the ocean a few years ago, the dude that shot up an El-Al ticket counter a few years ago, etc.
I'm just worried about the future. What happens when a lib gets in office and decides the NRA is a terrorist organization?
11
posted on
02/05/2006 7:48:56 PM PST
by
308MBR
(The only time four doors look cool are when they are on two cars.)
To: princess leah
We need General Honore to speak for the White House - the media is "stuck on stupid" They should just tell Congress if they hate the program so much then they can do away with it
And when we are attacked again .. Congress can take FULL responsibility for it
12
posted on
02/05/2006 7:50:04 PM PST
by
Mo1
(Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists.. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
To: FairOpinion
The conclusion of the Left, and Arlen Specter, that the AUMF does not authorize the surveillance because it does not specifically mention surveillance amounts to saying this:
We can kill Al Qaeda, we just can't listen to their phone calls.
13
posted on
02/05/2006 7:50:15 PM PST
by
Buckhead
To: Lancer_N3502A
I think it's high time to go after some of these sewer rats. We can start with Rockefeller for treason, Adolph Hitlery under RICO, Schumer, Fienstien, Boxer, Kennedy, etc.
To: 308MBR
What happens when a lib gets in office and decides the NRA is a terrorist organization? Well it's up to us the Voter to much sure they don't get in office
15
posted on
02/05/2006 7:52:14 PM PST
by
Mo1
(Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists.. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
To: Mo1
What time does this start tomorrow. I want to make sure I'm up. I hope Gonzalez rips them a new one.
16
posted on
02/05/2006 8:03:56 PM PST
by
hipaatwo
To: Mo1
I have little confidence in the American voters, since the last election proved that we have 58 million people satisfied with mediocrity, and 56 million who are total idiots. THAT'S TOO CLOSE FOR COMFORT.
Over 56 million people voted Democrat, even for a stiff lying loser like Kerry. If a charismatic person (not Hillary) were to run, the GOP would be in trouble. It's not like we don't make plenty of troubles for ourselves by supporting sheetheads like Chafee, Snowe, etc.
17
posted on
02/05/2006 8:07:52 PM PST
by
308MBR
(The only time four doors look cool are when they are on two cars.)
To: hipaatwo
http://judiciary.senate.gov/hearing.cfm?id=1727
FEBRUARY 6, 2006
""Wartime Executive Power and the NSAs Surveillance Authority" "
Senate Judiciary Committee
Full Committee
DATE: February 6, 2006
TIME: 09:30 AM
ROOM: SH 216
OFFICIAL HEARING NOTICE / WITNESS LIST:
January 18, 2006
NOTICE OF FULL COMMITTEE HEARING
The Senate Committee on the Judiciary will hold a hearing on "Wartime Executive Power and the NSAs Surveillance Authority" at 9:30 a.m. on Monday, February 6, 2006 at 9:30 a.m. in Hart Senate Office Building, Room 216.
By order of the Chairman
Witness List
Hearing before the
Senate Judiciary Committee
on
"Wartime Executive Power and the National Security Agencys Surveillance Authority"
Monday, February 6, 2006
Hart Senate Office Building Room 216
9:30 a.m.
PANEL I
The Honorable Alberto Gonzales
Attorney General
U.S. Department of Justice
Washington, D.C.
18
posted on
02/05/2006 8:08:12 PM PST
by
Mo1
(Republicans protect Americans from Terrorists.. Democrats protect Terrorists from Americans)
To: Mo1
Gonzalez needs to do that...in his opening remarks...stand up...and tell Specter and gang to call him in the future, IF they get any real evidence that the hearing is necessary.
19
posted on
02/05/2006 8:08:55 PM PST
by
Txsleuth
(l drink tea, not kool-aid.)
To: FairOpinion
according to Time magazine, which has obtained documents outlining the planned testimony. Sheesh. Who leaked THIS?
20
posted on
02/05/2006 8:09:38 PM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson